Hydrogel Meniscal Replacement in the Sheep Knee

Background Meniscal allograft transplantation has become a viable surgical alternative for a select group of patients with deficient or irreparable menisci. Subjective results are encouraging; long-term success, durability, and safety of allograft meniscal transplantation are uncertain. Purposes To evaluate a novel hydrogel meniscal replacement implant in an ovine model and assess chondroprotective effects of this hydrogel meniscal replacement using several validated outcome measures. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Fourteen skeletally mature sheep underwent hydrogel meniscal replacement; 45 additional animals had previously undergone 1 of 3 operations: lateral meniscectomy (24), meniscal allograft transplant (17), and sham (4). Animals were sacrificed at 2, 4, or 12 months. Cartilage was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, gross inspection, biomechanical testing, and semiquantitative histological analysis. Results There were no differences between the sham operation and nonoperated control limbs. Compared with meniscectomy, hydrogel meniscal replacement resulted in significantly decreased cartilage degeneration with all outcome parameters (P < .05). Compared with nonoperated control limbs, hydrogel meniscal replacements demonstrated no significant differences at 2 months in any category. By 4 months, hydrogel limbs demonstrated significantly greater cartilage degeneration than did nonoperated control limbs in all categories. Compared with meniscal allograft transplantation animals, hydrogel meniscal replacements demonstrated no differences at 2 months but had significantly increased cartilage degeneration in the peripheral zone of the tibial plateau at 4 months (P < .05). At 1 year, all hydrogel implants had developed complete radial splits in the posterior third of the implant. Conclusion Although promising preliminary results for hydrogel meniscal replacement were seen at early time points, significant cartilage degeneration and implant failure were seen at 1 year, and overall performance was worse than was allograft transplantation. Improvements in hydrogel material properties and surface characteristics and more accurate size matching may improve outcomes. Clinical Relevance Improvements in the hydrogel material properties and surface characteristics and more accurate size matching may lead to the use of hydrogel implants in humans.

[1]  H. Potter,et al.  Meniscal Allograft Transplantation in the Sheep Knee , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  R. Coutts,et al.  Indentation testing of human cartilage: sensitivity to articular surface degeneration. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  M. Oka,et al.  Development of an artificial meniscus using polyvinyl alcohol-hydrogel for early return to, and continuance of, athletic life in sportspersons with severe meniscus injury. I: mechanical evaluation. , 2003, The Knee.

[4]  M. Oka,et al.  Preliminary study of polyvinyl alcohol-hydrogel (PVA-H) artificial meniscus. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[5]  C. V. van Noorden,et al.  Structural analysis of meniscal allografts after immediate and delayed transplantation in rabbits. , 2002, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[6]  D. Kohn,et al.  Long-Term Results of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation * , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  E M Hasler,et al.  In situ compressive stiffness, biochemical composition, and structural integrity of articular cartilage of the human knee joint. , 2001, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[8]  S. Rodeo Meniscal Allografts—Where Do We Stand? , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  B. Shaffer,et al.  Preoperative Sizing of Meniscal Allografts in Meniscus Transplantation , 2000, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  G. Stollsteimer,et al.  Meniscal allograft transplantation: a 1- to 5-year follow-up of 22 patients. , 2000, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[11]  S. B. Adams,et al.  The surgical anatomy of the stifle joint in sheep. , 1998, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[12]  Mark D. Grabiner,et al.  Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics , 1998 .

[13]  R. Parker,et al.  The Effect of Allograft Meniscal Replacement on Intraarticular Contact Area and Pressures in the Human Knee , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  M. I. Chen,et al.  Is it important to secure the horns during lateral meniscal transplantation? A cadaveric study. , 1996, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[15]  J. Garrett Meniscal Transplantation: A Review of 43 Cases with 2− to 7‐Year Follow‐up , 1993 .

[16]  J. Drukker,et al.  The reliability of the mankin score for osteoarthritis , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  J. Garrett,et al.  Meniscal transplantation in the human knee: a preliminary report. , 1991, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[18]  V C Mow,et al.  Material properties and structure-function relationships in the menisci. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  R. Warren,et al.  The effect of lateral meniscectomy on motion of the knee. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  R. Aspden,et al.  Collagen orientations in the meniscus of the knee joint. , 1985, Journal of anatomy.

[21]  A V Swan,et al.  Late degenerative changes after meniscectomy. Factors affecting the knee after operation. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[22]  R. Warren,et al.  The effect of medial meniscectomy on anterior-posterior motion of the knee. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  T. Fukubayashi,et al.  Load-bearing mode of the knee joint: physical behavior of the knee joint with or without menisci. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  D G Wilder,et al.  Mechanical changes in the knee after meniscectomy. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  D B Kettelkamp,et al.  Factors effecting late results after meniscectomy. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  H. Dorfman,et al.  Biochemical and metabolic abnormalities in articular cartilage from osteo-arthritic human hips. II. Correlation of morphology with biochemical and metabolic data. , 1971, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  H J Mankin,et al.  Biochemical and metabolic abnormalities in articular cartilage from osteo-arthritic human hips. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  T. Fairbank Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. , 1948, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[29]  M. Oka,et al.  Development of an artificial meniscus using polyvinyl alcohol-hydrogel for early return to, and continuance of, athletic life in sportspersons with severe meniscus injury. II: animal experiments. , 2003, The Knee.

[30]  M. Schwartz Encyclopedia of smart materials , 2002 .

[31]  E. Goble,et al.  Indications for meniscal allograft reconstruction. , 1996, The American journal of knee surgery.

[32]  Wilcox Tr,et al.  Indications for meniscal allograft reconstruction. , 1996 .

[33]  B B Seedhom,et al.  The stiffness of normal articular cartilage and the predominant acting stress levels: implications for the aetiology of osteoarthrosis. , 1993, British journal of rheumatology.