Fit and Complementarity – Cognitive Distance and Combined Competence as Predictors of Co-Operative R&D Projects’ Outcomes in Europe

This article considers cognitive distance and combined competence as predictors of concrete outcomes in co-operative Research and Development projects. The operationalisation is based upon a dedicated survey, answered by matched pairs of projects managers in partnering organisations, addressing technical and scientific competence, R&D management competence and cultural features. Empirical validation was performed on 92 projects based in France, Germany and the United Kingdom in the industry of electronics and telecommunications equipment. Selected dimensions of the cognitive distance and of combined competence being developed appear to be better predictors of concrete project outcomes than geographic distance, differences in organisation size or in legal status.

[1]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  Technological proximity and the choice of cooperation partner , 2007 .

[2]  J. Knoben,et al.  Proximity and Inter-Organizational Collaboration: A Literature Review , 2006 .

[3]  Rachelle C. Sampson.  Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances , 2005 .

[4]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity , 2005 .

[5]  André Torre,et al.  Proximity and Localization , 2005 .

[6]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures , 2004 .

[7]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Nodes, networks and proximities: on the knowledge dynamics of the Medicon Valley biotech cluster , 2004 .

[8]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance , 2004 .

[9]  Massimo G. Colombo,et al.  Alliance form: a test of the contractual and competence perspectives , 2003 .

[10]  R. Butler,et al.  Managing Instability in Cross-Cultural Alliances , 2003 .

[11]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres,et al.  Mastering Alliance Strategy: A Comprehensive Guide to Design, Management, and Organization , 2002 .

[12]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Alliance capability, stock market response, and long‐term alliance success: the role of the alliance function , 2002 .

[14]  J. Hagedoorn.  Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[15]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[16]  B. Nooteboom.  Learning by Interaction: Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance , 2000 .

[17]  T. Das,et al.  Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective , 2000 .

[18]  F. Dwyer,et al.  An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes , 2000 .

[19]  Richard L. Divine,et al.  Creativity + business discipline = higher profits faster from new product development , 1999 .

[20]  Joseph W. Leonard.  Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value through Partnering , 1998 .

[21]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Commentary on ‘alliances and networks’ by R. Gulati , 1998 .

[22]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[23]  Alice Lam.  Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures , 1997 .

[24]  John W. Selsky,et al.  When the Stories are Different: The Influence of Corporate Culture Mismatches on Interorganizational Relations , 1995 .

[25]  Timothy J. Wilkinson,et al.  Strategic alliances: Choose your partners , 1995 .

[26]  W. Bridges,et al.  The Character of Organizations: Using Personality Type in Organization Development , 1995 .

[27]  Keith Hayward,et al.  Technological collaboration in industry: strategy, policy and internationalization in innovation , 1994 .

[28]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  Technological Collaboration in Industry: Strategy, Policy, and Internationalization in Innovation , 1993 .

[29]  J. Farley,et al.  Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis , 1993 .

[30]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[31]  Linda K. Kirby,et al.  Introduction to Type : A Guide to Understanding Your Results on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1980 .

[32]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[33]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[34]  M. Feldman,et al.  Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation , 2004 .

[35]  Jean-Benoît Zimmermann,et al.  Économie de proximités , 2004 .

[36]  B. RenÃ,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[37]  A. Hamdouch.  Coopération stratégique, coalitions interfirmes et réseau d'innovation: vers de nouveaux fondements de la dynamique concurrentielle ? , 2004 .

[38]  Andre Torre,et al.  Local organisations and institutions. How can geographical proximity be activated by collective projects? , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[39]  M. Smith,et al.  The Oxford handbook of economic geography. , 2003 .

[40]  Lydia Greunz,et al.  Geographically and technologically mediated knowledge spillovers between European regions , 2002 .

[41]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  “Being There”: Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies , 1995 .

[42]  M. Feldman.  The geography of innovation , 1994 .

[43]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[44]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .