E DITOR ’ S C OMMENTS Diversity of Design Science Research

Design in the sciences of the artificial is concerned with what might be, with " changing existing situations into preferred ones " (Simon 1996, p. 130). As a multifaceted concept, design has been studied by IS scholars as an object, process, and capability. As a multidisciplinary concept, it has received significant attention across various traditions of research in the IS community. As a multilevel concept, it has been examined to uncover interdependencies across levels of analysis. As a concept that can redefine human experiences, it has led to the development of problem solving and innovation practices that embody design thinking (Buchanan 2015). We have seen significant discussion in the IS literature about the design science paradigm, which is concerned with developing and evaluating new and innovative IT artifacts to solve problems and through the process contribute to knowledge (Hevner et al. 2004). The discussion has been wide-ranging and has encompassed the distinctive characteristics of design science research, the knowledge contributions of design science research, and how design science research can be conducted and presented effectively and evaluated appropriately (e. A look at papers published in MIS Quarterly and other major IS journals reveals important commonalities in the practice of design science research but also reveals important differences. There are observable genres of design science, which differ with respect to the problems that are addressed, the types of artifacts that are designed and evaluated, the search processes that are used to create and refine the IT artifacts to solve problems, and the types of knowledge contributions that are made. For example, consider the types of problems that are addressed and the artifacts that are developed across a few genres: the computational genre is concerned with solving business and societal problems by developing computational models and algorithms, the optimization genre is concerned with solving operational and decisional problems by developing optimization and related models and heu-MIS Quarterly Vol. 41 No. 1 pp. iii-xviii/March 2017 iii

[1]  Peter J. Brews,et al.  Learning to plan and planning to learn: resolving the planning school/learning school debate , 1999 .

[2]  T. S. Raghu,et al.  Interdependencies in IT Infrastructure Services: Analyzing Service Processes for Optimal Incentive Design , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research , 2008 .

[4]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Healthcare Predictive Analytics for Risk Profiling in Chronic Care: A Bayesian Multitask Learning Approach , 2017, MIS Q..

[5]  H. Smalley The systems approach. , 1972, Hospitals.

[6]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Management of Information Systems Outsourcing: A Bidding Perspective , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Yair Wand,et al.  Using Cognitive Principles to Guide Classification in Information Systems Modeling , 2008, MIS Q..

[8]  Andrew Burton-Jones,et al.  How Can We Develop Contextualized Theories of Effective Use? A Demonstration in the Context of Community-Care Electronic Health Records , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[10]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[11]  Yair Wand,et al.  Guidelines for Designing Visual Ontologies to Support Knowledge Identification , 2011, MIS Q..

[12]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  Patient Data as Medical Facts: Social Media Practices as a Foundation for Medical Knowledge Creation , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[14]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[15]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing , 2010, MIS Q..

[16]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[17]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[18]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Detecting Fake Websites: The Contribution of Statistical Learning Theory , 2010, MIS Q..

[19]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Improving Analysis Pattern Reuse in Conceptual Design: Augmenting Automated Processes with Supervised Learning , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[21]  M. Kyng,et al.  Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge , 1987 .

[22]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  A Program for Research on Management Information Systems , 1973 .

[23]  Sumit Sarkar,et al.  Recommendations Using Information from Multiple Association Rules: A Probabilistic Approach , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Sudha Ram,et al.  Modeling Spatial and Temporal Set-Based Constraints During Conceptual Database Design , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Do Ontological Deficiencies in Modeling Grammars Matter? , 2011, MIS Q..

[26]  Nicholas Dew,et al.  What to Do Next? The Case for Non-Predictive Strategy , 2006 .

[27]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Integrating User Preferences and Real-Time Workload in Information Services , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  When is the Right Time to Refresh Knowledge Discovered From Data? , 2013, Oper. Res..

[29]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the Ontological Quality and Logical Quality of Conceptual-Modeling Grammars: The Need for a Dual Perspective , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Axel Legay,et al.  From Programs to Systems. The Systems perspective in Computing , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[31]  Irit Hadar,et al.  Variations in Conceptual Modeling: Classification and Ontological Analysis , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Richard Buchanan Worlds in the Making: Design, Management, and the Reform of Organizational Culture , 2015 .

[33]  Sumit Sarkar,et al.  Privacy and Big Data: Scalable Approaches to Sanitize Large Transactional Databases for Sharing , 2016, MIS Q..

[34]  James R Cook Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2014 .

[35]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  A Fitness-Utility Model for Design Science Research , 2011, TMIS.

[36]  Alok Gupta,et al.  Replicating Online Yankee Auctions to Analyze Auctioneers' and Bidders' Strategies , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Roman Lukyanenko,et al.  The IQ of the Crowd: Understanding and Improving Information Quality in Structured User-Generated Content , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Milind Dawande,et al.  Structural Search and Optimization in Social Networks , 2012, INFORMS J. Comput..

[39]  Shawn P. Curley,et al.  Impact of Information Feedback in Continuous Combinatorial Auctions: An Experimental Study of Economic Performance , 2013, MIS Q..

[40]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue - Flexible and Distributed Information Systems Development: State of the Art and Research Challenges , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[42]  R. Stamper Information in business and administrative systems , 1973 .

[43]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Multi-contextuality in ubiquitous computing: Investigating the car case through action research , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[44]  John Leslie King,et al.  A Representational Scheme for Analyzing Information Technology and Organizational Dependency , 2002, MIS Q..

[45]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Control of Flexible Software Development Under Uncertainty , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  CyberGate: A Design Framework and System for Text Analysis of Computer-Mediated Communication , 2008, MIS Q..

[47]  J. Urry,et al.  Enacting the social , 2004 .

[48]  Pär J. Ågerfalk Getting pragmatic , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[50]  Telecommunications Board Assessing the Impacts of Changes in the Information Technology R&D Ecosystem: Retaining Leadership in an Increasingly Global Environment , 2009 .

[51]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  The Process and Product of System Design , 1978 .

[52]  Gerard H. Gaynor,et al.  Managing by design , 2016, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[53]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[54]  Wolfgang Ketter,et al.  A Multiagent Competitive Gaming Platform to Address Societal Challenges , 2016, MIS Q..