Results are presented from an intercomparison of atmospheric general circulation model ( AGCM ) simulations of tropical convection during the Tropical Warm Pool – International Cloud Experiment

[1] Results are presented from an intercomparison of atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) simulations of tropical convection during the Tropical Warm Pool–International Cloud Experiment (TWP-ICE). The distinct cloud properties, precipitation, radiation, and vertical diabatic heating profiles associated with three different monsoon regimes (wet, dry, and break) from available observations are used to evaluate 9 AGCM forecasts initialized daily from realistic global analyses. All models captured well the evolution of large-scale circulation and thermodynamic fields, but cloud properties differed substantially among models. Compared with the relatively well simulated top-heavy heating structures during the wet and break period, most models had difficulty in depicting the bottom-heavy heating profiles associated with cumulus congestus during the dry period. The best performing models during this period were the ones whose convection scheme was most responsive to the free tropospheric humidity. Compared with the large impact of cloud and convective parameterizations on model cloud and precipitation characteristics, resolution has relatively minor impact on simulated cloud properties. However, one feature that was influenced by resolution in several models was the diurnal cycle of precipitation. Peaking at a different time from convective precipitation, large-scale precipitation generally increases in high resolution forecasts and modulates the total precipitation diurnal cycle. Overall, the study emphasizes the need for convection parameterizations that are more responsive to environmental conditions as well as the substantial diversity among large-scale cloud and precipitation schemes in current AGCMs. This experiment has demonstrated itself to be a very useful test bed for those developing cloud and convection schemes for AGCMs.

[1]  N. McFarlane,et al.  Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.

[2]  David D. Turner,et al.  Toward understanding of differences in current cloud retrievals of ARM ground‐based measurements , 2012 .

[3]  Kathrin Wapler,et al.  A case of offshore convective initiation by interacting land breezes near Darwin, Australia , 2012, Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics.

[4]  Nils Wedi,et al.  Simulating the diurnal cycle of rainfall in global climate models: resolution versus parameterization , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[5]  E. Maloney,et al.  A Systematic Relationship between Intraseasonal Variability and Mean State Bias in AGCM Simulations , 2011 .

[6]  Sean Milton,et al.  Adaptive detrainment in a convective parametrization , 2011 .

[7]  S. Klein,et al.  Impact of horizontal resolution on climate model forecasts of tropical precipitation and diabatic heating for the TWP‐ICE period , 2010 .

[8]  Thomas Reichler,et al.  Analysis and Reduction of Systematic Errors through a Seamless Approach to Modeling Weather and Climate , 2010 .

[9]  Ramaswamy,et al.  The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3 , 2011 .

[10]  A. Pier Siebesma,et al.  Analytical expressions for entrainment and detrainment in cumulus convection , 2010 .

[11]  S. Klein,et al.  Observed large-scale structures and diabatic heating and drying profiles during TWP-ICE , 2010 .

[12]  Martin Köhler,et al.  The ECMWF model climate: recent progress through improved physical parametrizations , 2010 .

[13]  Shian-Jiann Lin,et al.  Simulations of global hurricane climatology, interannual variability, and response to global warming using a 50-km resolution GCM. , 2009 .

[14]  Robert S. Plant,et al.  A review of the theoretical basis for bulk mass flux convective parameterization , 2009 .

[15]  N. Lau,et al.  Simulation of Synoptic- and Subsynoptic-Scale Phenomena Associated with the East Asian Summer Monsoon Using a High-Resolution GCM , 2009 .

[16]  R. Neale,et al.  The Impact of Convection on ENSO: From a Delayed Oscillator to a Series of Events , 2008 .

[17]  P. Bechtold,et al.  Modelling suppressed and active convection: Comparisons between three global atmospheric models , 2008 .

[18]  G. Mace,et al.  Cirrus cloud microphysical properties and air motion statistics using cloud radar Doppler moments: Water content, particle size, and sedimentation relationships , 2008 .

[19]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests , 2008 .

[20]  Martin Köhler,et al.  Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time‐scales , 2008 .

[21]  G. McFarquhar,et al.  The Tropical Warm Pool International Cloud Experiment , 2008 .

[22]  Shaocheng Xie,et al.  Climate Model Forecast Experiments for TOGA COARE , 2008 .

[23]  S. Klein,et al.  Simulations of Arctic mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with CAM3 and AM2 for M-PACE , 2008 .

[24]  R. Hogan,et al.  Testing IWC Retrieval Methods Using Radar and Ancillary Measurements with In Situ Data , 2008 .

[25]  Dong L. Wu,et al.  Cloud ice: A climate model challenge with signs and expectations of progress , 2007 .

[26]  Shepard A. Clough,et al.  Retrieving Liquid Wat0er Path and Precipitable Water Vapor From the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Microwave Radiometers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  D. Williamson,et al.  A Comparison of Forecast Errors in CAM2 and CAM3 at the ARM Southern Great Plains Site , 2007 .

[28]  Martin Willett,et al.  Modelling suppressed and active convection. Comparing a numerical weather prediction, cloud‐resolving and single‐column model , 2007 .

[29]  Alain Protat,et al.  Evaluation of Ice Water Content Retrievals from Cloud Radar Reflectivity and Temperature Using a Large Airborne In Situ Microphysical Database , 2007 .

[30]  Y. Hong,et al.  The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-Global, Multiyear, Combined-Sensor Precipitation Estimates at Fine Scales , 2007 .

[31]  D. Randall,et al.  Climate models and their evaluation , 2007 .

[32]  Tim N. Palmer,et al.  Using numerical weather prediction to assess climate models , 2007 .

[33]  Peter T. May,et al.  The statistical characteristics of convective cells in a monsoon regime (Darwin, Northern Australia) , 2007 .

[34]  Thomas Jung,et al.  Sensitivity of extratropical cyclone characteristics to horizontal resolution in the ECMWF model , 2006 .

[35]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Tropical Intraseasonal Variability in 14 IPCC AR4 Climate Models. Part I: Convective Signals , 2006 .

[36]  G. Martin,et al.  The Physical Properties of the Atmosphere in the New Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model (HadGEM1). Part I: Model Description and Global Climatology , 2006 .

[37]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  A New Parameterization of Cloud Droplet Activation Applicable to General Circulation Models , 2006 .

[38]  David L. Williamson,et al.  Diagnosis of Community Atmospheric Model 2 (CAM2) in numerical weather forecast configuration at Atmospheric Radiation Measurement sites , 2005 .

[39]  David L. Williamson,et al.  Moisture and temperature balances at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains Site in forecasts with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM2) , 2005 .

[40]  David L. Williamson,et al.  Evaluating Parameterizations in General Circulation Models: Climate Simulation Meets Weather Prediction , 2004 .

[41]  Pedro M. M. Soares,et al.  Sensitivity of moist convection to environmental humidity , 2004 .

[42]  A. Betts,et al.  The simulation of the diurnal cycle of convective precipitation over land in a global model , 2004 .

[43]  G. Danabasoglu,et al.  The Community Climate System Model Version 4 , 2011 .

[44]  Christopher S. Bretherton,et al.  A New Parameterization for Shallow Cumulus Convection and Its Application to Marine Subtropical Cloud-Topped Boundary Layers. Part I: Description and 1D Results , 2004 .

[45]  K. Trenberth,et al.  The Diurnal Cycle and Its Depiction in the Community Climate System Model , 2004 .

[46]  M. Newman,et al.  Stratiform Precipitation, Vertical Heating Profiles, and the Madden Julian Oscillation , 2004 .

[47]  C. Jakob,et al.  Study of diurnal cycle of convective precipitation over Amazonia using a single column model , 2002 .

[48]  A. Tompkins.  A Prognostic Parameterization for the Subgrid-Scale Variability of Water Vapor and Clouds in Large-Scale Models and Its Use to Diagnose Cloud Cover , 2002 .

[49]  Michael Buchhold,et al.  The Operational Global Icosahedral-Hexagonal Gridpoint Model GME: Description and High-Resolution Tests , 2002 .

[50]  Leo J. Donner,et al.  A Cumulus Parameterization Including Mass Fluxes, Convective Vertical Velocities, and Mesoscale Effects: Thermodynamic and Hydrological Aspects in a General Circulation Model , 2001 .

[51]  E. Bazile,et al.  A mass‐flux convection scheme for regional and global models , 2001 .

[52]  J. Slingo,et al.  The Diurnal Cycle in the Tropics , 2001 .

[53]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK meteorological office unified model , 1999 .

[54]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  A Comparison of the CCM3 Model Climate Using Diagnosed and Predicted Condensate Parameterizations , 1998 .

[55]  David A. Randall,et al.  A cumulus parameterization with a prognostic closure , 1998 .

[56]  D. Gregory,et al.  Parametrization of momentum transport by convection. II: Tests in single‐column and general circulation models , 1997 .

[57]  Leon D. Rotstayn,et al.  A physically based scheme for the treatment of stratiform clouds and precipitation in large‐scale models. I: Description and evaluation of the microphysical processes , 1997 .

[58]  J. Hack.  Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model (CCM2) , 1994 .

[59]  M. Tiedtke,et al.  Representation of Clouds in Large-Scale Models , 1993 .

[60]  Leo J. Donner,et al.  A Cumulus Parameterization Including Mass Fluxes, Vertical Momentum Dynamics, and Mesoscale Effects , 1993 .

[61]  S. Moorthi,et al.  Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert - A parameterization of moist convection for general circulation models , 1992 .

[62]  P. Rowntree,et al.  A Mass Flux Convection Scheme with Representation of Cloud Ensemble Characteristics and Stability-Dependent Closure , 1990 .

[63]  R. Smith.  A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model , 1990 .

[64]  M. Tiedtke.  A Comprehensive Mass Flux Scheme for Cumulus Parameterization in Large-Scale Models , 1989 .

[65]  J. Kristjánsson,et al.  Condensation and Cloud Parameterization Studies with a Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Model , 1989 .

[66]  S. Rutledge,et al.  The Mesoscale and Microscale Structure and Organization of Clouds and Precipitation in Midlatitude Cyclones. VIII: A Model for the “Seeder-Feeder” Process in Warm-Frontal Rainbands , 1983 .

[67]  S. Esbensen,et al.  Determination of Bulk Properties of Tropical Cloud Clusters from Large-Scale Heat and Moisture Budgets , 1973 .