Revisiting hydrophobic mismatch with free energy simulation studies of transmembrane helix tilt and rotation.

Protein-lipid interaction and bilayer regulation of membrane protein functions are largely controlled by the hydrophobic match between the transmembrane (TM) domain of membrane proteins and the surrounding lipid bilayer. To systematically characterize responses of a TM helix and lipid adaptations to a hydrophobic mismatch, we have performed a total of 5.8-mus umbrella sampling simulations and calculated the potentials of mean force (PMFs) as a function of TM helix tilt angle under various mismatch conditions. Single-pass TM peptides called WALPn (n = 16, 19, 23, and 27) were used in two lipid bilayers with different hydrophobic thicknesses to consider hydrophobic mismatch caused by either the TM length or the bilayer thickness. In addition, different flanking residues, such as alanine, lysine, and arginine, instead of tryptophan in WALP23 were used to examine their influence. The PMFs, their decomposition, and trajectory analysis demonstrate that 1), tilting of a single-pass TM helix is the major response to a hydrophobic mismatch; 2), TM helix tilting up to approximately 10 degrees is inherent due to the intrinsic entropic contribution arising from helix precession around the membrane normal even under a negative mismatch; 3), the favorable helix-lipid interaction provides additional driving forces for TM helix tilting under a positive mismatch; 4), the minimum-PMF tilt angle is generally located where there is the hydrophobic match and little lipid perturbation; 5), TM helix rotation is dependent on the specific helix-lipid interaction; and 6), anchoring residues at the hydrophilic/hydrophobic interface can be an important determinant of TM helix orientation.

[1]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  J. Killian,et al.  Peptides in lipid bilayers: the power of simple models. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[3]  Wonpil Im,et al.  Implementation and application of helix–helix distance and crossing angle restraint potentials , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  R. Larson,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of model trans-membrane peptides in lipid bilayers: a systematic investigation of hydrophobic mismatch. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[5]  M. Bloom,et al.  Combined influence of cholesterol and synthetic amphiphillic peptides upon bilayer thickness in model membranes. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[6]  J. Salgado,et al.  The dynamic orientation of membrane-bound peptides: bridging simulations and experiments. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[7]  J. Killian,et al.  On the orientation of a designed transmembrane peptide: toward the right tilt angle? , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  S. Opella,et al.  Tilt angle of a trans-membrane helix is determined by hydrophobic mismatch. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  J. Killian,et al.  The effects of hydrophobic mismatch between phosphatidylcholine bilayers and transmembrane alpha-helical peptides depend on the nature of interfacially exposed aromatic and charged residues. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[11]  J. Nagle,et al.  Structure of lipid bilayers. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[12]  Stephen H. White,et al.  Experimentally determined hydrophobicity scale for proteins at membrane interfaces , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[13]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[14]  C. Brooks,et al.  Interfacial folding and membrane insertion of designed peptides studied by molecular dynamics simulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Taehoon Kim,et al.  Novel free energy calculations to explore mechanisms and energetics of membrane protein structure and function , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  Taehoon Kim,et al.  CHARMM‐GUI: A web‐based graphical user interface for CHARMM , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[17]  G. Torrie,et al.  Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling , 1977 .

[18]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[19]  W. Im,et al.  Automated Builder and Database of Protein/Membrane Complexes for Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2007, PloS one.

[20]  A. Johannsson,et al.  The effect of bilayer thickness on the activity of (Na+ + K+)-ATPase. , 1981, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[21]  Erik Strandberg,et al.  Geometry and Intrinsic Tilt of a Tryptophan-Anchored Transmembrane α-Helix Determined by 2H NMR , 2002 .

[22]  J. Killian,et al.  Hydrophobic matching mechanism investigated by molecular dynamics simulations , 2002 .

[23]  S. Munro,et al.  Sorting of membrane proteins in the secretory pathway , 1993, Cell.

[24]  J. Killian,et al.  Hydrophobic mismatch between helices and lipid bilayers. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[25]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[26]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[27]  Erik Strandberg,et al.  Snorkeling of lysine side chains in transmembrane helices: how easy can it get? , 2003, FEBS letters.

[28]  J. Killian,et al.  Protein–lipid interactions studied with designed transmembrane peptides: role of hydrophobic matching and interfacial anchoring (Review) , 2003, Molecular membrane biology.

[29]  A T Brünger,et al.  Are there dominant membrane protein families with a given number of helices? , 1997, Proteins.

[30]  A. Kusumi,et al.  Effects of phospholipid unsaturation on the bilayer nonpolar region: a molecular simulation study. , 2004, Journal of lipid research.

[31]  J. Killian,et al.  Hydrophobic mismatch between proteins and lipids in membranes. , 1998, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[32]  W. Im,et al.  Restraint potential and free energy decomposition formalism for helical tilting , 2007 .

[33]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  An ab initio study on the torsional surface of alkanes and its effect on molecular simulations of alkanes and a DPPC bilayer. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[34]  M. Waters,et al.  New Insights into Growth Hormone Receptor Function and Clinical Implications , 2008, Hormone Research in Paediatrics.

[35]  Jeffery B. Klauda,et al.  CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder for mixed bilayers and its application to yeast membranes. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[36]  J. Killian,et al.  Influence of flanking residues on tilt and rotation angles of transmembrane peptides in lipid bilayers. A solid-state 2H NMR study. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[37]  B. Brooks,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method , 1995 .

[38]  A. Holt,et al.  Tilt and rotation angles of a transmembrane model peptide as studied by fluorescence spectroscopy. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[39]  W. Im,et al.  Transmembrane helix tilting: insights from calculating the potential of mean force. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[40]  J. East,et al.  Effects of lipid fatty acyl chain structure on the activity of the (Ca2+ + Mg2+)-ATPase. , 1986, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[41]  Olaf S Andersen,et al.  Bilayer thickness and membrane protein function: an energetic perspective. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[42]  Erik Strandberg,et al.  Tilt angles of transmembrane model peptides in oriented and non-oriented lipid bilayers as determined by 2H solid-state NMR. , 2004, Biophysical journal.