Acoustic full waveform inversion of synthetic land and marine data in the Laplace domain

Elastic waves, such as Rayleigh and mode-converted waves, together with amplitude versus offset variations, serve as noise in full waveform inversion using the acoustic approximation. Heavy preprocessing must be applied to remove elastic effects to invert land or marine data using the acoustic inversion method in the time or frequency domains. Full waveform inversion using the elastic wave equation should be one alternative; however, multi-parameter inversion is expensive and sensitive to the starting velocity model. We implement full acoustic waveform inversion of synthetic land and marine data in the Laplace domain with minimum preprocessing (i.e., muting) to remove elastic effects. The damping in the Laplace transform can be thought of as an automatic time windowing. Numerical examples show that Laplace-domain acoustic inversion can yield correct smooth velocity models even with the noise originating from elastic waves. This offers the opportunity to develop an accurate smooth starting model for subsequent inversion in the frequency domain.

[1]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  Wave propagation near a fluid-solid interface : A spectral-element approach , 2000 .

[2]  P. Mora Nonlinear two-dimensional elastic inversion of multioffset seismic data , 1987 .

[3]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[4]  Changsoo Shin,et al.  Free-Surface Boundary Condition in Finite-Difference Elastic Wave Modeling , 2004 .

[5]  Jean Virieux,et al.  Multiscale imaging of complex structures from multifold wide-aperture seismic data by frequency-domain full-waveform tomography: application to a thrust belt , 2004 .

[6]  Kagan Tuncay,et al.  Time domain Gauss—Newton seismic waveform inversion in elastic media , 2006 .

[7]  Mark Noble,et al.  Robust elastic nonlinear waveform inversion: Application to real data , 1990 .

[8]  Hicks,et al.  Gauss–Newton and full Newton methods in frequency–space seismic waveform inversion , 1998 .

[9]  R. Gerhard Pratt,et al.  Efficient waveform inversion and imaging: A strategy for selecting temporal frequencies , 2004 .

[10]  Jean Virieux,et al.  Quantitative imaging of complex structures from dense wide‐aperture seismic data by multiscale traveltime and waveform inversions: a case study , 2004 .

[11]  Changsoo Shin,et al.  Waveform inversion using a logarithmic wavefield , 2006 .

[12]  C. Shin,et al.  Waveform inversion in the Laplace domain , 2008 .

[13]  A. Tarantola Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation , 1984 .

[14]  R. G. Pratt,et al.  Full waveform tomography for lithospheric imaging: results from a blind test in a realistic crustal model , 2007 .

[15]  C. Shin,et al.  Improved amplitude preservation for prestack depth migration by inverse scattering theory , 2001 .

[16]  Fabio Rocca,et al.  SEG/EAEG 3-D modeling project: 2nd update , 1994 .

[17]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[18]  Changsoo Shin,et al.  Comparison of waveform inversion, part 1: conventional wavefield vs logarithmic wavefield , 2007 .

[19]  A. Levander Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms , 1988 .

[20]  C. Shin,et al.  Two‐dimensional waveform inversion of multi‐component data in acoustic‐elastic coupled media , 2008 .