Mechanistic inquiry into decrease in probability of defibrillation success with increase in complexity of preshock reentrant activity.

Energy requirements for successful antiarrhythmia shocks are arrhythmia specific. However, it remains unclear why the probability of shock success decreases with increasing arrhythmia complexity. The goal of this research was to determine whether a diminished probability of shock success results from an increased number of functional reentrant circuits in the myocardium, and if so, to identify the responsible mechanisms. To achieve this goal, we assessed shock efficacy in a bidomain defibrillation model of a 4-mm-thick slice of canine ventricles. Shocks were applied between a right ventricular cathode and a distant anode to terminate either a single scroll wave (SSW) or multiple scroll waves (MSWs). From the 160 simulations conducted, dose-response curves were constructed for shocks given to SSWs and MSWs. The shock strength that yielded a 50% probability of success (ED(50)) for SSWs was found to be 13% less than that for MSWs, which indicates that a larger number of functional reentries results in an increased defibrillation threshold. The results also demonstrate that an isoelectric window exists after both failed and successful shocks; however, shocks of strength near the ED(50) value that were given to SSWs resulted in 16.3% longer isoelectric window durations than the same shocks delivered to MSWs. Mechanistic inquiry into these findings reveals that the two main factors underlying the observed relationships are 1) smaller virtual electrode polarizations in the tissue depth, and 2) differences in preshock tissue state. As a result of these factors, intramural excitable pathways leading to delayed breakthrough on the surface were formed earlier after shocks given to MSWs compared with SSWs and thus resulted in a lower defibrillation threshold for shocks given to SSWs.

[1]  H. Karagueuzian,et al.  Optical Mapping of Ventricular Defibrillation in Isolated Swine Right Ventricles: Demonstration of a Postshock Isoelectric Window After Near-Threshold Defibrillation Shocks , 2001, Circulation.

[2]  P. Wolf,et al.  Influence of shock strength and timing on induction of ventricular arrhythmias in dogs. , 1988, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  R. A. Gray,et al.  Ventricular fibrillation and atrial fibrillation are two different beasts. , 1998, Chaos.

[4]  R. Kerber,et al.  Ventricular Tachycardia Rate and Morphology Determine Energy and Current Requirements for Transthoracic Cardioversion , 1992, Circulation.

[5]  N Trayanova,et al.  Termination of Spiral Waves with Biphasic Shocks: , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[6]  P D Wolf,et al.  Epicardial activation after unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in dogs. , 1988, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  W. Montgomery,et al.  Standards and guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care. , 1986, Circulation.

[8]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Shock-induced arrhythmogenesis in the myocardium. , 2002, Chaos.

[9]  S. Bach,et al.  Measurement of cardioversion/defibrillation thresholds in man by a truncated exponential waveform and an apical patch-superior vena caval spring electrode configuration. , 1984, Circulation.

[10]  P D Wolf,et al.  Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks. , 1986, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[11]  Natalia A Trayanova,et al.  Termination of Reentry by a Long‐Lasting AC Shock in a Slice of Canine Heart: A Computational Study , 2002, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[12]  I R Efimov,et al.  Reversal of Repolarization Gradient Does Not Reverse the Chirality of Shock‐Induced Reentry in the Rabbit Heart , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[13]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[14]  J. Keener Phase singularities and termination of spiral wave reentry. , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[15]  P D Wolf,et al.  Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open-chest dogs. , 1990, Circulation research.

[16]  F. Fenton,et al.  Multiple mechanisms of spiral wave breakup in a model of cardiac electrical activity. , 2002, Chaos.

[17]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Virtual Electrode Polarization Leads to Reentry in the Far Field , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[18]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Success and Failure of the Defibrillation Shock: , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[19]  R. Ideker,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Mapping of Earliest Activation after Near‐Threshold Ventricular Defibrillation Shocks , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[20]  H. Karagueuzian,et al.  Cellular mechanism of reentry induced by a strong electrical stimulus: implications for fibrillation and defibrillation. , 2001, Cardiovascular research.

[21]  R. Ideker,et al.  Epicardial Sock Mapping Following Monophasic and Biphasic Shocks of Equal Voltage with an Endocardial Lead System , 1996, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[22]  I R Efimov,et al.  Virtual electrode-induced phase singularity: a basic mechanism of defibrillation failure. , 1998, Circulation research.

[23]  R. Ideker,et al.  Mechanism of Ventricular Defibrillation for Near-Defibrillation Threshold Shocks: A Whole-Heart Optical Mapping Study in Swine , 2001, Circulation.

[24]  Felipe Aguel,et al.  Computer simulations of cardiac defibrillation: a look inside the heart , 2002 .

[25]  P. Hunter,et al.  Mathematical model of geometry and fibrous structure of the heart. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[26]  Natalia A Trayanova,et al.  Virtual Electrode‐Induced Positive and Negative Graded Responses: , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[27]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Effect of Strength and Timing of Transmembrane Current Pulses on Isolated Ventricular Myocytes , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[28]  N. Chattipakorn,et al.  Prediction of Defibrillation Outcome by Epicardial Activation Patterns Following Shocks Near the Defibrillation Threshold , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.