Enhanced tES and tDCS computational models by meninges emulation

Objective: Understanding how current reaches the brain during transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) underpins efforts to rationalize outcomes and optimize interventions. To this end, computational models of current flow relate applied dose to brain electric field. Conventional tES modeling considers distinct tissues like scalp, skull, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), gray matter and white matter. The properties of highly conductive CSF are especially important. However, modeling the space between skull and brain as entirely CSF is not an accurate representation of anatomy. The space conventionally modeled as CSF is approximately half meninges (dura, arachnoid, and pia) with lower conductivity. However, the resolution required to describe individual meningeal layers is computationally restrictive in an MRI-derived head model. Emulating the effect of meninges through CSF conductivity modification could improve accuracy with minimal cost. Approach: Models with meningeal layers were developed in a concentric sphere head model. Then, in a model with only CSF between skull and brain, CSF conductivity was optimized to emulate the effect of meningeal layers on cortical electric field for multiple electrode positions. This emulated conductivity was applied to MRI-derived models. Main results: Compared to a model with conventional CSF conductivity (1.65 S/m), emulated CSF conductivity (0.85 S/m) produced voltage fields better correlated with intracranial recordings from epilepsy patients. Significance: Conventional tES mpodels have been validated using intracranial recording. Residual errors may nonetheless impact model utility. Because CSF is so conductive to current flow, misrepresentation of the skull-brain interface as entirely CSF is not realistic for tES modeling. Updating the conventional model with a CSF conductivity emulating the effect of the meninges enhances modeling accuracy without increasing model complexity. This allows existing modeling pipelines to be leveraged with a simple conductivity change. Using 0.85 S/m emulated CSF conductivity is recommended as the new standard in non-invasive brain stimulation modeling.

[1]  Yu Huang,et al.  The New York Head—A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting , 2015, NeuroImage.

[2]  Yu Huang,et al.  Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation—ROAST—a fully automated open-source pipeline , 2017, bioRxiv.

[4]  Peng Wen,et al.  The value and cost of complexity in predictive modelling: role of tissue anisotropic conductivity and fibre tracts in neuromodulation , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[6]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation , 2013, NeuroImage.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[8]  Julie M. Baker,et al.  Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient , 2011, Brain Stimulation.

[9]  S. Inao,et al.  Human dural thickness measured by ultrasonographic method: reflection of intracranial pressure. , 1997, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[10]  K. Felgenhauer Protein size and cerebrospinal fluid composition , 1974, Klinische Wochenschrift.

[11]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Clinician Accessible Tools for GUI Computational Models of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: BONSAI and SPHERES , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[12]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Validation of finite element model of transcranial electrical stimulation using scalp potentials: implications for clinical dose , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  Sven Bestmann,et al.  Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes , 2018, Brain Stimulation.

[14]  Marom Bikson,et al.  The Pursuit of DLPFC: Non-neuronavigated Methods to Target the Left Dorsolateral Pre-frontal Cortex With Symmetric Bicephalic Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[15]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: A basis for high-definition tDCS , 2013, NeuroImage.

[16]  Rosalind J. Sadleir,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[18]  B. Dubois,et al.  Direct current stimulation over the anterior temporal areas boosts semantic processing in primary progressive aphasia , 2016, Annals of neurology.

[19]  C. Merril,et al.  Ultrasensitive stain for proteins in polyacrylamide gels shows regional variation in cerebrospinal fluid proteins. , 1981, Science.

[20]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[21]  C Gabriel,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Guidelines for precise and accurate computational models of tDCS , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[23]  M. Bikson,et al.  Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[24]  C. Almli,et al.  Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood , 2009, NeuroImage.

[25]  K. Dziegielewska,et al.  BARRIER MECHANISMS IN THE BRAIN, I. ADULT BRAIN , 1999, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[26]  Katrina Wendel,et al.  The Influence of CSF on EEG Sensitivity Distributions of Multilayered Head Models , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[28]  Dana H. Brooks,et al.  A pipeline for the simulation of transcranial direct current stimulation for realistic human head models using SCIRun/BioMesh3D , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  Sarah H. Lisanby,et al.  Effect of Anatomical Variability on Electric Field Characteristics of Electroconvulsive Therapy and Magnetic Seizure Therapy: A Parametric Modeling Study , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[30]  L. Geddes,et al.  The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[31]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[32]  M. Bikson,et al.  Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: Role of “return” electrode’s position and size , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  Marc Fournier,et al.  Mapping the distance between the brain and the inner surface of the skull and their global asymmetries , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[34]  L. Parra,et al.  Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[35]  L. Parra,et al.  Inter-Individual Variation during Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Normalization of Dose Using MRI-Derived Computational Models , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[36]  Iman Ghodrati Toostani,et al.  Manipulation of Human Verticality Using High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2018, Front. Neurol..

[37]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: An optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[38]  P. V. van Rijen,et al.  Measurement of the Conductivity of Skull, Temporarily Removed During Epilepsy Surgery , 2004, Brain Topography.

[39]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Comparing and Validating Automated Tools for Individualized Electric Field Simulations in the Human Head , 2019, bioRxiv.

[40]  Lucas C Parra,et al.  The point spread function of the human head and its implications for transcranial current stimulation , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  Yu Huang,et al.  Targeted transcranial direct current stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke , 2013, NeuroImage.

[43]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[44]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Imaging artifacts induced by electrical stimulation during conventional fMRI of the brain , 2014, NeuroImage.

[45]  Zhi-De Deng,et al.  Electric field strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy: a finite element simulation study , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[46]  Yu Huang,et al.  Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation—ROAST—a fully automated open-source pipeline , 2019, Journal of neural engineering.

[47]  W. Sutherling,et al.  Conductivities of Three-Layer Live Human Skull , 2004, Brain Topography.

[48]  Alessia Paglialonga,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Estimation of the Electric Field and of the Current Density in an Anatomical Human Head Model , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  David R. Wozny,et al.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[50]  A. Sadegh,et al.  Histology and Morphology of the Brain Subarachnoid Trabeculae , 2015, Anatomy research international.

[51]  J. Jefferys,et al.  Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[52]  M. Bikson,et al.  Computational modeling of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in obesity: Impact of head fat and dose guidelines☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[53]  Kay Jann,et al.  In-vivo Imaging of Magnetic Fields Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Human Brain using MRI , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[54]  Valery V Tuchin,et al.  Glucose and mannitol diffusion in human dura mater. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[55]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Automatic M1‐SO Montage Headgear for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (TDCS) Suitable for Home and High‐Throughput In‐Clinic Applications , 2019, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[56]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[57]  Tae-Seong Kim,et al.  Influence of anisotropic conductivity in the skull and white matter on transcranial direct current stimulation via an anatomically realistic finite element head model , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[58]  Chang-Hwan Im,et al.  COMETS: A MATLAB toolbox for simulating local electric fields generated by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2013, Biomedical Engineering Letters.

[59]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[60]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  tDCS‐Induced Analgesia and Electrical Fields in Pain‐Related Neural Networks in Chronic Migraine , 2012, Headache.

[61]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2011, NeuroImage.