First explanations for differences in electrotransfection efficiency in vitro and in vivo using spheroid model.

Electro-gene-therapy is a promising technique for cancer treatment. However, knowledge about mechanism of gene transfer with electric field in tumor is limited. Whereas in vitro electrotransfection is efficient, gene expression in tumoral cells in vivo is weak. To determine reasons for this difference and unravel gene transfer mechanisms, we propose to use multicellular tumor spheroid as a tridimensional model ex vivo. Comparison of efficiency between cell in suspension and cells in spheroid allow highlighting fundamental differences. For classical electrical conditions (consisting in 10 pulses of 500V/cm, 5ms, 1Hz), suspension cells present a transfection rate of 23.75%±2.450 SEM. In the same conditions on spheroid, although plasmid DNA coding GFP interact with half of electrically permeabilized cells, less than 1% of cells are expressing the transgene. First answers to in vivo electrotransfection failure are given: cell mortality due to electric field is responsible of this low transfection rate, as tridimensional and multicellular structure that prevents DNA passage. These results show that spheroid is reproducing in vivo situation. Validation of spheroid as a relevant model for electrotransfection study opens ex vivo optimization possibility before in vivo assay.

[1]  R. Del Maestro,et al.  Spheroid Preparation from Hanging Drops: Characterization of a Model of Brain Tumor Invasion , 2004, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[2]  L. Mir,et al.  Electrochemotherapy: a new treatment of solid tumors. , 2003, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[3]  M. Ogris,et al.  Tissue-dependent factors affect gene delivery to tumors in vivo , 2003, Gene Therapy.

[4]  Julie Gehl,et al.  Electrochemotherapy: results of cancer treatment using enhanced delivery of bleomycin by electroporation. , 2003, Cancer treatment reviews.

[5]  V. Lobjois,et al.  Cell cycle and apoptotic effects of SAHA are regulated by the cellular microenvironment in HCT116 multicellular tumour spheroids. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[6]  M. Villaverde,et al.  Suicide gene therapy on spontaneous canine melanoma: correlations between in vivo tumors and their derived multicell spheroids in vitro , 2010, Gene Therapy.

[7]  M. Rols,et al.  Observations of the mechanisms of electromediated DNA uptake--from vesicles to tissues. , 2010, Current gene therapy.

[8]  J P Freyer,et al.  Selective dissociation and characterization of cells from different regions of multicell tumor spheroids. , 1980, Cancer research.

[9]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Tissue electroporation: quantification and analysis of heterogeneous transport in multicellular environments. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[10]  M. Rols,et al.  Direct visualization at the single-cell level of electrically mediated gene delivery , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  M. Rols,et al.  A 3D in vitro spheroid model as a way to study the mechanisms of electroporation. , 2009, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[12]  M. Golzio,et al.  Factors Controlling Electropermeabilisation of Cell Membranes , 2002, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[13]  Ugo Carraro,et al.  Functional in vivo gene transfer into the myofibers of adult skeletal muscle. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[14]  Henry Hirschberg,et al.  Multicell tumor spheroids in photodynamic therapy , 2006, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[15]  R. Barr,et al.  Electromobility of plasmid DNA in tumor tissues during electric field-mediated gene delivery , 2002, Gene Therapy.

[16]  D. Miklavcic,et al.  Effective treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous malignant tumours by electrochemotherapy. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  Marie-Pierre Rols,et al.  What is (Still not) Known of the Mechanism by Which Electroporation Mediates Gene Transfer and Expression in Cells and Tissues , 2009, Molecular biotechnology.

[18]  Martin Fussenegger,et al.  Method for generation of homogeneous multicellular tumor spheroids applicable to a wide variety of cell types. , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[19]  M. Rols,et al.  In vivo electrically mediated protein and gene transfer in murine melanoma , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Richard Heller,et al.  In vivo electroporation for gene therapy. , 2006, Human gene therapy.

[21]  M. Čemažar,et al.  The effect of the histological properties of tumors on transfection efficiency of electrically assisted gene delivery to solid tumors in mice , 2007, Gene Therapy.

[22]  Juergen Friedrich,et al.  Experimental anti-tumor therapy in 3-D: Spheroids – old hat or new challenge? , 2007, International journal of radiation biology.

[23]  J. Sandoval,et al.  Three-dimensional neuroblastoma cell culture: proteomic analysis between monolayer and multicellular tumor spheroids , 2008, Pediatric Surgery International.

[24]  S. Sone,et al.  Apoptosis induction of human lung cancer cell line in multicellular heterospheroids with humanized antiganglioside GM2 monoclonal antibody. , 1999, Cancer research.

[25]  Damijan Miklavčič,et al.  Electrochemotherapy – An easy, highly effective and safe treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases: Results of ESOPE (European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy) study , 2006 .

[26]  W. Vandertop,et al.  The organotypic multicellular spheroid is a relevant three-dimensional model to study adenovirus replication and penetration in human tumors in vitro. , 2002, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[27]  Darius Moradpour,et al.  In vivo gene electroinjection and expression in rat liver , 1996, FEBS letters.

[28]  E Neumann,et al.  Control by pulse parameters of electric field-mediated gene transfer in mammalian cells. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[29]  R. Sutherland Cell and environment interactions in tumor microregions: the multicell spheroid model. , 1988, Science.

[30]  P. Indovina,et al.  Apoptosis, cell adhesion and the extracellular matrix in the three-dimensional growth of multicellular tumor spheroids. , 2000, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[31]  Richard Heller,et al.  Phase I trial of interleukin-12 plasmid electroporation in patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  S. Pun,et al.  Increased nanoparticle penetration in collagenase-treated multicellular spheroids , 2007, International journal of nanomedicine.

[33]  M. Bureau,et al.  High-efficiency gene transfer into skeletal muscle mediated by electric pulses. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  S. Sukharev,et al.  In vivo electroporation and stable transformation of skin cells of newborn mice by plasmid DNA. , 1991, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[35]  Mojca Pavlin,et al.  Dependence of induced transmembrane potential on cell density, arrangement, and cell position inside a cell system , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  R. Callaghan,et al.  Optimising non‐viral gene delivery in a tumour spheroid model , 2006, The journal of gene medicine.

[37]  J. Teissié,et al.  Highly efficient transfection of mammalian cells by electric field pulses. Application to large volumes of cell culture by using a flow system. , 1992, European journal of biochemistry.

[38]  Mojca Pavlin,et al.  Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment , 2003, European Biophysics Journal.