The Control of Automatic Imitation Based on Bottom–Up and Top–Down Cues to Animacy: Insights from Brain and Behavior

Humans automatically imitate other people's actions during social interactions, building rapport and social closeness in the process. Although the behavioral consequences and neural correlates of imitation have been studied extensively, little is known about the neural mechanisms that control imitative tendencies. For example, the degree to which an agent is perceived as human-like influences automatic imitation, but it is not known how perception of animacy influences brain circuits that control imitation. In the current fMRI study, we examined how the perception and belief of animacy influence the control of automatic imitation. Using an imitation–inhibition paradigm that involves suppressing the tendency to imitate an observed action, we manipulated both bottom–up (visual input) and top–down (belief) cues to animacy. Results show divergent patterns of behavioral and neural responses. Behavioral analyses show that automatic imitation is equivalent when one or both cues to animacy are present but reduces when both are absent. By contrast, right TPJ showed sensitivity to the presence of both animacy cues. Thus, we demonstrate that right TPJ is biologically tuned to control imitative tendencies when the observed agent both looks like and is believed to be human. The results suggest that right TPJ may be involved in a specialized capacity to control automatic imitation of human agents, rather than a universal process of conflict management, which would be more consistent with generalist theories of imitative control. Evidence for specialized neural circuitry that “controls” imitation offers new insight into developmental disorders that involve atypical processing of social information, such as autism spectrum disorders.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[3]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Does the Human Motor System Simulate Pinocchio's Actions? , 2007, Psychological science.

[4]  Geoffrey Bird,et al.  Enhancing Social Ability by Stimulating Right Temporoparietal Junction Tdcs of Right Tpj , 2022 .

[5]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[6]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Dissociating Modality-Specific and Supramodal Neural Systems for Action Understanding , 2012 .

[7]  G. Bird,et al.  Atypical Social Modulation of Imitation in Autism Spectrum Conditions , 2011, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modeling regional and psychophysiologic interactions in fMRI: the importance of hemodynamic deconvolution , 2003, NeuroImage.

[9]  D. Norris,et al.  BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: Parallel‐acquired inhomogeneity‐desensitized fMRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Attention modulates the specificity of automatic imitation to human actors , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  D. Perrett,et al.  Imitation, mirror neurons and autism , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[13]  C. Heyes Automatic imitation. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  M. Brass,et al.  The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: a functional double dissociation , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Sterling C. Johnson,et al.  A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): A comparison to standard approaches , 2012, NeuroImage.

[16]  Antonia F de C Hamilton,et al.  The neurocognitive mechanisms of imitation , 2015, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[17]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[18]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Unbroken mirrors: challenging a theory of Autism , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  C. Heyes,et al.  Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[22]  R. Adolphs,et al.  The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  Time course analyses confirm independence of imitative and spatial compatibility. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Richard Ramsey,et al.  The Control of Mimicry by Eye Contact Is Mediated by Medial Prefrontal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  T. Metzinger,et al.  Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Resisting motor mimicry: Control of imitation involves processes central to social cognition in patients with frontal and temporo-parietal lesions , 2010, Social neuroscience.

[27]  M. Brass,et al.  Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The simulating social mind: the role of the mirror neuron system and simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[30]  Clare Press,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Action Observation and Robotic Agents: Learning and Anthropomorphism , 2022 .

[31]  C. Heyes,et al.  Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[33]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Bottom‐up, not top‐down, modulation of imitation by human and robotic models , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  Ty W. Boyer,et al.  Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[35]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Control of shared representations relies on key processes involved in mental state attribution , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[36]  Antonia F. de C. Hamilton,et al.  Dissociation of mirroring and mentalising systems in autism , 2011, NeuroImage.

[37]  Frank Van Overwalle,et al.  Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis , 2009, NeuroImage.

[38]  R. Saxe Uniquely human social cognition , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[39]  E Poliakoff,et al.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence , 2012, Psychological Research.

[40]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The shaping of social perception by stimulus and knowledge cues to human animacy , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  M. Iacoboni Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[42]  A. Endress,et al.  The Social Sense: Susceptibility to Others’ Beliefs in Human Infants and Adults , 2010, Science.

[43]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[44]  Marcel Brass,et al.  The Inhibition of Imitative Response Tendencies , 2001, NeuroImage.

[45]  C. Frith,et al.  Rapid Response Subject Collections , 2022 .

[46]  U. Frith,et al.  Mindblind Eyes: An Absence of Spontaneous Theory of Mind in Asperger Syndrome , 2009, Science.

[47]  K. Vogeley,et al.  The Use of Virtual Characters to Assess and Train Non-Verbal Communication in High-Functioning Autism , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[48]  Jan Derrfuss,et al.  Imitative response tendencies in patients with frontal brain lesions. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[49]  Claus Lamm,et al.  Distinct neural processes are engaged in the modulation of mimicry by social group-membership and emotional expressions , 2015, Cortex.

[50]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Chapter 5 Human Mimicry , 2009 .

[51]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[52]  C. Frith,et al.  Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[53]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Where is the love? The social aspects of mimicry , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  Theory of mind performance in children correlates with functional specialization of a brain region for thinking about thoughts. , 2012, Child development.

[55]  M. Brass,et al.  Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.