Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes

The idea that policy makers in different states or countries may learn from one another has fascinated scholars for a long time, but little systematic evidence has been produced so far. This article improves our understanding of this elusive argument by distinguishing between the policy and political consequences of reforms and by emphasizing the conditional nature of learning processes. Using a directed dyadic approach and multilevel methods, the analysis of unemployment benefits retrenchment in OECD countries demonstrates that policy makers learn selectively from the experience of others. Right governments tend to be more sensitive to information on the electoral consequences of reforms, while left governments are more likely to be influenced by their policy effects.

[1]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[2]  A. Brix Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn , 2005 .

[3]  Covadonga Meseguer Rational Learning and Bounded Learning in the Diffusion of Policy Innovations , 2006 .

[4]  C. Volden,et al.  States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children's Health Insurance Program , 2006 .

[5]  R. Franzese,et al.  The Spatial Probit Model of Interdependent Binary Outcomes: Estimation, Interpretation, and Presentation , 2008 .

[6]  Scott J. Basinger,et al.  Remodeling the Competition for Capital: How Domestic Politics Erases the Race to the Bottom , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[7]  Sarah M. Brooks When Does Diffusion Matter? Explaining the Spread of Structural Pension Reforms Across Nations , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[8]  D. S. Bennett,et al.  Research Design and Estimator Choices in the Analysis of Interstate Dyads , 2000 .

[9]  Zachary Elkins,et al.  The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[10]  Michael M. Ting,et al.  A Formal Model of Learning and Policy Diffusion , 2008, American Political Science Review.

[11]  Kurt Weyland Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion , 2006 .

[12]  S. Luyet,et al.  Learning From Others , 2009 .

[13]  Frederick J. Boehmke,et al.  Policy Emulation or Policy Convergence? Potential Ambiguities in the Dyadic Event History Approach to State Policy Emulation , 2009, The Journal of Politics.

[14]  Kurt Weyland Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform , 2005 .

[15]  David J. Samuels,et al.  Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes , 2007, British Journal of Political Science.

[16]  Robert J. Franzese,et al.  Interdependence in Comparative Politics , 2008 .

[17]  Covadonga Meseguer Learning, Policy Making, and Market Reforms , 2009 .

[18]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  The mechanisms of policy diffusion , 2008 .

[19]  E. Neumayer,et al.  Spatial Effects in Dyadic Data , 2009, International Organization.

[20]  Kurt Weyland Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America , 2007 .

[21]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[22]  Duane H. Swank Tax Policy in an Era of Internationalization: Explaining the Spread of Neoliberalism , 2006, International Organization.

[23]  Zeev Maoz,et al.  Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986 , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[24]  Luke Keele,et al.  A Bayesian Multilevel Modeling Approach to Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data , 2007, Political Analysis.

[25]  Zeev Maoz,et al.  NORMATIVE AND STRUCTURAL CAUSES OF DEMOCRATIC PEACE , 1993 .

[26]  Daniel Wincott,et al.  Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States , 2003 .

[27]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism , 2006, International Organization.

[28]  Virginia Gray,et al.  Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[29]  Jack L. Walker The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[30]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon , 2001, International Organization.

[31]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States , 2006 .

[32]  Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960-2000 , 2006 .

[33]  L. Román The Institutional Environment , 1999 .

[34]  F. Gilardi,et al.  Empirical Modeling of Policy Diffusion in Federal States: The Dyadic Approach , 2008 .

[35]  G. King,et al.  Proper Nouns and Methodological Propriety: Pooling Dyads in International Relations Data , 2001, International Organization.

[36]  Randolph M. Siverson,et al.  The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990 , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[37]  Gary King,et al.  Improving Forecasts of State Failure , 2001 .

[38]  Eliza S. Homer,et al.  Galton's Problem in Cross-National Research , 1976, World Politics.

[39]  Witold J. Henisz The Institutional Environment for Multinational Investment , 2000 .

[40]  Charles S. Taber,et al.  Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs , 2006 .

[41]  Lyle Scruggs,et al.  Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies , 2004 .

[42]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition, or Learning? , 2007 .

[43]  David Strang,et al.  The International Diffusion of Public-Sector Downsizing: Network Emulation and Theory-Driven Learning , 2006, International Organization.

[44]  Erik Gartzke,et al.  The Capitalist Peace , 2007 .

[45]  David J. Samuels,et al.  Voting in Open Economies , 2007 .

[46]  D. Gibbons Clear and clean , 2006 .

[47]  Curtis S. Signorino,et al.  Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data , 2010, Political Analysis.

[48]  Bruce Russett,et al.  Clear and Clean: The Fixed Effects of the Liberal Peace , 2001, International Organization.

[49]  D. Green,et al.  Dirty Pool , 2001, International Organization.

[50]  Fabrizio Gilardi,et al.  What is new in the study of policy diffusion? , 2009 .

[51]  D. Braun,et al.  Taking ‘Galton's Problem’ Seriously , 2006 .

[52]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.