This study was carried out to evaluation of the effects on pruning weight (kg plant-1), cumulative pruning weight per plant (kg plant-1), and cumulative pruning weight per hectare (kg ha-1) of 3 quince rootstocks (BA29, Quince A, Quince MC) and 3 pear clonal rootstocks (Fox11, OHxF333, Farold 40) and pear seedling rootstocks grafted on 4 standard pear cultivars (‘Abate Fetel’, ‘Deveci’, ‘Santa Maria’, ‘Williams’) between 2019-2021 years. Rootstocks, cultivars, research years and their interactions significantly affected all examined parameters in the study, except for the interaction of year x rootstock x cultivar. Regarding rootstock averages, the highest pruning weight (kg plant-1) was observed from Fox 11, the lowest was in the BA29, QA, and MC quince rootstocks. Regardless of the cultivar averages, the highest pruning weight was in the 'Deveci’, the lowest was in the ‘Santa Maria’ pear cultivar. The highest pruning weight (kg plant-1) was observed from ‘Deveci'/Fox11, and the lowest was in the 'Williams'/QA, 'Williams'/BA29, 'Abate Fetel'/MC, and 'Santa Maria'/MC combinations in terms of rootstock x cultivar interaction. The highest cumulative pruning weight per plant (kg) was determined in the 'Deveci'/Fox11, the lowest was in the 'Williams'/QA combination in terms of rootstock x cultivar interaction. Furthermore, the highest cumulative pruning weight per hectare (kg) was determined in the 'Deveci’/Fox11, the lowest was in the ‘Williams’/QA, ‘Williams’/BA29, ‘Abate Fetel'/MC, 'Santa Maria'/MC, and 'Santa Maria'/Seedling combination in terms of rootstock x cultivar interaction. Except for the pear seedling rootstock, quince clone rootstocks generally had lower all pruning weight traits than pear clone rootstocks in the study. It can be said that the weaker development of quince rootstocks compared to pear rootstocks causes this situation. According to the results of this study carried out on young pear trees, it can be said that quince rootstocks are somewhat advantageous due to less pruning labor and cost
[1]
G. K. Almeida,et al.
Vegetative growth and productive performance of 'Abate Fetel' and 'Rocha' pear trees on quince rootstocks
,
2020
.
[2]
P. Clingeleffer,et al.
The significance of scion × rootstock interactions
,
2019,
OENO One.
[3]
A. Kaur,et al.
Effect of severity of pruning on growth, yield and quality in soft pear cv. Punjab Nectar.
,
2018
.
[4]
J. Fachinello,et al.
Prohexadione calcium controls shoot growth of pear trees under mild winter conditions
,
2017
.
[5]
Noriah Othman,et al.
Knowledge in Tree Pruning for Sustainable Practices in Urban Setting: Improving Our Quality of Life
,
2016
.
[6]
M. Booyse,et al.
Effect of rootstock on ‘Forelle’ pear (Pyrus communis L.) growth and production
,
2015
.
[7]
Fadi A Fathallah,et al.
Musculoskeletal disorders in labor-intensive agriculture.
,
2010,
Applied ergonomics.
[8]
M. Pascual,et al.
Performance of ‘Williams’ pear on five rootstocks
,
2003
.
[9]
F. Larsen,et al.
Rootstock influence (1965-1980) on yield, yield efficiency and tree size of 'Bartlett' and 'd'Anjou' pear
,
1984
.