Forest bioenergy climate impact can be improved by allocating forest residue removal

Bioenergy from forest residues can be used to avoid fossil carbon emissions, but removing biomass from forests reduces carbon stock sizes and carbon input to litter and soil. The magnitude and longevity of these carbon stock changes determine how effective measures to utilize bioenergy from forest residues are to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the energy sector and to mitigate climate change. In this study, we estimate the variability of GHG emissions and consequent climate impacts resulting from producing bioenergy from stumps, branches and residual biomass of forest thinning operations in Finland, and the contribution of the variability in key factors, i.e. forest residue diameter, tree species, geographical location of the forest biomass removal site and harvesting method, to the emissions and their climate impact. The GHG emissions and the consequent climate impacts estimated as changes in radiative forcing were comparable to fossil fuels when bioenergy production from forest residues was initiated. The emissions and climate impacts decreased over time because forest residues were predicted to decompose releasing CO2 even if left in the forest. Both were mainly affected by forest residue diameter and climatic conditions of the forest residue collection site. Tree species and the harvest method of thinning wood (whole tree or stem‐only) had a smaller effect on the magnitude of emissions. The largest reduction in the energy production climate impacts after 20 years, up to 62%, was achieved when coal was replaced by the branches collected from Southern Finland, whereas the smallest reduction 7% was gained by using stumps from Northern Finland instead of natural gas. After 100 years the corresponding values were 77% and 21%. The choice of forest residue biomass collected affects significantly the emissions and climate impacts of forest bioenergy.

[1]  G. Marland,et al.  Full fuel cycle carbon balances of bioenergy and forestry options. , 1996 .

[2]  To the Ministry of Employment and the Economy , 2014 .

[3]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[4]  Hans Petersson,et al.  Assessing carbon balance trade-offs between bioenergy and carbon sequestration of stumps at varying time scales and harvest intensities , 2010 .

[5]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[6]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Towards a Standard Methodology for Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy Systems in Comparison with Fossil Energy Systems , 1997 .

[7]  H. Mäkinen,et al.  Predicting the decomposition of Scots pine, Norway spruce, and birch stems in Finland. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  J. Liski,et al.  Density of organic carbon in soil at coniferous forest sites in southern Finland , 1995 .

[9]  Raili Voipio,et al.  Pienikokoisten puiden maanpäällisen biomassan kemiallinen koostumus. , 1992 .

[10]  Dr. Pentti Hakkila.  Utilization of Residual Forest Biomass , 1989, Springer Series in Wood Science.

[11]  G. Forsberg.  Biomass energy transport: Analysis of bioenergy transport chains using life cycle inventory method , 2000 .

[12]  SUVI MONNI,et al.  Radiative Forcing Due to Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Finland: Methods for Estimating Forcing of a Country or an Activity , 2003, Environmental management.

[13]  H. Mäkinen,et al.  Do decomposing Scots pine, Norway spruce, and silver birch stems retain nitrogen? , 2008 .

[14]  G. Hope.  Changes in soil properties, tree growth, and nutrition over a period of 10 years after stump removal and scarification on moderately coarse soils in interior British Columbia , 2007 .

[15]  J. Liski,et al.  Wood decomposition model for boreal forests , 2011 .

[16]  J. Melillo,et al.  Indirect Emissions from Biofuels: How Important? , 2009, Science.

[17]  M. Harmon,et al.  Decomposition vectors: a new approach to estimating woody detritus decomposition dynamics , 2000 .

[18]  Pekka Tamminen,et al.  Logging residue removal after thinning in Nordic boreal forests: Long-term impact on tree growth , 2011 .

[19]  J. Liski,et al.  Carbon storage in forest soil of Finland. 2. Size and regional pattern , 1997 .

[20]  Solid biofuels. Fuel specifications and classes , 2022 .

[21]  Douglas L. Godbold,et al.  Stump Harvesting for Bioenergy - A Review of the Environmental Impacts , 2010 .

[22]  B. Berg,et al.  Changes in organic-chemical components and ingrowth of fungal mycelium in decomposing birch leaf litter as compared to pine needles , 1984, Pedobiologia.

[23]  G. Egnell.  Is the productivity decline in Norway spruce following whole-tree harvesting in the final felling in boreal Sweden permanent or temporary? , 2011 .

[24]  L. Finér,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen release from decomposing Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch stumps , 2010 .

[25]  Margareta Wihersaari,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from final harvest fuel chip production in Finland , 2005 .

[26]  T. Laurila,et al.  Forestation of boreal peatlands: Impacts of changing albedo and greenhouse gas fluxes on radiative forcing , 2010 .

[27]  Manoj Joshi,et al.  An alternative to radiative forcing for estimating the relative importance of climate change mechanisms , 2003 .

[28]  Sampo Soimakallio,et al.  Greenhouse gas balances and new business opportunities for biomass-based transportation fuels and agrobiomass in Finland , 2009 .

[29]  Juha Nurmi,et al.  Heating values of mature trees. , 1997 .

[30]  Ann Kristin Raymer,et al.  A comparison of avoided greenhouse gas emissions when using different kinds of wood energy , 2006 .

[31]  L. Zetterberg,et al.  Climate impact from peat utilisation in Sweden , 2004 .

[32]  J. Pumpanen,et al.  Soil CO 2 efflux from a podzolic forest soil before and after forest clear-cutting and site preparation , 2004 .

[33]  P.I.I. Börjesson,et al.  Emissions of CO2 from Biomass Production and Transportation in Agriculture and Forestry , 1996 .

[34]  Timo Penttilä,et al.  Decomposition of Scots pine fine woody debris in boreal conditions: Implications for estimating carbon pools and fluxes , 2009 .

[35]  Juha Nurmi,et al.  Heating values of the above ground biomass of small-sized trees. , 1993 .

[36]  J. Liski,et al.  Carbon storage in forest soil of Finland. 1. Effect of thermoclimate , 1997 .

[37]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[38]  K K O T U O M I,et al.  Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues , 2011 .

[39]  J. Liski,et al.  Leaf litter decomposition-Estimates of global variability based on Yasso07 model , 2009, 0906.0886.

[40]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Emissions from bioenergy: improved accounting options and new policy needs , 2010 .

[41]  Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study , 2022 .

[42]  F. Hagedorn,et al.  How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration , 2007 .

[43]  Margareta Wihersaari,et al.  Evaluation of greenhouse gas emission risks from storage of wood residue , 2005 .

[44]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change , 1998 .

[45]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[46]  B. Berg,et al.  Lignin and holocellulose relations during long-term decomposition of some forest litters. Long-term decomposition in a Scots pine forest. IV , 1984 .

[47]  Helena Mälkki,et al.  Selected emissions and efficiencies of energy systems based on logging and sawmill residues , 2003 .

[48]  Tomas Nordfjell,et al.  Decomposition of stump and root systems of Norway spruce in Sweden—A modelling approach , 2009 .

[49]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  Model analysis of the effects of soil age, fires and harvesting on the carbon storage of boreal forest soils , 1998 .

[50]  M. Harmon,et al.  Ecology of Coarse Woody Debris in Temperate Ecosystems , 1986 .

[51]  Taru Palosuo,et al.  Greenhouse Impact Due to the Use of Combustible Fuels: Life Cycle Viewpoint and Relative Radiative Forcing Commitment , 2008, Environmental management.

[52]  H. Verkerk,et al.  Carbon Balance of Forest Residue Collection and Combustion in Southern-Finland , 2010 .

[53]  Keith P. Shine,et al.  The global warming potential—the need for an interdisciplinary retrial , 2009 .

[54]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Comparative analysis of wood chips and bundles - costs, carbon dioxide emissions, dry-matter losses and allergic reactions. , 2010 .

[55]  J. Spitzer,et al.  CARBON BALANCE OF BIOENERGY FROM LOGGING RESIDUES , 1995 .

[56]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Fixing a Critical Climate Accounting Error , 2009, Science.

[57]  Dominik Röser,et al.  Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy - possibilities and problems: policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries. , 2007 .