Bicyclists' speed adaptation strategies when conducting self-paced vs. system-paced smartphone tasks in traffic

The increasing prevalence of mobile phone usage while cycling has raised concerns, even though the number of cyclists involved in accidents does not increase at a comparable rate. A reason for this may be how cyclists adapt travelling speed and task execution to the current traffic situation. The aim of this study is to investigate speed adaptation among cyclists when conducting self-paced (initiated by the cyclist) vs. system-paced (initiated by somebody else) smartphone tasks in real traffic. Twenty-two cyclists completed a track in real traffic while listening to music, receiving and making calls, receiving and sending text messages, and searching for information on the internet. The route and the types of tasks were controlled, but the cyclists could choose rather freely when and where along the route to carry out the tasks, thus providing semi-naturalistic data on compensatory behaviour. The results clearly show that cyclists use conscious strategies to adapt their speed to accommodate the execution of secondary phone tasks. Regarding tactical behaviour, it was found that cyclists kept on cycling in 80% of the system-paced cases and in 70% of the self-paced cases. In the remaining cases, the cyclists chose to execute the phone task while standing still or when walking. Compared to the baseline (17.6 ± 3.5 km/h), the mean speed was slightly increased when the cyclists listened to music (18.2 ± 3.7 km/h) and clearly decreased when they interacted with the phone (13.0 ± 5.0 km/h). The speed reduction profile differed between self-paced and system-paced tasks with a preparatory speed reduction before task initiation for self-paced tasks. In conclusion, when the cyclists had the chance they either stopped or adapted their speed proactively to accommodate the execution of the phone task. For self-paced tasks, the speed reduction was finalised before task initialisation, and for system-paced tasks the speed adaptation occurred in reaction to the incoming task. It is recommended to investigate whether the observed compensatory behaviour is enough to offset the possible negative effects of smartphone use.

[1]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Effects of listening to music, and of using a handheld and handsfree telephone on cycling behaviour , 2011 .

[2]  Nadja Schömig,et al.  Three levels of situation awareness in driving with secondary tasks , 2013 .

[3]  F.R.H. Zijlstra,et al.  Efficiency in work behaviour: A design approach for modern tools , 1993 .

[4]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Human behavior and traffic safety , 2011 .

[5]  Kathryn Terzano,et al.  Bicycling safety and distracted behavior in The Hague, the Netherlands. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Kristen E Beede,et al.  Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Corinne Brusque,et al.  Drivers' adaptation to mobile phone use: Interaction strategies, consequences on driving behaviour and potential impact on road safety , 2013 .

[8]  John A. Michon,et al.  A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know , 1985 .

[9]  Jan E B Törnros,et al.  Mobile phone use-effects of handheld and handsfree phones on driving performance. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  R. Fuller.  Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Frank Drews,et al.  Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Understanding driver self-regulating behavior: how does phone use influence vehicle control in real world? , 2013 .

[13]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Bicyclists’ Visual Strategies When Conducting Self-Paced Vs. System-Paced Smartphone Tasks in Traffic , 2016 .

[14]  Rebecca L Olson,et al.  The Impact of Hand-Held and Hands-Free Cell Phone Use on Driving Performance and Safety-Critical Event Risk , 2013 .

[15]  C Goldenbeld,et al.  The use and risk of portable electronic devices while cycling among different age groups. , 2012, Journal of safety research.

[16]  Paul Atchley,et al.  The need of young adults to text now: Using delay discounting to assess informational choice , 2012 .

[17]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Vehicle-based studies of driving in the real world: the hard truth? , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Richard A. Young.  Driving Consistency Errors Overestimate Crash Risk from Cellular Conversation in Two Case-Crossover Studies , 2017 .

[19]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[20]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[21]  Frank Drews,et al.  A Comparison of the Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[22]  George Yannis,et al.  Mobile phone use by young drivers: effects on traffic speed and headways , 2010 .

[23]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of operating a touch screen smartphone and other common activities performed while bicycling on cycling behaviour , 2014 .

[24]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Mobile phone use while cycling: Incidence and effects on behaviour and safety , 2010, Ergonomics.

[25]  T. Dingus,et al.  Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.