A Bayesian Approach to Estimating Coupling Between Neural Components: Evaluation of the Multiple Component, Event-Related Potential (mcERP) Algorithm

Accurate measurement of single-trial responses is key to a definitive use of complex electromagnetic and hemodynamic measurements in the investigation of brain dynamics. We developed the multiple component, Event-Related Potential (mcERP) approach to single-trial response estimation to improve our resolution of dynamic interactions between neuronal ensembles located in different layers within a cortical region and/or in different cortical regions. The mcERP model asserts that multiple components defined as stereotypic waveforms comprise the stimulus-evoked response and that these components may vary in amplitude and latency from trial to trial. Maximum a posteriori (MAP) solutions for the model are obtained by iterating a set of equations derived from the posterior probability. Our first goal was to use the mcERP algorithm to analyze interactions (specifically latency and amplitude correlation) between responses in different layers within a cortical region. Thus, we evaluated the model by applying the algorithm to synthetic data containing two correlated local components and one independent far-field component. Three cases were considered: the local components were correlated by an interaction in their single-trial amplitudes, by an interaction in their single-trial latencies, or by an interaction in both amplitude and latency. We then analyzed the accuracy with which the algorithm estimated the component waveshapes and the single-trial parameters as a function of these relationships. Extensions of these analyses to real data are discussed as well as ongoing work to incorporate more detailed prior information.

[1]  E. G. Jones Cerebral Cortex , 1987, Cerebral Cortex.

[2]  S. Bressler,et al.  Trial-to-trial variability of cortical evoked responses: implications for the analysis of functional connectivity , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Kevin H. Knuth,et al.  Convergent Bayesian formulations of blind source separation and electromagnetic source estimation , 1999 .

[4]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Separation of multiple evoked responses using differential amplitude and latency variability , 2002, physics/0204085.

[5]  C. Schroeder,et al.  A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Steven L. Bressler,et al.  Multiple Component Event-Related Potential (mcERP) Estimation , 2002 .

[7]  Jean Bullier,et al.  The Timing of Information Transfer in the Visual System , 1997 .

[8]  John Skilling,et al.  Data analysis : a Bayesian tutorial , 1996 .

[9]  H E M Journal of Neurophysiology , 1938, Nature.

[10]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  A New Learning Algorithm for Blind Signal Separation , 1995, NIPS.

[11]  Kevin H. Knuth,et al.  Bayesian source separation and localization , 1998, Optics & Photonics.

[12]  A C C Gibbs,et al.  Data Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[13]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Signal timing across the macaque visual system. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  E. Jaynes Probability theory : the logic of science , 2003 .

[15]  a.R.V.,et al.  Clinical neurophysiology , 1961, Neurology.