The Participatory Vulnerability Scoping Diagram: Deliberative Risk Ranking for Community Water Systems

Natural hazards and climate change present growing challenges to community water system (CWS) managers, who are increasingly turning to vulnerability assessments to identify, prioritize, and adapt to risks. Effectively assessing CWS vulnerability requires information and participation from various sources, one of which is stakeholders. In this article, we present a deliberative risk-ranking methodology, the participatory vulnerability scoping diagram (P-VSD), which allows rapid assessment and integration of multiple stakeholder perspectives of vulnerability. This technique is based on methods of deliberative risk evaluation and the vulnerability scoping diagram. The goal of the methodology is to engage CWS managers and stakeholders collectively to provide qualitative contextual risk rankings as a first step in a vulnerability assessment. We conduct an initial assessment using a case study of CWS in two U.S. counties, sites with broadly similar exposures but differences in population, land use, and other social sensitivity factors. Results demonstrate that CWS managers and stakeholders in the two case study communities all share the belief that their CWS are vulnerable to hazards but differ in how this vulnerability manifests itself in terms of the exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity of the system.

[1]  Dan G. Erwin,et al.  Understanding Risk , 2002, Inf. Secur. J. A Glob. Perspect..

[2]  Matthew A. Wilson,et al.  A Theoretical Approach to Deliberative Valuation: Aggregation by Mutual Consent , 2006, Land Economics.

[3]  M. Morgan,et al.  Categorizing Risks for Risk Ranking , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Christopher B. Barrett,et al.  Participatory Risk Mapping for Targeting Research and Assistance: With an Example from East African Pastoralists , 1999 .

[5]  Nathan J. Wood,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment of a Port and Harbor Community to Earthquake and Tsunami Hazards: Integrating Technical Expert and Stakeholder Input , 2002 .

[6]  Ellen C. England,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Water Vulnerability Assessment Methodologies , 2006 .

[7]  J. Retana to Climate Change , 2012 .

[8]  N. Wood,et al.  Stakeholder perspectives on land-use strategies for adapting to climate-change-enhanced coastal hazards: Sarasota, Florida , 2010 .

[9]  medolbec Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change , 2010 .

[10]  Christine L. Jocoy,et al.  Why worry? Community water system managers’ perceptions of climate vulnerability , 2007 .

[11]  Brent Yarnal,et al.  Putting adaptive capacity into the context of people’s lives: a case study of two flood-prone communities in Puerto Rico , 2010 .

[12]  Jacqueline de Chazal,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability : Working Group II contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2014 .

[13]  Nancy L. Barber,et al.  Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005 , 2009 .

[14]  Brent Yarnal,et al.  Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: The vulnerability scoping diagram , 2007 .

[15]  T. Cannon,et al.  Community level adaptation to climate change: The potential role of participatory community risk assessment , 2008 .

[16]  H. Pearsall Linking the stressors and stressing the linkages: Human—environment vulnerability and brownfield redevelopment in New York City , 2009 .

[17]  Alex Coletti,et al.  A support system for assessing local vulnerability to weather and climate , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[18]  B Fischhoff,et al.  A Deliberative Method for Ranking Risks (I): Overview and Test Bed Development , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  Технология,et al.  National Climatic Data Center , 2011 .

[20]  Billie Turner,et al.  Contested Identities: Human-Environment Geography and Disciplinary Implications in a Restructuring Academy , 2002 .

[21]  WEATHER AND CLIMATE EXTREMES, CLIMATE CHANGE, AND PLANNING: Views of Community Water System Managers in Pennsylvania's Susquehanna River Basin 1 , 1999 .

[22]  Martijn Gough Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[23]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Democratizing Risk Management: Successful Public Involvement in Local Water Management Decisions , 1999 .

[24]  P. Howe Hurricane preparedness as anticipatory adaptation: A case study of community businesses , 2011 .

[25]  S. Brody,et al.  Hurricane risk perceptions among Florida's single family homeowners , 2005 .

[26]  Jennifer Phillips,et al.  Communication and Mental Processes: Experimental and Analytic Processing of Uncertain Climate Information , 2007 .

[27]  Christine L. Jocoy,et al.  Feeling at Risk Matters: Water Managers and the Decision to Use Forecasts , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  Susanne Becken,et al.  A climate change vulnerability assessment methodology for coastal tourism , 2009 .

[29]  Petra Tschakert,et al.  Views from the vulnerable: Understanding climatic and other stressors in the Sahel , 2007 .