Posing the question of whether the precautionary principle has a role in risk assessment effectively constrains any debate of the issue within a framework predicated on the assumption that application of risk assessment is inevitable in the formulation of regulatory decisions. The question can equally validly be expressed in terms of whether there is a role for risk assessment in the formulation of precautionary legislation. This allows the debate then to turn on consideration of two questions: Firstly, does the precautionary principle have a role in policy development? and secondly, is this role consistent and compatible with a risk based approach to regulation? When recast in these terms, a more holistic comparison of the aims and objectives of both approaches and of their relative power in the formulation of regulation becomes possible. This leads to the conclusion that the precautionary principle is, when defined and applied correctly, scientifically more robust than risk assessment. Precautionary app...
[1]
Michael Power,et al.
Environmental risk assessment within a decision-making framework
,
1997
.
[2]
Brian L. Murphy.
Dealing with Uncertainty in Risk Assessment
,
1998
.
[3]
Susan P. Felter,et al.
The Inexact Science of Risk Assessment (and Implications for Risk Management)
,
1998
.
[4]
John Harris,et al.
Precautionary principle stifles discovery
,
1999,
Nature.
[5]
John S. Gray,et al.
Towards a scientific definition of the precautionary principle
,
1996
.
[6]
John S. Gray,et al.
Statistics and the precautionary principle
,
1990
.