Data Envelopment Analysis for Composite Indicators: A Multiple Layer Model

The development of a composite indicator (CI) over a set of individual indicators is worthwhile in case the methodological aggregation process is sound and the results are clear. It can then be used as a powerful tool for performance evaluation, benchmarking, and decision making. In this respect, data envelopment analysis (DEA), as a self appraisal technique, has recently received considerable attention in the construction of CIs for policy analysis and public communication. However, due to the ever increasing complexity of numerous performance evaluation problems, more and more potential indicators might be developed to represent an evaluation activity in a more comprehensive way. These indicators might also belong to different categories and further be linked to one another constituting a multilayer hierarchical structure. Simply treating all the indicators to be in the same layer as is the case in the basic DEA model thereby ignores the information on their hierarchical structure, and further leads up to weak discriminating power and unrealistic weight allocations. To overcome this limitation, a multiple layer DEA-based CI model is developed in this study to embody a hierarchical structure of indicators in the DEA framework, and both its primal and dual form are realized. The proposed model is illustrated by constructing a composite road safety performance index for a set of European countries.

[1]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental Performance : an Index Number Approach , 2004 .

[2]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[3]  Geert Wets,et al.  A generalized multiple layer data envelopment analysis model , 2009 .

[4]  J. W. Senders,et al.  HUMAN ERROR IN ROAD ACCIDENTS , 1999 .

[5]  Martijn Vis,et al.  Road Safety Performance Indicators: Theory. Deliverable D3.6 of the EU FP6 project SafetyNet. , 2007 .

[6]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[7]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[8]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Composite indicators for security of energy supply using ordered weighted averaging , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Measuring human development via data envelopment analysis: the case of Asia and the Pacific , 2005 .

[10]  Martijn Vis,et al.  Building the European Road Safety Observatory. SafetyNet. Deliverable D3.11a Road safety performance indicators : updated country comparisons , 2006 .

[11]  Willem Moesen,et al.  Towards a synthetic indicator of macroeconomic performance: Unequal weighting when limited information is available , 1991 .

[12]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators , 2007 .

[13]  Tom Brijs,et al.  Road safety risk evaluation and target setting using data envelopment analysis and its extensions. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development , 2005 .

[15]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS for road safety performance evaluation , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[16]  Geert Wets,et al.  A generalized multiple layer data envelopment analysis model for hierarchical structure assessment: A case study in road safety performance evaluation , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  篠原 正明,et al.  William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Kaoru Tone 著, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000年, 318頁 , 2002 .

[18]  C. Lovell,et al.  One Market, One Number? A Composite Indicator Assessment of EU Internal Market Dynamics , 2005 .

[19]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies , 2009 .

[20]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Incorporating Value Judgments in DEA , 2004 .

[21]  Elke Hermans,et al.  A methodology for developing a composite road safety performance index for cross-coountry comparison , 2009 .

[22]  J R Treat,et al.  TRI-LEVEL STUDY OF THE CAUSES OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS. VOLUME II: SPECIAL ANALYSES , 1977 .

[23]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators , 2007 .

[24]  Geert Wets,et al.  A hybrid system of neural networks and rough sets for road safety performance indicators , 2010, Soft Comput..

[25]  A. Charnes,et al.  The non-archimedean CCR ratio for efficiency analysis: A rejoinder to Boyd and Färe☆ , 1984 .

[26]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Evaluating the comparative performance of countries of the Middle East and North Africa: A DEA application , 2006 .

[27]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..