An investigation of changes in attitude over time of GDSS groups under unanimity and majority decision rules

Abstract Under controlled laboratory conditions, we examine the effects of variations in decision rules on attitudes of individuals operating within groups. We find that significant changes in satisfaction and commitment occur across sessions when groups operate under a unanimity decision rule, but not when groups operate under a majority decision rule. We also observe that these two DRs produce opposing results both when there is membership continuity and when there is membership change.

[1]  M. Horton,et al.  Coordination challenges in a computer-supported meeting environment , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Using Two Different Electronic Meeting System Tools for the Same Task: An Experimental Comparison , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[4]  L. Thompson,et al.  Group negotiation: Effects of decision rule, agenda, and aspiration. , 1988 .

[5]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Group Decision Support Systems on Group Development , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Auction Market , 1982 .

[7]  James R. Marsden,et al.  An Empirical Investigation Into the Relation Between Performance and Perception of Users With a What-If Facility , 1997, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[8]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Evolution of group performance over time: A repeated measures study of GDSS effects , 1993 .

[9]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Applying Adaptive Structuration Theory to Investigate the Process of Group Support Systems Use , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[11]  William N. Dilla,et al.  Judgment Accuracy and Outcomes in Negotiation: A Causal Modeling Analysis of Decision-Aiding Effects , 1995 .

[12]  Robert L. Crosslin,et al.  Group decision support systems: Factors in a software implementation , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[13]  W. Doll,et al.  A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement , 1989 .

[14]  R. Gallupe,et al.  Suppressing the contribution of the group's best member: is GDSS use appropriate for all group tasks? , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  C. H. Castore,et al.  Determinants of support for group decisions , 1978 .

[16]  Matthew L. Spitzer,et al.  Experimental Law and Economics: An Introduction , 1985 .

[17]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. , 1985 .

[18]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[19]  Kieran Mathieson Reducing bias in user's evaluations of information systems , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Robert J. McQueen,et al.  An Action Research Study of Effects of Asynchronous Groupware Support on Productivity and Outcome Quality in Process Redesign Groups , 1998, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[21]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  Introduction: The JEMCO Workshop-Description of a Longitudinal Study , 1993 .

[22]  Charles E. Miller,et al.  Group Discussion and Judgment , 1983 .

[23]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  An assessment of electronic meeting systems in a corporate setting , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[24]  James R. Marsden,et al.  End user - IS design professional interaction - information exchange for firm profit or end user satisfaction? , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[25]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[26]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  The Effects of Variations in Capabilities of GDSS Designs on Management of Cognitive Conflict in Groups , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  Papers in experimental economics , 1991 .

[28]  V. Milutinovic,et al.  Proceedings of the 23rd annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1990 .

[29]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Comparison of Laboratory and Field Research in the Study of Electronic Meeting Systems , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Poppy Lauretta McLeod,et al.  An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  Adoption Patterns and Attitudinal Development in Computer-Supported Meetings: An Exploratory Study with SAMM , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  C. Parks,et al.  Group Discussion as Affected by Number of Alternatives and by a Time Limit , 1995 .

[33]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[34]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Experience at IBM with group support systems: A field study , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  James R. Marsden,et al.  A multisession comparative study of group size and group performance in an electronic meeting system environment , 1999, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[36]  N. Pennington,et al.  Inside the Jury. , 1985 .

[37]  Hsin-Ginn Hwang,et al.  The effect of group size on group performance in computer-supported decision making , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[38]  Brad M. Jackson,et al.  Interpretive analysis of team use of group technologies , 1993 .

[39]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  A longitudinal experiment on relational tone in computer-mediated and face to face interaction , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[40]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  W. Gerke,et al.  The impact of the order book privilege on traders' behavior and the market process : An experimental study , 2000 .

[42]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. , 1976 .

[43]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Negotiation in Small Groups , 1989 .

[44]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[45]  R. Ashton,et al.  Students As Surrogates In Behavioral Accounting Research - Some Evidence , 1980 .

[46]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Groupware: some issues and experiences , 1991, CACM.

[47]  Roger K. Mosvick,et al.  We'Ve Got to Start Meeting Like This!: A Guide to Successful Business Meeting Management , 1986 .

[48]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Consensus and Perceived Satisfaction Levels: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of GSS and Non-GSS Outcomes within and between the United States and Mexico , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Advances in behavioral economics , 2004 .

[50]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  The Impact of Group Support Systems on Group Conflict and Conflict Management , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Basic group processes , 1983 .

[52]  Otto Petrovic,et al.  Traditionally-moderated versus computer supported brainstorming: a comparative study , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[53]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic Meeting Support: The GroupSystems Concept , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[54]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[55]  V. Smith Papers in experimental economics , 1991 .

[56]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Membership Matters , 1993 .

[57]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[58]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[59]  B. E. Wynne,et al.  An experiment assessing group support system and facilitator effects on meeting outcomes , 1995 .

[60]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[61]  N. Archer A comparison of computer conferences with face-to-face meetings for small group business decisions , 1990 .

[62]  Benjamin J. Broome,et al.  Guidelines For Computer-Assisted Group Problem Solving , 1992 .

[63]  G. Homans The human group , 1952 .

[64]  N. P. Vitalari,et al.  The need of longitudinal designs in the study of computing environments , 1986, Trends in Information Systems.

[65]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Research methods in information systems , 1985 .

[66]  James R. Marsden,et al.  A methodology and operationalization for acquiring knowledge from multiple experts , 1995 .