Effectiveness, safety and quality of life of trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Real‐world data from the noninterventional TACTIC study in Germany
暂无分享,去创建一个
T. Decker | F. Hartmann | M. Welslau | I. Schwaner | J. Uhlig | A. Nusch | R. Liersch | G. Kojouharoff | M. Frank | N. Marschner | K. Potthoff | H. Kröning | H. Harich | Harald-Robert Bruch | A. Sauer | R. Grunewald | M. Grundeis | J. Lipke | U. Vehling‐Kaiser | T. Göhler | T. Reisländer | C. Hogrefe | E. Moorahrend | D. Semsek | Marcel Stephany | R. de Buhr
[1] E. Van Cutsem,et al. Trifluridine-Tipiracil and Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. , 2023, The New England journal of medicine.
[2] N. Normanno,et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. , 2022, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[3] V. Heinemann,et al. Efficacy, safety and quality-of-life data from patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving trifluridine/tipiracil: results of the TALLISUR trial , 2022, ESMO open.
[4] R. López-López,et al. Early Clinical Experience with Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The ROS Study , 2021, Cancers.
[5] P. Jiménez-Fonseca,et al. Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data , 2021, Scientific Reports.
[6] J. Tabernero,et al. Trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for third-line management of metastatic colorectal cancer: SUNLIGHT study design. , 2021, Future oncology.
[7] A. Jemal,et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[8] S. Mohile,et al. Using machine learning to identify older adults at high risk for hospitalization and mortality via the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). , 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology.
[9] E. Van Cutsem,et al. Effect of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients treated in RECOURSE by prognostic factors at baseline: an exploratory analysis , 2020, ESMO Open.
[10] E. Van Cutsem,et al. Safety, efficacy and patient-reported outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the PRECONNECT study , 2020, ESMO Open.
[11] W. Cheung,et al. Quality of life in a real-world study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with trifluridine/tipiracil. , 2020, Current oncology.
[12] Versione,et al. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events , 2020, Definitions.
[13] T. Yoshino,et al. Retrospective cohort study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer , 2019, BMC Cancer.
[14] A. Fernández Montes,et al. Efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line and beyond for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice: patterns of use and prognostic nomogram , 2019, Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico.
[15] P. Pfeiffer,et al. A systematic review of observational studies of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) for metastatic colorectal cancer , 2019, Acta oncologica.
[16] G. Prager,et al. Beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[17] E. Van Cutsem,et al. The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 2017, European journal of cancer.
[18] Tae Won Kim,et al. Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Monotherapy in Asian Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The TERRA Study. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[19] F. Ciardiello,et al. Present and future of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: A review of new candidate targets , 2017, World journal of gastroenterology.
[20] S. Kubicka,et al. Treatment decisions in metastatic colorectal cancer - Beyond first and second line combination therapies. , 2017, Cancer treatment reviews.
[21] U. Jaehde,et al. Validation of the German patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE™). , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[22] Ching-yi Wu,et al. Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation , 2016, Quality of Life Research.
[23] Amy P Abernethy,et al. Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). , 2015, JAMA oncology.
[24] Marc Peeters,et al. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.
[25] N. Sugimoto,et al. TAS-102 monotherapy for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.
[26] G. Bonsel,et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.
[27] K. Do,et al. Presalvage prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) and PSA doubling time as predictors of biochemical failure of salvage cryotherapy in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy , 2006, Cancer.
[28] E. Kaplan,et al. Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .
[29] Joseph P. Near,et al. How to cite this article , 2011 .