Friends With Performance Benefits: A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Friendship and Group Performance

The current article examines if, and under which conditions, there exists a positive relationship between working with friends and group performance. To do so, using data from 1,016 groups obtained from 26 studies, we meta-analyzed comparisons of the performance of friendship groups versus acquaintance groups. Results show that friendship has a significant positive effect on group task performance (Cohen’s d = 0.31). Furthermore, this relationship was moderated by group size (i.e., the positive effect of friendship on performance increased with group size) and task focus (i.e., friendship groups performed better than acquaintance groups on tasks requiring a high quantity of output, whereas there was no performance benefit on tasks requiring a single or high-quality output). These results help to reconcile mixed findings and illustrate when friendship groups are more likely to perform better than acquaintance groups.

[1]  Caryl E. Rusbult,et al.  Commitment to Dating Relationships and Cross-Sex Friendships in America and China , 1995 .

[2]  A. Aron,et al.  Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results , 2016 .

[4]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Group dynamics, 3rd ed. , 1968 .

[5]  M. Hogg,et al.  Friendship and group identification: a new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink , 1998 .

[6]  C. Nemeth Differential contributions of majority and minority influence , 1986 .

[7]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Reactions of preschool children to an adult stranger: A behavioral systems approach. , 1982 .

[8]  Lauren S. Simon,et al.  A Head Start or a Step Behind? Understanding How Dispositional and Motivational Resources Influence Emotional Exhaustion , 2016 .

[9]  Janice R. Kelly,et al.  Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. , 1985 .

[10]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  Social Support and the Perception of Geographical Slant. , 2008, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[11]  Simon T. Tidd,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF ROLE AMBIGUITY AND TRUST IN CONFLICT PERCEPTION: UNPACKING THE TASK CONFLICT TO RELATIONSHIP CONFLICT LINKAGE , 2004 .

[12]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Positive Feelings in Friendship: Does Imbalance in the Relationship Matter? , 2003 .

[13]  L. Birch,et al.  Preschool Children's Food Sharing with Friends and Acquaintances. , 1986 .

[14]  J. Hackman,et al.  Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues , 1995 .

[15]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance , 2003, Psychological science.

[16]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action , 1992 .

[17]  J. Vevea,et al.  Maximum-likelihood methods for meta-analysis: A tutorial using R , 2015 .

[18]  James C. King,et al.  Group Problem-Solving , 1988, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[19]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[20]  Melinda J. Montgomery,et al.  The Quality of Friendships at Work and Job Satisfaction , 1995 .

[21]  Winfred Arthur,et al.  Development of a new outlier statistic for meta-analytic data , 1995 .

[22]  E. Morrison,et al.  NEWCOMERS' RELATIONSHIPS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORK TIES DURING SOCIALIZATION , 2002 .

[23]  G. Walton,et al.  Cues of working together fuel intrinsic motivation , 2014 .

[24]  Steffanie L. Wilk,et al.  Working Harder or Hardly Working? Posting Performance Eliminates Social Loafing and Promotes Social Laboring in Workgroups , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[25]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[26]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Recall suffers from collaboration: joint recall effects of friendship and task complexity , 1995 .

[27]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[28]  Roger Nibler,et al.  The Effects of Culture and Cohesiveness on Intragroup Conflict and Effectiveness , 2003, The Journal of social psychology.

[29]  J. Dunn Children's Friendships: The Beginnings of Intimacy , 2004 .

[30]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[31]  H. Klein,et al.  Two Investigations of the Relationships among Group Goals, Goal Commitment, Cohesion, and Performance , 1995 .

[32]  D. Fessler,et al.  Friends Shrink Foes , 2013, Psychological science.

[33]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[34]  Jr. James R. Larson In Search of Synergy in Small Group Performance , 2009 .

[35]  M. Azmitia,et al.  Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning , 1993 .

[36]  R. Sabatelli The Social Psychology of Groups , 2000 .

[37]  J. Enns,et al.  What’s in a Friendship? Partner Visibility Supports Cognitive Collaboration between Friends , 2015, PloS one.

[38]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective , 1983 .

[39]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  R. Moreland Are Dyads Really Groups? , 2010 .

[41]  Katherine W. Phillips,et al.  Social Category Diversity Promotes Premeeting Elaboration: The Role of Relationship Focus , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[42]  William G. Austin Friendship and Fairness , 1980 .

[43]  Jonathan P. West,et al.  Workplace Relations: Friendship Patterns and Consequences (According to Managers) , 2002 .

[44]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Cued Memory Collaboration: Effects of Friendship and Type of Retrieval Cue , 1997 .

[45]  Timothy A. Judge,et al.  Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects ☆ , 2006 .

[46]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[47]  Stephen J. Zaccaro,et al.  Cohesiveness and Performance on an Additive Task: Evidence for Multidimensionality. , 1988 .

[48]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[49]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Dyads Can Be Groups (and Often Are) , 2010 .

[50]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Effects of group size, problem difficulty, and sex on group performance and member reactions. , 1978 .

[51]  S. Wheelan,et al.  Group Size, Group Development, and Group Productivity , 2009 .

[52]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models. , 2009 .

[53]  N. Gillespie,et al.  Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. , 2016, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  R. Bond,et al.  Group Size and Conformity , 2005 .

[55]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[56]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Social Loafing: a Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[57]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis , 2009 .

[58]  C. Begg,et al.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. , 1994, Biometrics.

[59]  H. Ross,et al.  Defining and studying reciprocity in young children. , 1988 .

[60]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Do friends perform better than acquaintances? the interaction of friendship, conflict, and task , 1993 .

[61]  J. Andersson,et al.  Net effect of memory collaboration: how is collaboration affected by factors such as friendship, gender and age? , 2001, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[62]  Steven Pinker,et al.  The psychology of coordination and common knowledge. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[63]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  Are most published social psychological findings false , 2016 .

[64]  M. Deutsch The Resolution of ConflictConstructive and Destructive Processes , 1974 .

[65]  G. Ladd Having friends, keeping friends, making friends, and being liked by peers in the classroom: predictors of children's early school adjustment? , 1990, Child development.

[66]  S. Asch Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .

[67]  Amy Voida,et al.  Shared identity helps partially distributed teams, but distance still matters , 2010, GROUP.

[68]  Müjde Peker,et al.  The Role of Familiarity Among Group Members in Collaborative Inhibition and Social Contagion , 2009 .

[69]  Paul B Freeman,et al.  With a little help from my friends , 2013, 2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE).

[70]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. , 1997 .

[71]  Dorothy Miell,et al.  Children’s Creative Collaborations: The Importance of Friendship when Working Together on a Musical Composition , 2000 .

[72]  W. Hartup,et al.  Friendships and adaptation in the life course. , 1997 .

[73]  V. Vroom Work and motivation , 1964 .

[74]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances , 2002 .

[75]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[76]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[77]  S Duval,et al.  Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.

[78]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  “… with a little help from my friends”: friendship, effort norms, and group motivation gain , 2011 .

[79]  C. R. Evans,et al.  Group Cohesion and Performance , 1991 .

[80]  N. Kerr Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis , 1983 .

[81]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarowitz,et al.  Do Friends Share and Communicate More Than Non-Friends? , 1981 .

[82]  J. McCormick,et al.  Relationships between Self-Processes and Group Processes with Friends and Acquaintances. , 2008 .

[83]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Interpersonal trust within negotiations: : Meta-analytic evidence, critical contingencies, and directions for future research. , 2014 .

[84]  A. Bandura,et al.  Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[85]  T. J. Berndt,et al.  Friends' influence of adolescents' adjustment to school. , 1991, Child development.

[86]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. , 1997 .

[87]  A. Ingham,et al.  The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance , 1974 .

[88]  L. Hedges Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect size and Related Estimators , 1981 .

[89]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[90]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  The Social Fabric of a Team-Based M.B.A. Program: Network Effects on Student Satisfaction and Performance , 1997 .

[91]  Rodger W. Griffeth,et al.  The opportunity for friendship in the workplace: An underexplored construct , 1995 .

[92]  Jixia Yang,et al.  Decoupling task and relationship conflict: the role of intragroup emotional processing , 2004 .

[93]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[94]  Kristin Behfar,et al.  The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study , 2003 .

[95]  J. Hackman,et al.  Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions , 1970 .

[96]  A. Tesser,et al.  Some affective consequences of social comparison and reflection processes: the pain and pleasure of being close. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[97]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Collaboration and Memory: Effects of Dyadic Retrieval on Different Memory Tasks , 1996 .

[98]  M. Brewer,et al.  Motivated Entitativity: Applying Balance Theory to Group Perception , 2006 .

[99]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[100]  Lorraine Hope,et al.  "With a little help from my friends...": the role of co-witness relationship in susceptibility to misinformation. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[101]  J. McGrath,et al.  TIME MATTERS IN TEAM PERFORMANCE: EFFECTS OF MEMBER FAMILIARITY, ENTRAINMENT, AND TASK DISCONTINUITY ON SPEED AND QUALITY , 2003 .

[102]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[103]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[104]  Amy Voida,et al.  Cross-cutting faultlines of location and shared identity in the intergroup cooperation of partially distributed groups , 2012, CHI.

[105]  S. Zaccaro,et al.  The Effects of Task and Interpersonal Cohesiveness on Performance of a Disjunctive Group Task1 , 1988 .

[106]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[107]  J. Strough,et al.  Adolescents' collaboration in the classroom: Do peer relationships or gender matter?† , 2008 .

[108]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[109]  Alison Kington,et al.  Children's friendships and learning in school: cognitive enhancement through social interaction? , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[110]  J. Perry-Smith Social network ties beyond nonredundancy: an experimental investigation of the effect of knowledge content and tie strength on creativity. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[111]  M. Clark,et al.  Children's Acquisition of Appropriate Norms for Friendships and Acquaintances , 1994 .

[112]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[113]  N. Ellemers,et al.  MOTIVATING INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS AT WORK : A SOCIAL IDENTITY PERSPECTIVE ON LEADERSHIP AND GROUP PERFORMANCE , 2004 .

[114]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[115]  Patrick A. Tissington,et al.  Group membership salience and task performance , 2009 .

[116]  E. Ramsden Group Process and Productivity , 1973 .

[117]  M. Clark,et al.  Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. , 1979 .

[118]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .