Study of the effect of DMSO on VOS odour production in a wastewater plant.

Odours caused by volatile organic sulphides (VOS) have a history spanning over 20 years for Philadelphia's Northeast Water Pollution Control Plant (NEWPCP). A "canned corn" type of odour has caused residential complaints. Traditional odour control approaches based on hydrogen sulphide failed. This study confirmed that dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) from a chemical facility was the dominant cause of the "canned corn" nuisance odour in the form of dimethyl sulphide (DMS). During a discharge, DMSO concentrations up to 12 mg/L were found in the influent of the NEWPCP. Each DMSO concentration peak induced a DMS peak. DMS concentrations increased from less than 50 microg/L to 6 mg/L with a corresponding decrease in DMSO. Approximately 79% of DMSO from the primary sedimentation influent was passed to the effluent, and to downstream processes, such as the aeration tanks where the DMS was volatilised by the aeration. The DMS partial pressure in ambient air of NEWPCP can be between 0.03 and 0.18 x 10(-3) atm during a DMSO discharge. From the above information, the potential of VOS production is estimated and a practical plan for remediation can be designed.

[1]  J. Novak,et al.  Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) waste residues and municipal waste water odor by dimethyl sulfide (DMS): the north-east WPCP plant of Philadelphia. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Jeyong Yoon,et al.  Kinetics and mechanisms of DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide) degradation by UV/H2O2 process , 2004 .

[3]  G A Burlingame,et al.  Development of an odor wheel classification scheme for wastewater. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  Thomas G Chasteen,et al.  Environmental VOSCs--formation and degradation of dimethyl sulfide, methanethiol and related materials. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[5]  K. Finster,et al.  Formation of dimethylsulfide and methanethiol from methoxylated aromatic compounds and inorganic sulfide by newly isolated anaerobic bacteria , 1992, Archives of Microbiology.

[6]  G. Daigger,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF ODOR FORMATION MECHANISMS IN AN ACTIVATED SLUDGE BASIN AT THE NORTHEAST WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT , 2004 .

[7]  Hyung-Joon Seo,et al.  Biological treatment of wastewater containing dimethyl sulphoxide from the semi-conductor industry , 2001 .

[8]  J. Hansen.  Inactivation of MXR1 Abolishes Formation of Dimethyl Sulfide from Dimethyl Sulfoxide inSaccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  G. Vogels,et al.  Anaerobic versus Aerobic Degradation of Dimethyl Sulfide and Methanethiol in Anoxic Freshwater Sediments , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  G. Burlingame.  Odor profiling of environmental odors , 1999 .

[11]  O. Lev,et al.  DMS Formation by Dimethylsulfoniopropionate Route in Freshwater , 1998 .

[12]  M. Zahniser,et al.  Henry's law solubilities and Śetchenow coefficients for biogenic reduced sulfur species obtained from gas‐liquid uptake measurements , 1995 .

[13]  G. A. Burton,et al.  Widespread occurrence of bacterial thiol methyltransferases and the biogenic emission of methylated sulfur gases , 1987, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  P. Wood.  The redox potential for dimethyl sulphoxide reduction to dimethyl sulphide , 1981, FEBS letters.