Patient Outcomes in the Operative and Nonoperative Management of High-Grade Spondylolisthesis in Children

Background: The optimal management of high-grade spondylolisthesis in the growing child is controversial. Some authors have advocated for surgery in all cases regardless of symptoms. Surgical intervention results in a >10% risk of complications with increased risk of neurological injury associated with slip reduction maneuvers. There is a paucity of literature regarding nonoperative management in this setting. This study sought to obtain outcome measures in pediatric patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis managed either operatively or nonoperatively. Methods: Database review was performed to identify patients with a high-grade (Meyerding grade III to V) spondylolisthesis managed either operatively or nonoperatively. Retrospective radiographic and chart review was performed. Patients were then contacted by phone to obtain current quality-of-life measurements using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-30 questionnaire. Results: Fifty-three patients were identified for inclusion in the study and 49 were contacted for 92% follow-up. Twenty-four patients were treated with operative intervention, and 25 patients were initially treated nonoperatively, but 10 went on to require surgical intervention. Mean age at presentation was 12.6 years (range, 8 to 17 y) and mean age at follow-up was 20.1 years (range, 10 to 29 y). There were no outcome differences between the groups. A more kyphotic slip angle was associated with worse SRS-30 outcome scores across all groups. In the nonoperative group, the slip angle was significantly larger in patients who failed conservative treatment (34±17 degrees) than in those who remained nonsurgical at final follow-up (20±14 degrees). Slip angle in the operative group was 27±14 degrees. In surgical patients, an older age at surgery was associated with better SRS-30 outcome scores. Conclusions: Nonoperative management or “watchful waiting” of the minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic child with a high-grade spondylolisthesis is safe and does not lead to significant problems. Operative intervention for the symptomatic patient achieves similar long-term results compared with patients whose minimal symptoms do not warrant surgery. Delayed surgical intervention does not result in worse outcomes. Regardless of treatment modality, patients with a more kyphotic slip angle tend to have a poorer prognosis. Level of Evidence: Level III.

[1]  J. Mac-Thiong,et al.  Spino-pelvic sagittal balance of spondylolisthesis: a review and classification , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[2]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Morbidity and Mortality in the Surgical Treatment of Six Hundred Five Pediatric Patients With Isthmic or Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis , 2011, Spine.

[3]  J. Mac-Thiong,et al.  Radiological and clinical outcome of non surgical management for pediatric high grade spondylolisthesis. , 2010, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[4]  J. D. De Guise,et al.  Developmental spondylolisthesis: is slip angle related to quality of life? , 2010, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[5]  D. Schlenzka,et al.  Long-term health-related quality of life after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  L. Lenke,et al.  Is the SRS-22 Instrument Responsive to Change in Adult Scoliosis Patients Having Primary Spinal Deformity Surgery? , 2007, Spine.

[7]  Hubert Labelle,et al.  Classification of High-Grade Spondylolistheses Based on Pelvic Version and Spine Balance: Possible Rationale for Reduction , 2007, Spine.

[8]  A. Mehbod,et al.  Evidence-Based Medicine Analysis of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Treatment Including Reduction Versus Fusion In Situ for High-Grade Slips , 2007, Spine.

[9]  D. Schlenzka,et al.  Scoliosis Research Society Outcome Instrument in Evaluation of Long-Term Surgical Results in Spondylolysis and Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis in Young Patients , 2005, Spine.

[10]  V. Deviren,et al.  Studies in the Modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument in Adults: Validation, Reliability, and Discriminatory Capacity , 2003, Spine.

[11]  B. Fredrickson,et al.  The Natural History of Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis: 45-Year Follow-up Evaluation , 2003, Spine.

[12]  D. Burton,et al.  Further Development and Validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Outcomes Instrument , 2000, Spine.

[13]  J. Lonstein,et al.  Spondylolisthesis in children. Cause, natural history, and management. , 1999, Spine.

[14]  J. Dubousset Treatment of Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis in Children and Adolescents , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  H. Saraste,et al.  Long-term clinical and radiological follow-up of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. , 1987, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[16]  S. Weinstein,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients with grade-III and IV spondylolisthesis. Treatment with and without posterior fusion. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  L. Wiltse,et al.  Treatment of spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis in children. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  A. Walch [Spondylolisthesis in children]. , 1958, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.