Evaluation of target volume margins for radiotherapy of prostate implanted with fiducial markers

The planning target volume (PTV) depends on the method of radiotherapy guidance. This study aimed to measure the systemic and random errors using an online marker matching and offline bone structure matching to estimate PTV marker , PTV bone , or PTV laser for treatment verification and radiotherapy guidance, especially in centers lacking radiotherapy fiducial markers (FMs). Thirty patients with localized prostate cancer who were treated with FM-based dose escalation protocol were included. The initial set-up was done with laser marks and daily megavoltage images were acquired. The systematic and random errors were calculated. PTV marker , defined as the sum of maximum marker migration, and PTV calculated to compensate for the difference between online marker matching and offline analysis of marker matching. PTV marker was added to estimated PTV from online marker matching to obtain PTV laser . PTV skin marks migration , was calculated and deducted from PTV laser to acquire PTV bone . The mean maximum marker migration was 2 ± 1.2 mm. The resultant values of PTV marker were 2.7 ± 0.6 mm, 3.3 ± 1.1 mm, and 4.4 ± 2.2 mm, in the lateral (lat.), longitudinal (long) & vertical (vert.) directions, respectively, whereas values of PTV laser were 13 ± 0.6 mm, 17.7 ± 1.1 mm, and 15.8 ± 2.2 mm, and PTV bone were 5.9 ± 0.6 mm, 8.6 ± 1.1 mm, 7.2 ± 2.2 mm, respectively, in the lat., long., and vert. directions. Our results show that PTV needed with FM-based image guidance ranged between 3 and 4 mm in the three cardinal directions, was 10 mm smaller than that required with laser skin marks guidance, and narrower by 5 mm compared to that obtained by offline bone structure image matching.

[1]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  Clinical feasibility study for the use of implanted gold seeds in the prostate as reliable positioning markers during megavoltage irradiation. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  T. Rosewall,et al.  Comparison of localization performance with implanted fiducial markers and cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Patricia Tai,et al.  Planning target volume margins for prostate radiotherapy using daily electronic portal imaging and implanted fiducial markers , 2010, Radiation oncology.

[5]  Daniel M Aebersold,et al.  Daily organ tracking in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer using an electronic portal imaging device with a dose saving acquisition mode. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  T. Eade,et al.  Daily online bony correction is required for prostate patients without fiducial markers or soft-tissue imaging. , 2011, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[7]  David D. Smith,et al.  Pitch, roll, and yaw variations in patient positioning. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Diana Handrahan,et al.  Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer comparing kV imaging of fiducial markers with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  R. Alonzi,et al.  Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer with cone beam CT: dosimetric effects of imaging frequency and PTV margin. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  C. Lagares-Franco,et al.  Image-Guided Radiotherapy Using MV for Prostate Cancer: A Correlation Analysis between Electronic Portal Imaging with Fiducial Markers and Cone Beam CT , 2016 .

[11]  D. Taussky,et al.  Impact of concurrent androgen deprivation on fiducial marker migration in external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Karl Bzdusek,et al.  What CTV-to-PTV margins should be applied for prostate irradiation? Four-dimensional quantitative assessment using model-based deformable image registration techniques. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  P. Evans,et al.  A comparison of the use of bony anatomy and internal markers for offline verification and an evaluation of the potential benefit of online and offline verification protocols for prostate radiotherapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Changhu Chen,et al.  Determination of optimal PTV margin for patients receiving CBCT‐guided prostate IMRT: comparative analysis based on CBCT dose calculation with four different margins , 2015, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[16]  G. Ezzell,et al.  A Prospective Trial of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Incorporating a Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Prostate Cancer: Long-term Outcomes Compared With Standard Image Guided IMRT. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  C. Rübe,et al.  Set-up errors and planning margins in planar and CBCT image-guided radiotherapy using three different imaging systems: A clinical study for prostate and head-and-neck cancer. , 2015, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[18]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Examining margin reduction and its impact on dose distribution for prostate cancer patients undergoing daily cone-beam computed tomography. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  D. Taussky,et al.  Migration of intraprostatic fiducial markers and its influence on the matching quality in external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  Arjan Bel,et al.  Influence of daily setup measurements and corrections on the estimated delivered dose during IMRT treatment of prostate cancer patients. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Daily variations in delivered doses in patients treated with radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  R. Cendales,et al.  Displacements of fiducial markers in patients with prostate cancer treated with image guided radiotherapy: A single-institution descriptive study. , 2015, Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology.

[23]  Alan R Hounsell,et al.  Fiducial marker guided prostate radiotherapy: a review. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[24]  M. Adamczyk,et al.  Evaluation of combining bony anatomy and soft tissue position correction strategies for IMRT prostate cancer patients. , 2012, Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology.

[25]  R. Leung,et al.  Effectiveness of a Patient-Specific Immobilization and Positioning System to Limit Interfractional Translation and Rotation Setup Errors in Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancers , 2016 .

[26]  P. Greer,et al.  Does the planning dose-volume histogram represent treatment doses in image-guided prostate radiation therapy? Assessment with cone-beam computerised tomography scans. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[27]  T. Rosewall,et al.  The effect of changing technique, dose, and PTV margin on therapeutic ratio during prostate radiotherapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.