The Effect of Instruction on Conventional Expressions in L2 Pragmatics.

Abstract This study investigates the effects of instruction (input plus focused metapragmatic noticing) on the oral production of conventional expressions, particularly those conventional expressions which perform specific pragmatic functions in English. Using a pre-test–instruction–post-test design we tested 36 university-level students in six intact intensive English classes in order to determine whether guided metapragmatic noticing activities help learners increase oral production of targeted conventional expressions and whether such gains (if they are realized) can be generalized to other conventional expressions. Students were divided into two groups of three classes each; the two groups received instruction on a different set of expressions. Results showed that both instructional groups showed significant gains on one set of conventional expressions but not another, suggesting that learning conventional expressions is sensitive to instruction but also constrained by the transparency of the expression and the learners’ level of linguistic development.

[1]  I. Kecskés.  Conceptual fluency and the use of situation-bound utterances in L2 , 2000 .

[2]  Martha A. Jones,et al.  Facilitating the acquisition of formulaic sequences: An exploratory study in an EAP context , 2004 .

[3]  J. Kess.  Conversational routine: explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech: Florian Coulmas, ed., Rasmus Rask Studies in Pragmatic Linguistics, Vol. 2. Janua Linguarunt Series Maior 96. The Hague: Mouton, 1981. xii + 311 pp. DM 92.00 (cloth) , 1983 .

[4]  Heidi E. Vellenga.  Instructional effectiveness and interlanguage pragmatics , 2008 .

[5]  Carlos A. Yorio,et al.  Bilingualism Across the Lifespan: Idiomaticity as an indicator of second language proficiency , 1989 .

[6]  Kenneth R. Rose,et al.  On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics , 2005 .

[7]  Sarah Gorham.  I'm So Sorry , 2005 .

[8]  Noel R. Houck.  Pragmatics: Teaching Natural Conversation , 2011 .

[9]  Roger W. Andersen,et al.  THE ONE TO ONE PRINCIPLE OF INTERLANGUAGE CONSTRUCTION , 1984 .

[10]  Paulo Quaglio,et al.  Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. natural conversation , 2009 .

[11]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  M. Eisenstein,et al.  ‘I Very Appreciate’: Expressions of Gratitude by Native and Non-native Speakers of American English , 1986 .

[13]  K. Bardovi-Harlig.  Conventional Expressions as a Pragmalinguistic Resource: Recognition and Production of Conventional Expressions in L2 Pragmatics , 2009 .

[14]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  The Learning of Complex Speech Act Behaviour , 1990 .

[15]  J. House.  Developing Pragmatic Fluency in English as a Foreign Language: Routines and Metapragmatic Awareness , 1996, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[16]  Penelope Brown.  [Review of the book Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech ed. by Florian Coulmas] , 1983 .

[17]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[18]  Z. Dörnyei,et al.  Knowledge and acquisition of formulaic sequences: A longitudinal study , 2004 .

[19]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Effect Size Substantive Interpretation Guidelines : Issues in the Interpretation of Effect Sizes , 2007 .