Public Transit Network Connectivity

The service reliability of public transit operations is gaining increased attention as agencies face immediate problems in providing credible service and attempting to reduce operational cost. Unreliable service has been cited as the major deterrent element for existing and potential passengers. Because most public transit attributes are of a stochastic nature—travel time, dwell time, demand, and so forth—the passenger is likely to experience unplanned waiting and riding times. Missed transfers are major contributors to the reliability issues of any transit system; therefore, this work focuses on the connectivity of the transit network with the reliability and comfort of transfers in multilegged trips. Because of the physical and spatial characteristics of the transit routes, it is possible to categorize the transfers into three types: nonadjacent transfer points, adjacent transfer points, and shared transfer points. Each type of transfer contributes differently to the degree of connectivity of the transit system. On the basis of transit network of routes, spatial-based performance indicators are introduced and defined. That is followed by results of a case study of the transit networks of two Israeli midsize cities.

[1]  S. C. Wirasinghe,et al.  Determination of the number and locations of time points in transit schedule design — Case of a single run , 1995, Ann. Oper. Res..

[2]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Public Transit Planning and Operation: Theory, Modeling and Practice , 2007 .

[3]  Nigel H. M. Wilson,et al.  Bus network design , 1986 .

[4]  James H. Bookbinder,et al.  Synchronized scheduling and random delays in urban transit , 1990 .

[5]  J. Y. Yen,et al.  Finding the K Shortest Loopless Paths in a Network , 2007 .

[6]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Public Transit Simulation Model for Optimal Synchronized Transfers , 2008 .

[7]  Prianka N. Seneviratne,et al.  Transit Route Design Applications Using Geographic Information Systems , 1996 .

[8]  Maged Dessouky,et al.  REAL-TIME CONTROL OF BUSES FOR SCHEDULE COORDINATION AT A TERMINAL , 2003 .

[9]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Creating bus timetables with maximal synchronization , 2001 .

[10]  Maurizio Bielli,et al.  Genetic algorithms in bus network optimization , 2002 .

[11]  Ross R. Maxwell,et al.  Intercity Rail Fixed-Interval, Timed-Transfer, Multihub System: Applicability of the Integraler Taktfahrplan Strategy to North America , 1999 .

[12]  S. Mohan,et al.  TRANSIT ROUTE NETWORK DESIGN USING FREQUENCY CODED GENETIC ALGORITHM , 2003 .

[13]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED SYSTEM REPRESENTATION AND SEARCH PROCEDURES FOR TRANSIT ROUTE NETWORK DESIGN , 1992 .

[14]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Improving Bus Passenger Transfers on Road Segments through Online Operational Tactics , 2007 .

[15]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  Geographic information systems for transportation in perspective , 2000 .

[16]  Masaki Koshi,et al.  DESIGN OF PUBLIC TRANSIT NETWORK IN URBAN AREA WITH ELASTIC DEMAND , 1999 .

[17]  J. Y. Yen.  Finding the K Shortest Loopless Paths in a Network , 1971 .

[18]  Harold Moellering,et al.  The Scope and Conceptual Content of Analytical Cartography , 2000 .

[19]  James H. Bookbinder,et al.  Transfer Optimization in a Transit Network , 1992, Transp. Sci..

[20]  Mark D. Abkowitz,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROL OF HEADWAY VARIATION ON TRANSIT ROUTES , 1986 .

[21]  Keechoo Choi,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSIT NETWORK FROM A STREET MAP DATABASE WITH SPATIAL ANALYSIS AND DYNAMIC SEGMENTATION , 2000 .

[22]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Public Transit Planning and Operation , 2007 .

[23]  S. B. Pattnaik,et al.  Urban Bus Transit Route Network Design Using Genetic Algorithm , 1998 .

[24]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Hybrid route generation heuristic algorithm for the design of transit networks , 1995 .

[25]  Ray Wild,et al.  Optimization Algorithms for Networks and Graphs , 1980 .