Smearing scale in Laguerre reconstructions of the correlation function

To a good approximation, on large cosmological scales the evolved two-point correlation function of biased tracers is related to the initial one by a convolution. For Gaussian initial conditions, the smearing kernel is Gaussian, so if the initial correlation function is parametrized using simple polynomials then the evolved correlation function is a sum of generalized Laguerre functions of halfinteger order. This motivates an analytic ‘Laguerre reconstruction’ algorithm which previous work has shown is fast and accurate. This reconstruction requires as input the width of the smearing kernel. We show that the method can be extended to estimate the width of the smearing kernel from the same dataset. This estimate, and associated uncertainties, can then be used to marginalize over the distribution of reconstructed shapes, and hence provide error estimates on the value of the distance scale which are not tied to a particular cosmological model. We also show that if, instead, we parametrize the evolved correlation function using simple polynomials, then the initial one is a sum of Hermite polynomials, again enabling fast and accurate deconvolution. If one is willing to use constraints on the smearing scale from other datasets, then marginalizing over its value is simpler for Hermite reconstruction, potentially providing further speed-up in cosmological analyses.

[1]  C. Carbone,et al.  The effects of massive neutrinos on the linear point of the correlation function , 2020, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

[2]  M. Zaldarriaga,et al.  Combining full-shape and BAO analyses of galaxy power spectra: a 1.6% CMB-independent constraint on H0 , 2020, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

[3]  Ana Maria Delgado,et al.  The Quijote Simulations , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[4]  E. Branchini,et al.  BAO reconstruction: a swift numerical action method for massive spectroscopic surveys , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[5]  M. White,et al.  The impact of wrong assumptions in BAO reconstruction , 2018, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

[6]  R. Sheth,et al.  Beating non-linearities: improving the baryon acoustic oscillations with the linear point , 2015, 1508.01170.

[7]  Ashley J. Ross,et al.  The clustering of the SDSS DR7 Main Galaxy Sample I: a 4 per cent distance measure at z=0.15 , 2014, 1409.3242.

[8]  A. Cuesta,et al.  A 2 per cent distance to $z$=0.35 by reconstructing baryon acoustic oscillations - I. Methods and application to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2012, 1202.0090.

[9]  I. Zehavi,et al.  Galaxy Evolution from Halo Occupation Distribution Modeling of DEEP2 and SDSS Galaxy Clustering , 2007, astro-ph/0703457.

[10]  R. Nichol,et al.  The Galaxy Luminosity Function and Luminosity Density at Redshift z = 0.1 , 2002, astro-ph/0210215.

[11]  S. Bharadwaj The Evolution of Correlation Functions in the Zeldovich Approximation and Its Implications for the Validity of Perturbation Theory , 1996, astro-ph/9606121.

[12]  F. Villaescusa-Navarro,et al.  Constraining M ν with the bispectrum. Part II. The information content of the galaxy bispectrum monopole , 2021, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.