Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) recorded from neonates under 13 hours old using conventional and maximum length sequence (MLS) stimulation

Maximum length sequence (MLS) stimulation allows click evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) to be averaged at very high stimulation rates. This enables a faster reduction of noise contamination of the response, and has been shown to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of CEOAEs recorded from adult subjects. This study set out to investigate whether MLS averaging can enhance the SNR of CEOAEs recorded in newborns within the first day after birth, and so improve the pass rates for OAE screening in this period, when false alarm rates are very high. CEOAEs were recorded in a neonatal ward from 57 ears in 37 newborns ranging from 6 to 13h old, using both conventional (50/s) and high rate (5000/s) MLS averaging. SNR values and pass rates were compared for responses obtained within equal recording times at both rates. MLS averaging produced an SNR improvement of up to 3.8dB, with the greatest improvement found in higher frequency bands. This SNR advantage resulted in pass rate improvement between 5% and 10%, depending on pass criterion. A significant effect of age was found on both SNR and pass rate, with newborns between 6 and 10h old showing significantly lower values than those tested between 10 and 13h after birth, as well as a much greater improvement due to MLS averaging. The findings show that MLS averaging can reduce false alarm rates by up to 15% in very young neonates in a neonatal ward setting.

[1]  C. Abdala,et al.  Theory of forward and reverse middle-ear transmission applied to otoacoustic emissions in infant and adult ears. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  B. Vohr,et al.  External and middle ear status related to evoked otoacoustic emission in neonates. , 1993, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[3]  A R Thornton,et al.  Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Recorded Using Maximum Length Sequences as a Function of Stimulus Rate and Level , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[4]  Stephen T Neely,et al.  Ear-canal acoustic admittance and reflectance effects in human neonates. I. Predictions of otoacoustic emission and auditory brainstem responses. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M. Lutman,et al.  Static input-output non-linearity as the source of non-linear effects in maximum length sequence click-evoked OAEs , 2001, British journal of audiology.

[6]  D T Kemp,et al.  Assessment of an Implementation of a Narrow Band, Neonatal Otoacoustic Emission Screening Method , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[7]  C. Abdala,et al.  Maturation of cochlear nonlinearity as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in humans. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  A. Roger D. Thornton,et al.  Methodological factors involved in neonatal screening using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response testing , 2003, Hearing Research.

[9]  F Grandori,et al.  Data processing options and response scoring for OAE-based newborn hearing screening. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  A R Thornton,et al.  External- and middle-ear factors affecting evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. , 1993, British journal of audiology.

[11]  G R Popelka,et al.  Identification of Noise Sources That Influence Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Measurements in Human Neonates , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[12]  B McPherson,et al.  Neonatal Hearing Screening: Evaluation of Tone-Burst and Click-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Test Criteria , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[13]  A. Thornton,et al.  Temporal non-linearities of the cochlear amplifier revealed by maximum length sequence stimulation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  A. J. Klein,et al.  Pass/fail Rates for Repeated Click-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission and Auditory Brain Stem Response Screenings in Newborns , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[15]  C. Abdala A longitudinal study of distortion product otoacoustic emission ipsilateral suppression and input/output characteristics in human neonates. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  A R Thornton Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions: new techniques and applications. , 1993, British journal of audiology.

[17]  Antoinette Slaven,et al.  Comparison of transient evoked otoacoustic emission thresholds recorded conventionally and using maximum length sequences , 2001, Hearing Research.

[18]  D. Kemp,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Methods for the Detection of Otoacoustic Emissions , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[19]  The click-evoked oto-acoustic emission, c-EOAE, in preterm-born infants in the post conceptional age range between 30 and 68 weeks. , 1995, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[20]  J. Durrant,et al.  Development of f2/f1 ratio functions in humans. , 2004, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  A. Thornton,et al.  An investigation into the relationship between input–output nonlinearities and rate-induced nonlinearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences , 2006, Hearing Research.

[22]  C. Abdala,et al.  Effects of middle-ear immaturity on distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in infant ears. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  A R Thornton,et al.  Technical aspects of recording evoked otoacoustic emissions using maximum length sequences. , 1994, Scandinavian audiology.

[24]  P A Osterhammel,et al.  Instrumentation for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions elicited by maximum length sequences. , 1998, Scandinavian audiology.

[25]  P A Osterhammel,et al.  Neonatal hearing screening using otoacoustic emissions elicited by maximum length sequences. , 1998, British journal of audiology.

[26]  S. Purdy,et al.  Influence of acquisition parameters on the measurement of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates in a hospital environment. , 1996, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[27]  A R Thornton,et al.  High rate otoacoustic emissions. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  A. Slaven,et al.  Neonatal Otoacoustic Emissions Recorded Using Maximum Length Sequence Stimuli , 1998, Ear and hearing.