Segregation in Urban Space: A New Measurement Approach

A variety of segregation measures have been proposed in the literature with the dissimilarity index and its variants being the most widely applied. While these measures provide a quick means of comparing segregation patterns across space and time, they are not linked to the processes that generate and maintain segregative patterns. This paper proposes a new method for measuring segregation. The method is based on comparative evaluations of neighbourhood characteristics as a determinant of spatial behaviour in cities. The proposed approach moves away from a purely geometric interpretation of segregation by anchoring the measurement of segregation into the actual urban setting. The method's main advantages are its responsiveness to changes in urban characteristics (e.g. spatial variations in rent increases), and changes in preference structures (e.g. a declining importance of distance as an impediment to relocation). A numerical example is used to demonstrate the behaviour of the proposed method against traditional segregation measures. The results indicate that the segregation experiences of minorities may be more severe than previously thought.

[1]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[2]  W. Wilson,et al.  The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, The Underclass, and Public Policy. , 1988 .

[3]  G. Galster Residential segregation and interracial economic disparities: A simultaneous-equations approach , 1987 .

[4]  W. Clark Residential segregation in American cities: Common ground and differences in interpretation , 1989 .

[5]  M. Hughes FORMATION OF THE IMPACTED GHETTO: EVIDENCE FROM LARGE METROPOLITAN AREAS, 1970-1980 , 1990 .

[6]  The Segregation of Socioeconomic Groups in Urban Areas: a Comment , 1979 .

[7]  A. Abbott,et al.  On "The Measurement of Spatial Segregation" , 1984, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Bert Kestenbaum Notes on the Index of Dissimilarity: A Research Note , 1980 .

[9]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  An Asymmetrical Approach to Segregation , 1981 .

[10]  B. Waldorf Housing Policy Impacts on Ethnic Segregation Patterns: Evidence from Dusseldorf, West Germany , 1990 .

[11]  William A. V. Clark,et al.  An Empirical Test of a Joint Model of Residential Mobility and Housing Choice , 1985 .

[12]  Marcelinus Henry Menori,et al.  Residential Segregation , 2019 .

[13]  John F. Jakubs A distance-based segregation index , 1981 .

[14]  Christopher Winship,et al.  The Desirability of Using the Index of Dissimilarity or any Adjustment of It for Measuring Segregation: Reply to Falk, Cortese, and Cohen , 1978 .

[15]  B. Morgan,et al.  An Alternate Approach to the Development of a Distance-Based Measure of Racial Segregation. , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[17]  M. Hughes MISSPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER: A GEOGRAPHICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE "UNDERCLASS" FALLACY* , 1989 .

[18]  Christopher Winship,et al.  A Revaluation of Indexes of Residential Segregation , 1977 .

[19]  Jack K. Cohen,et al.  Utilizing Standardized Indices of Residential Segregation: Comment on Winship , 1978 .

[20]  William A. V. Clark,et al.  Residential segregation in American cities: a review and interpretation , 1986 .

[21]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  A METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SEGREGATION INDEXES , 1955 .