Towards Co-Located TSCH Networks: An Inter-Network Interference Perspective

The future Internet of Things (IoT) is expected to be dense with multiple independently administered co-located wireless sensor networks operating in close proximity, especially in e-health and industrial automotive applications. Recent advances in wireless technologies and standards for IoT communication such as IEEE 802.15.4, WLAN, ZigBEE, and WirelessHART make use of unlicensed bands and several networks may co-exist in close locations. This results co-located networks acting as interferer and interference victim for one another, hence affecting network reliability and energy costs. In this regard, the case of IEEE 802.15.4-time-slotted channel hopping (TSCH) protocol is of particular importance because of its widespread acceptance as a reliable MAC layer protocol for industrial low-power IoT. This paper studies closely co-located TSCH networks from the interference perspective and shows how it impacts the network performance in terms of successful communication and periodic communication blockage. Our results demonstrate that co-located TSCH networks periodically interfere with one another if they do not cooperate. The impact of inter-network interference can be reduced when there are less time-sources. Exploiting 16 channels of the IEEE 802.15.4-TSCH with channel hopping mechanism greatly reduces inter-network interference.

[1]  Ridha Soua,et al.  Multichannel assignment protocols in wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive survey , 2015, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[2]  Mesut Günes,et al.  Service management platform to support service migrations for IoT smart city applications , 2017, 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[3]  Siarhei Kuryla,et al.  RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks , 2010 .

[4]  Maria Rita Palattella,et al.  Using IEEE 802.15.4e Time-Slotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) in the Internet of Things (IoT): Problem Statement , 2015, RFC.

[5]  T. Tsvetkov RPL : IPv 6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks , 2010 .

[6]  Matteo Bertocco,et al.  Experimental Study of Coexistence Issues Between IEEE 802.11b and IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[7]  Andrzej Duda,et al.  Energy consumption and performance of IEEE 802.15.4e TSCH and DSME , 2016, 2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[8]  Falko Dressler,et al.  Effects and Implications of Beacon Collisions in Co-Located IEEE 802.15.4 Networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[9]  Cintia B. Margi,et al.  IEEE 802.15.4e TSCH Mode Performance Analysis , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS).

[10]  Fabrice Theoleyre,et al.  Performance study of co-located IEEE 802.15.4-TSCH networks: Interference and coexistence , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC).

[12]  Adam Dunkels,et al.  Contiki - a lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors , 2004, 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[13]  Xavier Vilajosana,et al.  Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration , 2013 .

[14]  Thomas Watteyne,et al.  Adaptive Synchronization in IEEE802.15.4e Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.