Digital pathology imaging as a novel platform for standardization and globalization of quantitative nephropathology

Abstract The introduction of digital pathology to nephrology provides a platform for the development of new methodologies and protocols for visual, morphometric and computer-aided assessment of renal biopsies. Application of digital imaging to pathology made substantial progress over the past decade; it is now in use for education, clinical trials and translational research. Digital pathology evolved as a valuable tool to generate comprehensive structural information in digital form, a key prerequisite for achieving precision pathology for computational biology. The application of this new technology on an international scale is driving novel methods for collaborations, providing unique opportunities but also challenges. Standardization of methods needs to be rigorously evaluated and applied at each step, from specimen processing to scanning, uploading into digital repositories, morphologic, morphometric and computer-aided assessment, data collection and analysis. In this review, we discuss the status and opportunities created by the application of digital imaging to precision nephropathology, and present a vision for the near future.

[1]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review , 2009, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Sandrine Florquin,et al.  The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: rationale, clinicopathological correlations, and classification. , 2009, Kidney international.

[3]  P. Song,et al.  Morphometry Predicts Early GFR Change in Primary Proteinuric Glomerulopathies: A Longitudinal Cohort Study Using Generalized Estimating Equations , 2016, PloS one.

[4]  Richard J. Cote,et al.  Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies , 2014, Journal of pathology informatics.

[5]  Shazia Akbar,et al.  Comparing computer-generated and pathologist-generated tumour segmentations for immunohistochemical scoring of breast tissue microarrays , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  S. Cramer,et al.  International variation in histologic grading is large and persistent feedback does not improve reproducibility. , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[7]  Jesper Molin,et al.  Implementation of large-scale routine diagnostics using whole slide imaging in Sweden: Digital pathology experiences 2006-2013 , 2014, Journal of pathology informatics.

[8]  Eun Sun Lee,et al.  Histological grading of IgA nephropathy predicting renal outcome: revisiting H. S. Lee's glomerular grading system. , 2005, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[9]  Jane Kaye,et al.  Towards a data sharing Code of Conduct for international genomic research , 2011, Genome Medicine.

[10]  R S Weinstein,et al.  Telepathology and the networking of pathology diagnostic services. , 1987, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  M. Wehrmann,et al.  The consequences of tubulo-interstitial changes for renal function in glomerulopathies. A morphometric and cytological analysis. , 1990, Pathology, research and practice.

[12]  Let’s think about cognitive bias , 2015, Nature.

[13]  Bruce A Beckwith,et al.  Standards to support information systems integration in anatomic pathology. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[14]  John Tomaszewski,et al.  Digital pathology evaluation in the multicenter Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE). , 2013, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[15]  J. Hodgin,et al.  Podometrics as a Potential Clinical Tool for Glomerular Disease Management. , 2015, Seminars in nephrology.

[16]  R. Colvin,et al.  Novel quantitative method to evaluate globotriaosylceramide inclusions in renal peritubular capillaries by virtual microscopy in patients with fabry disease. , 2012, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[17]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Digital pathology and anatomic pathology laboratory information system integration to support digital pathology sign-out , 2016, Journal of pathology informatics.

[18]  Mitko Veta,et al.  Going fully digital: Perspective of a Dutch academic pathology lab , 2013, Journal of pathology informatics.

[19]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  Assessment of algorithms for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology images , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  Sumio Sugano,et al.  International code of conduct for genomic and health-related data sharing , 2014, The HUGO Journal.

[21]  Sandrine Florquin,et al.  Interobserver agreement of scoring of histopathological characteristics and classification of lupus nephritis. , 2007, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[22]  Fernand,et al.  The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: pathology definitions, correlations, and reproducibility. , 2009, Kidney international.

[23]  Nick Taub,et al.  Interobserver Reproducibility and Application of the ISN/RPS Classification of Lupus Nephritis—A UK-wide Study , 2006, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[24]  S. Hewitt,et al.  Morphology in the Digital Age: Integrating High-Resolution Description of Structural Alterations With Phenotypes and Genotypes. , 2015, Seminars in nephrology.

[25]  K. Lemley.  Diabetes and chronic kidney disease: lessons from the Pima Indians , 2008, Pediatric Nephrology.

[26]  M. Mengel,et al.  Banff Initiative for Quality Assurance in Transplantation (BIFQUIT): Reproducibility of Polyomavirus Immunohistochemistry in Kidney Allografts , 2014, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[27]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Observer variability in the interpretation of HER2/neu immunohistochemical expression with unaided and computer-aided digital microscopy. , 2011, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[28]  M. Haas,et al.  The Revised (2013) Banff Classification for Antibody‐Mediated Rejection of Renal Allografts: Update, Difficulties, and Future Considerations , 2016, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[29]  Marios A. Gavrielides,et al.  Observer Performance in the Use of Digital and Optical Microscopy for the Interpretation of Tissue-Based Biomarkers , 2014, Analytical cellular pathology.

[30]  P. Furness,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of the diagnostic accuracy of internet‐based telepathology compared with conventional microscopy , 2007, Histopathology.

[31]  A. Rule,et al.  Detection and Clinical Patterns of Nephron Hypertrophy and Nephrosclerosis Among Apparently Healthy Adults. , 2016, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[32]  Katrin Uhlig,et al.  Risk Prediction Models for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[33]  Alexis B. Carter,et al.  Computational Pathology: A Path Ahead. , 2016, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[34]  Kuang-Yu Jen,et al.  Reliability of whole slide images as a diagnostic modality for renal allograft biopsies. , 2013, Human pathology.

[35]  P. Furness.  Histopathology of chronic renal allograft dysfunction. , 2001, Transplantation.

[36]  H. E. Hansen,et al.  The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. , 1999, Kidney international.

[37]  Philip F Halloran,et al.  Superiority of virtual microscopy versus light microscopy in transplantation pathology , 2012, Clinical transplantation.

[38]  A. Rule,et al.  Distinguishing age-related from disease-related glomerulosclerosis on kidney biopsy: the Aging Kidney Anatomy study. , 2015, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[39]  A. Rule,et al.  Structural and Functional Changes With the Aging Kidney. , 2016, Advances in chronic kidney disease.

[40]  Lee Hebert,et al.  The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. , 2004, Kidney international.

[41]  Stephen M. Hewitt,et al.  The Application of Digital Pathology to Improve Accuracy in Glomerular Enumeration in Renal Biopsies , 2016, PloS one.

[42]  Chrysta C. Meadowbrooke,et al.  Glomerular Aging and Focal Global Glomerulosclerosis: A Podometric Perspective. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[43]  C. Sima,et al.  Classification of thymic epithelial neoplasms is still a challenge to thoracic pathologists: a reproducibility study using digital microscopy. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[44]  S. Hewitt,et al.  Reproducibility of the NEPTUNE descriptor-based scoring system on whole-slide images and histologic and ultrastructural digital images , 2016, Modern Pathology.

[45]  Kristine A. Erps,et al.  Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. , 2009, Human pathology.

[46]  N. Kambham,et al.  A study of interobserver reproducibility of morphologic lesions of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis , 2013, Virchows Archiv.

[47]  Yukako Yagi,et al.  Digital imaging in pathology: the case for standardization , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.