REFLECTION OF EMPATHIC DESIGN PROCESS ON INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE STUDENTS’ UNIVERSAL DESIGN SOLUTIONS

In design education, applying universal design (UD) and human factors/ ergonomics (HF/E) principles can be a complicated task in practice for students who must apply these principles in their designs. Designing products and architectural spaces according to the UD principles make products and environments usable to the greatest extent by people with diverse abilities. The important thing is that the student designers should involve people with disabilities with an increased awareness and without any discrimination and stigmatization of users in their designs. This could be achieved by gaining empathy toward people with disabilities’ as well as their needs, problems, and expectations from the environment or products in design studio process. In this respect, the purpose of this study is to explore the empathic design (ED) approach as a design learning and experiential tool in interior architecture education regarding the pedagogical outcomes and process assessment of ED. So, the main aim of this study is to investigate the role of three ED techniques on undergraduate interior architecture students’ UD solutions in the design process. To explore the effects of building empathy and its reflections in design studio process, it investigates how experiencing ED process has an impact on students’ empathy level, decision making process and perceptions of learning experience.

[1]  Katja Hölttä-Otto,et al.  Conceptualization and operationalization of empathy in design research , 2022, Design Studies.

[2]  A. Dong,et al.  To empathise or not to empathise? Empathy and its limits in design , 2019, Design Studies.

[3]  Sana Boudhraâ,et al.  Co-ideation critique unfolded: an exploratory study of a co-design studio ‘crit’ based on the students’ experience , 2019, CoDesign.

[4]  Lilia Gomez-Lanier.  The Role of Empathy in Experiential Learning: A Case Study of Empathy as an Interior Design Learning Tool , 2018 .

[5]  H. Mulligan,et al.  Inclusive design in architectural practice: Experiential learning of disability in architectural education. , 2017, Disability and health journal.

[6]  Burçak Altay.  Developing empathy towards older adults in design , 2017 .

[7]  Burçak Altay,et al.  Embracing student experience in inclusive design education through learner-centred instruction , 2016 .

[8]  N. Fila,et al.  The manifestation of empathy within design: findings from a service-learning course , 2016 .

[9]  Deana McDonagh,et al.  Design students foreseeing the unforeseeable: Practicebased empathic research methods , 2015 .

[10]  Asli Sungur Ergenoglu,et al.  Universal Design Teaching in Architectural Education , 2015 .

[11]  Halime Demirkan,et al.  Inclusive design: developing students' knowledge and attitude through empathic modelling , 2014 .

[12]  Asli Sungur Ergenoglu,et al.  Accessibility Awareness among Architecture Students: Design Thinking Evaluations in Yildiz Technical University , 2013 .

[13]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[14]  Yanki Lee,et al.  Empathy @ design research: a phenomenological study on young people experiencing participatory design for social inclusion , 2011 .

[15]  Megan Strickfaden,et al.  Empathy through Accumulating Techné: Designing an Accessible Metro , 2011 .

[16]  P. Stappers,et al.  Achieving empathy with users: the effects of different sources of information , 2011 .

[17]  Deana McDonagh,et al.  Disability + Relevant Design: Empathic Design Strategies Supporting More Effective New Product Design Outcomes , 2010 .

[18]  Hua Dong,et al.  Strategies for teaching inclusive design , 2010 .

[19]  Yasemin Afacan,et al.  A priority-based approach for satisfying the diverse users’ needs, capabilities and expectations: a universal kitchen design case , 2010 .

[20]  Nilgün Olguntürk,et al.  Ergonomics and universal design in interior architecture education , 2009 .

[21]  Merlijn Kouprie,et al.  A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user's life , 2009 .

[22]  D. McDonagh,et al.  Visual Narrative Research Methods as Performance in Industrial Design Education , 2009 .

[23]  Halime Demirkan,et al.  Learning Styles of Design Students and the Relationship of Academic Performance and Gender in Design Education , 2007 .

[24]  Halime Demirkan,et al.  Universal product design involving elderly users: a participatory design model. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[25]  Halime Demirkan,et al.  Focus on architectural design process through learning styles , 2003 .

[26]  Jane Fulton Suri,et al.  The next 50 years: future challenges and opportunities for empathy in our science , 2001 .

[27]  Halime Demirkan,et al.  A Framework for the Design Studio in Web‐Based Education , 2001 .

[28]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[29]  J. Rayport,et al.  Spark innovation through empathic design. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[30]  Halime Demirkan,et al.  An Experiential Study on Empathic Design in Interior Architecture Education , 2019 .

[31]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Beyond surface knowledge: An Exploration of How Empathic Design Techniques Enhances Engineers Understanding of Users’ Needs , 2016 .

[32]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Enriching our understanding of architecture through disability experience , 2013 .

[33]  Elif Helvacioglu,et al.  Awareness of the Concept of Universal Design in Design Education , 2012 .

[34]  Megan Strickfaden,et al.  Empathic design research: Moving towards a new mode of industrial design education , 2011 .

[35]  Yasemin Afacan,et al.  A computer assisted universal design (CAUD) plug-in tool for architectural design process , 2008 .

[36]  Belkis Uluoǧlu,et al.  Design knowledge communicated in studio critiques , 2000 .

[37]  Donald A. Schön.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[38]  Mark H. Davis.  Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[39]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy , 1980 .

[40]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .