DNA methylation-based forensic tissue identification.

Identifying the source tissue of biological material found at crime scenes can be very informative in a number of cases. Despite their usefulness, current visual, catalytic, enzymatic, and immunologic tests for presumptive and confirmatory tissue identification are applicable only to a subset of samples, might suffer limitations such as low specificity, lack of sensitivity, and are substantially impacted by environmental insults. Moreover these assays are incompatible and thus cannot be multiplexed. Thus they are less amenable to automation. In addition their results are operator-dependent. A better alternative approach is tissue identification based on messenger RNA (mRNA) or microRNA (miRNA); however, RNA is not as stable as DNA, and requires the use of non-standard procedures by forensic laboratories. Herein a DNA-based assay is described that enables tissue identification based on detection of tissue-specific methylation patterns. DNA samples are subjected to digestion by a methylation-sensitive restriction endonuclease followed by multiplex amplification of specific genomic targets with fluorescent-labeled primers, capillary electrophoresis of amplification products, and automatic signal analysis by dedicated software, yielding the source tissue of the sample. The single tube assay was designed for easy integration by forensic laboratories (as the assay utilizes the same platforms as current forensic STR profiling). The system is fully automatable, provides operator-independent results, and allows combining tissue identification with profiling in a single procedure. The assay was tested on 50 DNA samples from blood, saliva, semen, and skin epidermis, and the source tissue was successfully identified in all cases. Detection of semen and DNA profiling were combined into one assay and the ability to detect mixtures of semen and saliva in various ratios was demonstrated. The assay correctly detected semen in all samples where it was present, and the calculated percentage of semen was comparable to the fraction of semen in the samples. The results demonstrate that methylation-based tissue identification is more than a proof-of-concept. The methodology holds promise as another viable forensic DNA analysis tool for characterization of biological materials.

[1]  K De Wael,et al.  In search of blood--detection of minute particles using spectroscopic methods. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[2]  Dan Frumkin,et al.  Authentication of forensic DNA samples. , 2010, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[3]  Manfred Kayser,et al.  MicroRNA markers for forensic body fluid identification obtained from microarray screening and quantitative RT-PCR confirmation , 2010, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[4]  J. Ballantyne,et al.  Recovery and Stability of RNA in Vaginal Swabs and Blood, Semen, and Saliva Stains , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  Kelly Virkler,et al.  Analysis of body fluids for forensic purposes: from laboratory testing to non-destructive rapid confirmatory identification at a crime scene. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[6]  M. Kayser,et al.  Stable RNA markers for identification of blood and saliva stains revealed from whole genome expression analysis of time-wise degraded samples , 2007, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[7]  W Bär,et al.  mRNA profiling for body fluid identification by reverse transcription endpoint PCR and realtime PCR. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[8]  Jack Ballantyne,et al.  mRNA Profiling for Body Fluid Identification by Multiplex Quantitative RT‐PCR * , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  A. Bird DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. , 2002, Genes & development.

[10]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[11]  SallyAnn Harbison,et al.  The development of a mRNA multiplex RT-PCR assay for the definitive identification of body fluids. , 2010, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[12]  Peter A. Jones,et al.  DNA methylation: The nuts and bolts of repression , 2007, Journal of cellular physiology.

[13]  J. Ballantyne,et al.  Messenger RNA profiling: a prototype method to supplant conventional methods for body fluid identification. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[14]  Jack Ballantyne,et al.  Multiplex mRNA profiling for the identification of body fluids. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[15]  Li Zhang,et al.  Genome-Wide Profiling of DNA Methylation Reveals a Class of Normally Methylated CpG Island Promoters , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[16]  Israel Steinfeld,et al.  Developmental programming of CpG island methylation profiles in the human genome , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[17]  Igor K Lednev,et al.  Raman spectroscopy offers great potential for the nondestructive confirmatory identification of body fluids. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[18]  N Kollias,et al.  A rapid method to detect dried saliva stains swabbed from human skin using fluorescence spectroscopy. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[19]  T. Hashimshony,et al.  The role of DNA methylation in setting up chromatin structure during development , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[20]  B. Budowle,et al.  Extracting evidence from forensic DNA analyses: future molecular biology directions. , 2009, BioTechniques.