Clinical evaluation of 4D PET motion compensation strategies for treatment verification in ion beam therapy

A clinical trial named PROMETHEUS is currently ongoing for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT, Germany). In this framework, 4D PET-CT datasets are acquired shortly after the therapeutic treatment to compare the irradiation induced PET image with a Monte Carlo PET prediction resulting from the simulation of treatment delivery. The extremely low count statistics of this measured PET image represents a major limitation of this technique, especially in presence of target motion. The purpose of the study is to investigate two different 4D PET motion compensation strategies towards the recovery of the whole count statistics for improved image quality of the 4D PET-CT datasets for PET-based treatment verification. The well-known 4D-MLEM reconstruction algorithm, embedding the motion compensation in the reconstruction process of 4D PET sinograms, was compared to a recently proposed pre-reconstruction motion compensation strategy, which operates in sinogram domain by applying the motion compensation to the 4D PET sinograms. With reference to phantom and patient datasets, advantages and drawbacks of the two 4D PET motion compensation strategies were identified. The 4D-MLEM algorithm was strongly affected by inverse inconsistency of the motion model but demonstrated the capability to mitigate the noise-break-up effects. Conversely, the pre-reconstruction warping showed less sensitivity to inverse inconsistency but also more noise in the reconstructed images. The comparison was performed by relying on quantification of PET activity and ion range difference, typically yielding similar results. The study demonstrated that treatment verification of moving targets could be accomplished by relying on the whole count statistics image quality, as obtained from the application of 4D PET motion compensation strategies. In particular, the pre-reconstruction warping was shown to represent a promising choice when combined with intra-reconstruction smoothing.

[1]  Julia Bauer,et al.  Regional MLEM reconstruction strategy for PET-based treatment verification in ion beam radiotherapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Systematic errors in respiratory gating due to intrafraction deformations of the liver. , 2007, Medical physics.

[3]  M van Herk,et al.  Reconstruction of a time-averaged midposition CT scan for radiotherapy planning of lung cancer patients using deformable registrationa). , 2008, Medical physics.

[4]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  Investigating the limits of PET/CT imaging at very low true count rates and high random fractions in ion-beam therapy monitoring. , 2015, Medical physics.

[5]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Challenges of radiotherapy: report on the 4D treatment planning workshop 2013. , 2014, Physica medica (Testo stampato).

[6]  V. Vlachoudis,et al.  The FLUKA Code: Developments and Challenges for High Energy and Medical Applications , 2014 .

[7]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Vision 20/20: Positron emission tomography in radiation therapy planning, delivery, and monitoring. , 2015, Medical physics.

[8]  K Parodi,et al.  Experimental verification of a 4D MLEM reconstruction algorithm used for in-beam PET measurements in particle therapy , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Four-Dimensional Image Reconstruction Strategies in Cardiac-Gated and Respiratory-Gated PET Imaging. , 2013, PET clinics.

[10]  Marco Riboldi,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided versus surrogate-based motion tracking in liver radiation therapy: a prospective comparative study. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  M. Riboldi,et al.  A multiple points method for 4D CT image sorting. , 2011, Medical physics.

[12]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Julia Bauer,et al.  Hypofractionated carbon ion therapy delivered with scanned ion beams for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – feasibility and clinical response , 2013, Radiation Oncology.

[14]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  Attenuation and scatter correction for in-beam positron emission tomography monitoring of tumour irradiations with heavy ions. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Respiratory motion models: a review. , 2013 .

[16]  Marco Riboldi,et al.  Real-time tumour tracking in particle therapy: technological developments and future perspectives. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  Katia Parodi,et al.  PET imaging for treatment verification of ion therapy: Implementation and experience at GSI Darmstadt and MGH Boston , 2008 .

[18]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Accuracy of proton beam range verification using post-treatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography as function of treatment site. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  T Haberer,et al.  Gating delays for two respiratory motion sensors in scanned particle radiation therapy , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  P Manescu,et al.  Motion compensation for PET image reconstruction using deformable tetrahedral meshes , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  A sinogram warping strategy for pre-reconstruction 4D PET optimization , 2015, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[22]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  Implementation and initial clinical experience of offline PET/CT-based verification of scanned carbon ion treatment. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  N Kandasamy,et al.  On developing B-spline registration algorithms for multi-core processors , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Registration accuracy and image quality of time averaged mid-position CT scans for liver SBRT. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  Katia Parodi,et al.  On- and off-line monitoring of ion beam treatment , 2016 .

[26]  Oliver Jäkel,et al.  Positron emission tomography for quality assurance of cancer therapy with light ion beams , 1999 .

[27]  A. Ferrari,et al.  FLUKA: A Multi-Particle Transport Code , 2005 .

[28]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  Respiratory Motion Correction Strategies in Thoracic PET-CT Imaging. , 2013, PET clinics.

[29]  A J Lomax,et al.  Deformable motion reconstruction for scanned proton beam therapy using on-line x-ray imaging , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  H Paganetti,et al.  Automation and uncertainty analysis of a method for in-vivo range verification in particle therapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  PET-CT scanner characterization for PET raw data use in biomedical research , 2014, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[32]  Katia Parodi,et al.  PET monitoring of hadrontherapy , 2012 .

[33]  K. Parodi,et al.  4D offline PET-based treatment verification in scanned ion beam therapy: a phantom study , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Katia Parodi,et al.  4D in-beam positron emission tomography for verification of motion-compensated ion beam therapy. , 2009, Medical physics.

[35]  Jinsong Ouyang,et al.  Monitoring proton radiation therapy with in-room PET imaging , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  H Paganetti,et al.  Systematic analysis of biological and physical limitations of proton beam range verification with offline PET/CT scans , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Marco Riboldi,et al.  Liver 4DMRI: A retrospective image-based sorting method. , 2015, Medical physics.

[38]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  Initial clinical evaluation of PET-based ion beam therapy monitoring under consideration of organ motion. , 2016, Medical physics.

[39]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Clinical application of in-room positron emission tomography for in vivo treatment monitoring in proton radiation therapy. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[40]  D. Townsend,et al.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  C Bert,et al.  Experimental investigation of irregular motion impact on 4D PET-based particle therapy monitoring. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  Marco Durante,et al.  Four-dimensional patient dose reconstruction for scanned ion beam therapy of moving liver tumors. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.