Equilibrium in Gibbsian Statistical Mechanics

Consider a macroscopic system such as a gas or a solid, and assume that this system is described by macroscopic variables such as temperature, pressure, volume and magnetization. Intuitively, a system has reached equilibrium when all change has come to a halt and the values of the macroscopic variables remain constant over time. How can equilibrium be characterized exactly, and why and how do systems that are not initially in an equilibrium state approach equilibrium? It is the aim of statistical mechanics (SM) to answer these questions in terms of the mechanical properties of the micro-constituents of these systems and the dynamical laws that govern their time evolution. Gibbsian SM (GSM) offers answers to these questions by associating an ensemble with each physical system. Let X be the state space of a system of interest. In a mechanical n-particle system, for instance, the state space has 6n dimensions, three dimensions for the position of each particle and three dimensions for the corresponding momenta. An ensemble is specifed by a probability density ρ(x, t) over the state space of a system, where t is time (which can be either continuous or discrete) and x ∈ X . Physical observables are associated with real-valued functions f : X → R. These functions represent physical quantities, such as internal energy, magnetization, and polarization. The ensemble average (or sometimes “phase average”) of an observable is: Z hf i = f (x)ρ(x, t)dx (28.1) X

[1]  R. Frigg,et al.  When do Gibbsian phase averages and Boltzmannian equilibrium values agree? , 2020, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.

[2]  Jos Uffink,et al.  The constraint rule of the maximum entropy principle , 1996 .

[3]  Roman Frigg,et al.  Statistical Mechanics: A Tale of Two Theories , 2019, The Monist.

[4]  J. Blatt An Alternative Approach to the Ergodic Problem , 1959 .

[5]  Roman Frigg,et al.  Can Somebody Please Say What Gibbsian Statistical Mechanics Says? , 2018, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[6]  Jos Uffink,et al.  Can the maximum entropy principle be explained as a consistency requirement , 1995 .

[7]  Sheldon Goldstein,et al.  Boltzmann's Approach to Statistical Mechanics , 2001, cond-mat/0105242.

[8]  Robert W. Batterman,et al.  Randomness and Probability in Dynamical Theories: On the Proposals of the Prigogine School , 1991, Philosophy of Science.

[9]  Christopher R. Hitchcock Introduction: What is the Philosophy of Science , 2004 .

[10]  J. Dougherty Explaining statistical mechanics , 1993 .

[11]  C. Callender Reducing Thermodynamics to Statistical Mechanics: The Case of Entropy , 1999 .

[12]  J. Bricmont SCIENCE OF CHAOS OR CHAOS IN SCIENCE? , 1995, chao-dyn/9603009.

[13]  Frederick M. Kronz,et al.  The Ergodic Hierarchy , 2011 .

[14]  P. Rysselberghe Mathematical foundations of statistical mechanics. , 1949 .

[15]  Anjan Chakravartty,et al.  The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science , 2000 .

[16]  R. Frigg,et al.  Explaining Thermodynamic-Like Behavior in Terms of Epsilon-Ergodicity* , 2011, Philosophy of Science.

[17]  Jozef B Uffink Compendium of the Foundations of Classical Statistical Physics , 2007 .

[18]  Mehran Kardar,et al.  Statistical physics of particles , 2007 .

[19]  G. Barton Foundations of statistical mechanics , 1989 .

[20]  M. Redhead From physics to metaphysics , 1995 .

[21]  Glenn Shafer Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach , 2007 .

[22]  P. B. Vranas Epsilon-Ergodicity and the Success of Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics , 1998, Philosophy of Science.

[23]  Jos Uunk,et al.  Can the Maximum Entropy Principle Be Explained as a Consistency Requirement? , 1997 .

[24]  R. Frigg,et al.  Taming Abundance: On the Relation between Boltzmannian and Gibbsian Statistical Mechanics , 2020, Statistical Mechanics and Scientific Explanation.

[25]  Katinka Ridderbos,et al.  The coarse-graining approach to statistical mechanics: how blissful is our ignorance? , 2002 .

[26]  Boltzmann and Gibbs: An attempted reconciliation , 2004, cond-mat/0401061.

[27]  Domenico Giulini,et al.  The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time , 2008 .

[28]  Stephan Hartmann,et al.  Probabilities in physics , 2011 .

[29]  P. Pearce PRINCIPLES OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS , 1998 .

[30]  J. Plato Reductive relations in interpretations of probability , 1981, Synthese.

[31]  Ute Dreher,et al.  Statistical Mechanics Rigorous Results , 2016 .

[32]  J. Gillis,et al.  Probability and Related Topics in Physical Sciences , 1960 .

[33]  E. Hahn,et al.  Spin Echoes , 2011 .

[34]  V. Karakostas On the Brussels School's Arrow of Time in Quantum Theory , 1996, Philosophy of Science.

[35]  R. Frigg A Field Guide to Recent Work on the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. , 2008, 0804.0399.

[36]  J. V. Lith Ergodic Theory, Interpretations of Probability and the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics , 2001 .

[37]  Lawrence B. Sklar Statistical Explanation and Ergodic Theory , 1973, Philosophy of Science.

[38]  Srikanth Sastry,et al.  Physics and chance. Philosophical issues in the foundations of statistical mechanics , 1995 .

[39]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[40]  George D. J. Phillies,et al.  Elementary Lectures in Statistical Mechanics , 1999 .

[41]  M. Redhead,et al.  The Spin-Echo Experiments and the Second Law of Thermodynamics , 1998 .

[42]  M. Badino The Foundational Role of Ergodic Theory , 2006 .

[43]  R. Frigg,et al.  Mind the Gap: Boltzmannian versus Gibbsian Equilibrium , 2017, Philosophy of Science.

[44]  The Spin-Echo System Reconsidered , 2003, cond-mat/0311527.

[45]  A. Compagner Thermodynamics as the continuum limit of statistical mechanics , 1989 .

[46]  Joshua Luczak On How to Approach the Approach to Equilibrium , 2016, Philosophy of Science.

[47]  J. Earman,et al.  Why Ergodic Theory Does Not Explain the Success of Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics , 1996, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[48]  Jean Bricmont,et al.  Bayes, Boltzmann and Bohm: Probabilities in Physics , 2001 .

[49]  P. M. Ainsworth The Spin-Echo Experiment and Statistical Mechanics , 2005 .

[50]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[51]  J. V. Lith Reconsidering the Concept of Equilibrium in Classical Statistical Mechanics , 1999 .

[52]  Mario Bunge,et al.  Philosophy of Physics , 1972 .

[53]  Robert W. Batterman,et al.  Why Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics Works: Universality and the Renormalization Group , 1998, Philosophy of Science.

[54]  R. Streater,et al.  Statistical dynamics: a stochastic approach to nonequilibrium thermodynamics , 1995 .

[55]  David Wallace,et al.  Implications of quantum theory in the foundations of statistical mechanics , 2001 .

[56]  E. T. Jaynes,et al.  Papers on probability, statistics and statistical physics , 1983 .

[57]  Lawrence Sklar,et al.  Physics and Chance , 1993 .

[58]  Robert C. Bishop,et al.  Nonequilibrium statistical mechanics Brussels–Austin style , 2004 .

[59]  J. van Lith Reconsidering the Concept of Equilibrium in Classical Statistical Mechanics , 1999, Philosophy of Science.