Averaged Relative Motion and Applications to Formation Flight Near Perturbed Orbits

DOI: 10.2514/1.30620 This paper presents expressions for describing averaged relative motion between two satellites in neighboring orbits around an oblate planet. The theory assumes small relative distances between the satellites, but is uniformly valid for all elliptic orbits as well as the special case of a circular reference orbit by the use of nonsingular orbital elements. These expressions are useful when the short-periodic variations in relative position and velocity are of limited interest and, instead, the time-averaged behavior of the states is sought. The averaged expressions also provide insight into the effects of an oblate planet on bounded relative motion. For example, a bias term due to oblateness effects, hitherto unreported, has been identified in the radial position, which can be accounted for in the reference trajectory. Application of these expressions is shown in the derivation of an analytical filter that removes short-periodic variations in relative states without the use of tuned numerical filters, one for each frequency of interest,whicharenormallyusedfordisturbanceaccommodationincontrolsystemdesign.Theuseofthisanalytical filter is demonstrated for formation keeping on a prescribed relative trajectory.

[1]  Kaare Aksnes,et al.  A note on ‘The main problem of satellite theory for small eccentricities, by A. Deprit and A. Rom, 1970’ , 1971 .

[2]  Felix R. Hoots,et al.  Reformulation of the Brouwer geopotential theory for improved computational efficiency , 1981 .

[3]  Kyle T. Alfriend,et al.  Nonlinear Considerations In Satellite Formation Flying , 2002 .

[4]  R. H. Lyddane Small eccentricities or inclinations in the Brouwer theory of the artificial satellite , 1963 .

[5]  J. Junkins,et al.  On the analogy between orbital dynamics and rigid body dynamics. , 1980 .

[6]  Dirk Brouwer,et al.  SOLUTION OF THE PROBLEM OF ARTIFICIAL SATELLITE THEORY WITHOUT DRAG , 1959 .

[7]  R. Broucke,et al.  Solution of the Elliptic Rendezvous Problem with the Time as Independent Variable , 2003 .

[8]  K. Alfriend,et al.  State Transition Matrix of Relative Motion for the Perturbed Noncircular Reference Orbit , 2003 .

[9]  R. Broucke,et al.  On the equinoctial orbit elements , 1972 .

[10]  D. Richardson,et al.  A THIRD-ORDER ANALYTICAL SOLUTION FOR RELATIVE MOTION WITH A CIRCULAR REFERENCE ORBIT , 2003 .

[11]  D. Vallado Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .

[12]  O. K. Smith Computation of coordinates from Brouwer's solution of the artificial satellite problem , 1961 .

[13]  An Analytical Solution for Relative Motion of Satellites , 2005 .

[14]  André Deprit,et al.  The main problem of artificial satellite theory for small and moderate eccentricities , 1970 .

[15]  R. Sedwick,et al.  High-Fidelity Linearized J Model for Satellite Formation Flight , 2002 .

[16]  R. Battin An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics , 1987 .

[17]  S. R. Vadali,et al.  An intelligent control concept for formation flying satellites , 2002 .

[18]  Felix R. Hoots,et al.  Theory of the motion of an artificial Earth satellite , 1981 .

[19]  S. Vadali,et al.  Relative Motion and the Geometry of Formations in Keplerian Elliptic Orbits with Arbitrary Eccentricity , 2007 .

[20]  P. Gurfil Generalized solutions for relative spacecraft orbits under arbitrary perturbations , 2007 .

[21]  Yoshihide Kozai,et al.  The motion of a close earth satellite , 1959 .

[22]  Kaare Aksnes,et al.  On the use of the Hill variables in artificial satellite theory - Brouwer's theory. , 1972 .

[23]  Shannon L. Coffey,et al.  Third-Order Solution to the Main Problem in Satellite Theory , 1982 .

[24]  Andre Deprit,et al.  The Main Problem in the Theory of Artificial Satellites to Order Four , 1981 .

[25]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Optimal Control , 1986 .

[26]  W. H. Clohessy,et al.  Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous , 2012 .

[27]  Prasenjit Sengupta,et al.  Periodic relative motion near a keplerian elliptic orbit with nonlinear differential gravity , 2006 .

[28]  T. Carter State Transition Matrices for Terminal Rendezvous Studies: Brief Survey and New Example , 1998 .

[29]  Y. Kozai Note on the Motion of a Close Earth Satellite , 1961 .

[30]  Derek F Lawden,et al.  Optimal trajectories for space navigation , 1964 .

[31]  H. Schaub,et al.  J2 Invariant Relative Orbits for Spacecraft Formations , 2001 .

[32]  D. D. Mueller,et al.  Fundamentals of Astrodynamics , 1971 .

[33]  David B. Goldstein,et al.  An analytical theory for orbit determination , 2001 .

[34]  P. Gurfil,et al.  Canonical Modelling of Relative Spacecraft Motion Via Epicyclic Orbital Elements , 2005 .

[35]  W. M. Kaula Theory of satellite geodesy , 1966 .

[36]  Prasenjit Sengupta,et al.  Second-order state transition for relative motion near perturbed, elliptic orbits , 2007 .

[37]  S. Vadali,et al.  Formation Flying: Accommodating Nonlinearity and Eccentricity Perturbations , 2003 .

[38]  G. Hill Researches in the Lunar Theory , 1878 .

[39]  Jean Albert Kechichian,et al.  Motion in General Elliptic Orbit with Respect to a Dragging and Precessing Coordinate Frame , 1998 .

[40]  Kyle T. Alfriend,et al.  Satellite Relative Motion Using Differential Equinoctial Elements , 2005 .