Conceptual Foundations of Spatial Language: Evidence for a Goal Bias in Infants

We explored the pre-linguistic foundations of spatial language by testing how 12‐month-old infants represent sources and goals in Motion events (e.g., a duck moving out of a bowl and onto a block). Abundant evidence suggests that sources and goals are represented asymmetrically in languages, with goals taking a more prominent role than sources. We asked whether infants encode goals and sources as separate components of Motion events (Experiment 1) and whether they show asymmetric encoding of source and goal when they are part of the same Motion event (Experiment 2). Results showed that infants encode both goals and sources in separate events, but, when both are present, they encode goals in preference to sources. This Source-Goal asymmetry in infants' pre-linguistic representations of Motion events suggests a structure homologous to that found in language. The homology could provide the non-linguistic support for learning the language of events.

[1]  Francesco Orilia,et al.  Semantics and Cognition , 1991 .

[2]  B. Landau,et al.  “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition , 1993 .

[3]  Roger W. Brown,et al.  A First Language: The Early Stages , 1974 .

[4]  Terry Regier,et al.  An Attentional Constraint on Spatial Meaning , 2003 .

[5]  Amanda L. Woodward,et al.  Infants’ developing understanding of the link between looker and object , 2003 .

[6]  Susan C. Johnson,et al.  Infants' attribution of a goal to a morphologically unfamiliar agent. , 2004, Developmental science.

[7]  M. Potter,et al.  Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  D. Slobin.  Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar , 1973 .

[9]  S. Waxman,et al.  Object properties and object kind: twenty-one-month-old infants' extension of novel adjectives. , 1998, Child development.

[10]  D. Gentner.  Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[11]  Péter Szigetvári,et al.  What and When? , 2019, Inauguration and Liturgical Kingship in the Long Twelfth Century.

[12]  György Gergely,et al.  One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  R. Cohen,et al.  Plans for grasping objects , 2006 .

[14]  M. Bowerman.  Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective , 1996 .

[15]  R. Shiffrin.  Visual Free Recall , 1973, Science.

[16]  Jean M. Mandler,et al.  A summary of The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought , 2004 .

[17]  Lois Bloom,et al.  One Word at a Time: The Use of Single Word Utterances Before Syntax , 1976 .

[18]  Terry Regier,et al.  The Human Semantic Potential: Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism , 1996 .

[19]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  How Language Structures Space , 1983 .

[20]  Sunny Shin,et al.  Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs ? , 2005 .

[21]  Jeffrey Gruber.  Studies in lexical relations , 1965 .

[22]  A. Woodward.  Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach , 1998, Cognition.

[23]  M. Casasola,et al.  Infant categorization of containment, support and tight‐fit spatial relationships , 2002 .

[24]  G. Csibra,et al.  Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naı̈ve theory of rational action , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  E. Markman,et al.  When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth , 1994 .

[26]  Z. Nadasdy,et al.  Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age , 1995, Cognition.

[27]  Ikuyo Fujita,et al.  A Cognitive Approach to Errors in Case Marking in JapaneseAgrammatism , 2000 .

[28]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Thought before language: how deaf and hearing children express motion events across cultures , 2002, Cognition.

[29]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs? , 2005, Science.

[30]  J. J. Guajardo,et al.  Infants’ understanding of the point gesture as an object-directed action , 2002 .

[31]  Peter Gordon,et al.  The Origin of Argument Structure in Infant Event Representations , 2004 .

[32]  Melissa Bowerman,et al.  Early Syntactic Development: A Cross-Linguistic Study with Special Reference to Finnish , 1973 .

[33]  M. Potter,et al.  Pictorial and conceptual representation of glimpsed pictures. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  H. H. Clark.  SPACE, TIME, SEMANTICS, AND THE CHILD , 1973 .

[35]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  Seeing Pink Elephants: Fourteen-Month-Olds' Interpretations of Novel Nouns and Adjectives , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  J. Freyd,et al.  The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  M. Bowerman,et al.  Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns , 1991, Cognition.

[38]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[39]  Helene Intraub,et al.  Anticipatory spatial representation of natural scenes: Momentum without movement? , 2002 .

[40]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child , 1988 .

[41]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Can a Self-Propelled Box Have a Goal? , 2005, Psychological science.

[42]  C. Fisher.  Structural Limits on Verb Mapping: The Role of Analogy in Children's Interpretations of Sentences , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  E. Clark,et al.  The Notion of Source in Language Acquisition , 1989 .

[44]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  (1) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms; and , 1987 .

[45]  C. Fillmore.  Lectures on Deixis , 1997 .

[46]  B. Landau,et al.  Starting at the end: the importance of goals in spatial language , 2005, Cognition.

[47]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[48]  Laura Wagner,et al.  12-Month-Old Infants Represent Probable Endings of Motion Events. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.