Impact of Assimilation on Heavy Rainfall Simulations Using WRF Model: Sensitivity of Assimilation Results to Background Error Statistics

Data assimilation is considered as one of the effective tools for improving forecast skill of mesoscale models. However, for optimum utilization and effective assimilation of observations, many factors need to be taken into account while designing data assimilation methodology. One of the critical components that determines the amount and propagation observation information into the analysis, is model background error statistics (BES). The objective of this study is to quantify how BES in data assimilation impacts on simulation of heavy rainfall events over a southern state in India, Karnataka. Simulations of 40 heavy rainfall events were carried out using Weather Research and Forecasting Model with and without data assimilation. The assimilation experiments were conducted using global and regional BES while the experiment with no assimilation was used as the baseline for assessing the impact of data assimilation. The simulated rainfall is verified against high-resolution rain-gage observations over Karnataka. Statistical evaluation using several accuracy and skill measures shows that data assimilation has improved the heavy rainfall simulation. Our results showed that the experiment using regional BES outperformed the one which used global BES. Critical thermo-dynamic variables conducive for heavy rainfall like convective available potential energy simulated using regional BES is more realistic compared to global BES. It is pointed out that these results have important practical implications in design of forecast platforms while decision-making during extreme weather events

[1]  J. Dudhia Numerical Study of Convection Observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment Using a Mesoscale Two-Dimensional Model , 1989 .

[2]  John Derber,et al.  The National Meteorological Center's spectral-statistical interpolation analysis system , 1992 .

[3]  F. Giorgi,et al.  A Investigation of the Sensitivity of Simulated Precipitation to Model Resolution and Its Implications for Climate Studies , 1996 .

[4]  D. Short,et al.  Evidence from Tropical Raindrop Spectra of the Origin of Rain from Stratiform versus Convective Clouds , 1996 .

[5]  N. Seaman,et al.  A Comparison Study of Convective Parameterization Schemes in a Mesoscale Model , 1997 .

[6]  E. Mlawer,et al.  Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave , 1997 .

[7]  B Wang,et al.  Data assimilation and its applications. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Xuebin Zhang,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Heavy Precipitation Events over Canada , 2001 .

[9]  R. Purser,et al.  Three-Dimensional Variational Analysis with Spatially Inhomogeneous Covariances , 2002 .

[10]  K. Ide,et al.  A Method for Assimilation of Lagrangian Data , 2003 .

[11]  Ming-Jen Yang,et al.  Evaluation of Rainfall Forecasts over Taiwan by Four Cumulus Parameterization Schemes , 2003 .

[12]  J. Dudhia,et al.  2 A IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION OF THE UNIFIED NOAH LAND SURFACE MODEL IN THE WRF MODEL , 2003 .

[13]  J. Geleyn,et al.  The definition of mesoscale selective forecast error covariances for a limited area variational analysis , 2003 .

[14]  John S. Kain,et al.  The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update , 2004 .

[15]  Wei Huang,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation System for MM5: Implementation and Initial Results , 2004 .

[16]  U. C. Mohanty,et al.  Some characteristics of very heavy rainfall over Orissa during summer monsoon season , 2005 .

[17]  D. Barker,et al.  Impact of Ground-based GPS PW and MM5-3DVar Background Error Statistics on Forecast of a Convective Case , 2005 .

[18]  Florence Rabier,et al.  Overview of global data assimilation developments in numerical weather‐prediction centres , 2005 .

[19]  Christopher K. Wikle,et al.  Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation, and Predictability , 2005, Technometrics.

[20]  Jordan G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2 , 2005 .

[21]  K. Mogensen,et al.  Representation of background error standard deviations in a limited area model data assimilation system , 2006 .

[22]  S. Sandeep,et al.  The impact of assimilation of AMSU data for the prediction of a tropical cyclone over India using a mesoscale model , 2006 .

[23]  J. Dudhia,et al.  A New Vertical Diffusion Package with an Explicit Treatment of Entrainment Processes , 2006 .

[24]  L. Berre,et al.  The Use of an Ensemble Approach to Study the Background Error Covariances in a Global NWP Model , 2006 .

[25]  L. Berre,et al.  The representation of the analysis effect in three error simulation techniques , 2006 .

[26]  Song‐You Hong,et al.  The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme (WSM6) , 2006 .

[27]  R. Treadon,et al.  A Two-Season Impact Study of Satellite and In Situ Data in the NCEP Global Data Assimilation System , 2007 .

[28]  W. Briggs Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[29]  P. K. Pal,et al.  Sensitivity of Mesoscale Model Forecast During a Satellite Launch to Different Cumulus Parameterization Schemes in MM5 , 2007 .

[30]  Chris Snyder,et al.  ENSEMBLE-BASED DATA ASSIMILATION , 2007 .

[31]  M. Gómez,et al.  A Hydrometeorological Modeling Study of a Flash-Flood Event over Catalonia, Spain , 2007 .

[32]  Fuqing Zhang,et al.  Impacts of initial condition errors on mesoscale predictability of heavy precipitation along the Mei‐Yu front of China , 2007 .

[33]  E. Richard,et al.  Impact of initial condition uncertainties on the predictability of heavy rainfall in the Mediterranean: a case study , 2008 .

[34]  Vinodkumar,et al.  The Impacts of Indirect Soil Moisture Assimilation and Direct Surface Temperature and Humidity Assimilation on a Mesoscale Model Simulation of an Indian Monsoon Depression , 2008 .

[35]  U. C. Mohanty,et al.  Analysis of the 26 July 2005 heavy rain event over Mumbai, India using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model , 2008 .

[36]  R. Bannister A review of forecast error covariance statistics in atmospheric variational data assimilation. II: Modelling the forecast error covariance statistics , 2008 .

[37]  Song Yang,et al.  Regional summer precipitation events in Asia and their changes in the past decades , 2008 .

[38]  Istvan Szunyogh,et al.  A local ensemble transform Kalman filter data assimilation system for the NCEP global model , 2008 .

[39]  P. K. Pal,et al.  Impact of TMI SST on the Simulation of a Heavy Rainfall Episode over Mumbai on 26 July 2005 , 2008 .

[40]  R. Ashrit,et al.  Skills of different mesoscale models over Indian region during monsoon season: Forecast errors , 2008 .

[41]  T. N. Krishnamurti,et al.  Improving Global Model Precipitation Forecasts over India Using Downscaling and the FSU Superensemble. Part II: Seasonal Climate , 2009 .

[42]  Christopher C. Hennon,et al.  The Operational Use of QuikSCAT Ocean Surface Vector Winds at the National Hurricane Center , 2009 .

[43]  T. N. Krishnamurti,et al.  Improving Global Model Precipitation Forecasts over India Using Downscaling and the FSU Superensemble. Part I: 1–5-Day Forecasts , 2009 .

[44]  M. Balmaseda,et al.  Ensemble estimation of background‐error variances in a three‐dimensional variational data assimilation system for the global ocean , 2009 .

[45]  P. K. Pal,et al.  Impacts of Satellite-Observed Winds and Total Precipitable Water on WRF Short-Range Forecasts over the Indian Region during the 2006 Summer Monsoon , 2009 .

[46]  P. K. Pal,et al.  Impact of variational assimilation of MODIS thermodynamic profiles in the simulation of western disturbance , 2009 .

[47]  D. Rao,et al.  Impact of horizontal resolution and the advantages of the nested domains approach in the prediction of tropical cyclone intensification and movement , 2009 .

[48]  D. Rowell,et al.  Impact of soil moisture initialisation and lateral boundary conditions on regional climate model simulations of the West African Monsoon , 2010 .

[49]  Y. Michel,et al.  Inhomogeneous Background Error Modeling and Estimation over Antarctica , 2010 .

[50]  P. C. Joshi,et al.  Impact of four dimensional assimilation of satellite data on long-range simulations over the Indian region during monsoon 2006 , 2010 .

[51]  J. Janowiak,et al.  An Evaluation of Precipitation Forecasts from Operational Models and Reanalyses Including Precipitation Variations Associated with MJO Activity , 2010 .

[52]  P. Goswami,et al.  Impact of background error statistics on 3D-Var assimilation: case study over the Indian region , 2011 .

[53]  P. K. Pal,et al.  Impact of satellite soundings on the simulation of heavy rainfall associated with tropical depressions , 2011 .

[54]  P. Goswami,et al.  Impact of background error statistics on forecasting of tropical cyclones over the north Indian Ocean , 2011 .

[55]  P. C. Joshi,et al.  Evaluation of Short-Range Forecasts from a Mesoscale Model Over the Indian Region During Monsoon 2006 , 2011 .

[56]  Alexandre Boilley,et al.  Assimilation of low-level wind in a high-resolution mesoscale model using the back and forth nudging algorithm , 2012 .

[57]  Real-time quantitative rainfall forecasts at hobli-level over Karnataka : evaluation for the winter monsoon 2010 , 2012 .

[58]  Huaqiang Liu,et al.  Effects of Different Land‐Surface Schemes on the Simulation of a Heavy Rainfall Event by WRF , 2012 .

[59]  S. Kashid,et al.  Impact of variational assimilation technique on simulation of a heavy rainfall event over Pune, India , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[60]  Ju-Hee Park,et al.  Impacts of boundary conditions on the precipitation simulation of RegCM4 in the CORDEX East Asia domain , 2013 .

[61]  J. M. Lewis,et al.  Data Assimilation as a Problem in Optimal Tracking: Application of Pontryagin’s Minimum Principle to Atmospheric Science , 2013 .

[62]  Xingang Fan,et al.  Assimilating QuikSCAT Ocean Surface Winds with the Weather Research and Forecasting Model for Surface Wind-Field Simulation over the Chukchi/Beaufort Seas , 2013, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[63]  Yuh-Lang Lin,et al.  Orographic effects on heavy rainfall events over northeastern Taiwan during the northeasterly monsoon season , 2013 .

[64]  Le Duc,et al.  Spatial-temporal fractions verification for high-resolution ensemble forecasts , 2013 .

[65]  Derek R. Stratman,et al.  Use of Multiple Verification Methods to Evaluate Forecasts of Convection from Hot- and Cold-Start Convection-Allowing Models , 2013 .

[66]  David D. Parrish,et al.  GSI 3DVar-Based Ensemble-Variational Hybrid Data Assimilation for NCEP Global Forecast System: Single-Resolution Experiments , 2013 .

[67]  S. Kar,et al.  Simulation of Monsoon Depressions Using WRF-VAR: Impact of Different Background Error Statistics and Lateral Boundary Conditions , 2014 .

[68]  S. Dorling,et al.  A climatology of convective available potential energy in Great Britain , 2014 .

[69]  P. K. Pal,et al.  Impact of various observing systems on weather analysis and forecast over the Indian region , 2014 .

[70]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Inhomogeneous Background Error Modeling for WRF-Var Using the NMC Method , 2014 .

[71]  A. Molini,et al.  Temperature and CAPE dependence of rainfall extremes in the eastern United States , 2014 .

[72]  Impact of surface observations on simulation of rainfall over NCR Delhi using regional background error statistics in WRF-3DVAR model , 2014, Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics.

[73]  L. M. Berliner,et al.  Assimilation of oceanographic observations with estimates of vertical background‐error covariances by a Bayesian hierarchical model , 2014 .

[74]  A. Sobel,et al.  Seamless precipitation prediction skill in the tropics and extratropics from a global model , 2014 .

[75]  T. Flesch,et al.  Verification of the WRF model for simulating heavy precipitation in Alberta , 2014 .

[76]  N. Keenlyside,et al.  Seasonal-to-decadal predictions with the ensemble Kalman filter and the Norwegian Earth System Model: a twin experiment , 2014 .

[77]  P. Goswami,et al.  Evaluation of high resolution rainfall forecasts over Karnataka for the 2011 southwest and northeast monsoon seasons , 2015 .

[78]  L. Berre,et al.  Comparison of static mesoscale background‐error covariances estimated by three different ensemble data assimilation techniques , 2015 .

[79]  L. Isaksen,et al.  The assimilation of horizontal line‐of‐sight wind information into the ECMWF data assimilation and forecasting system. Part I: The assessment of wind impact , 2015 .

[80]  A. Clark,et al.  Impact of Storm-Scale Lightning Data Assimilation on WRF-ARW Precipitation Forecasts during the 2013 Warm Season over the Contiguous United States , 2015 .

[81]  A. Mazzino,et al.  Numerical simulations of Mediterranean heavy precipitation events with the WRF model: A verification exercise using different approaches , 2015 .

[82]  P. Goswami,et al.  Impact of data assimilation on high‐resolution rainfall forecasts: A spatial, seasonal, and category analysis , 2015 .

[83]  Feimin Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Assimilating Conventional and ATOVS Data on Forecasted Near-Surface Wind with WRF-3DVAR , 2015 .

[84]  I. Hoteit,et al.  Predicting extreme rainfall events over Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: impact of data assimilation with conventional and satellite observations , 2016 .