Postfire Recovery of Sagebrush Communities: Assessment Using Spot-5 and Very Large-Scale Aerial Imagery

Abstract Much interest lies in long-term recovery rates of sagebrush communities after fire in the western United States, as sagebrush communities comprise millions of hectares of rangelands and are an important wildlife habitat. Little is known about postfire changes in sagebrush canopy cover over time, especially at a landscape scale. We studied postfire recovery of shrub canopy cover in sagebrush-steppe communities with the use of spectral mixture analysis. Our study included 16 different fires that burned between 1937 and 2005 and one unburned site at the US Sheep Experiment Station in eastern Idaho. Spectral mixture analysis was used with September 2006 Systeme Pour l'Observation de la Terre-5 (SPOT-5) satellite imagery to estimate percent shrub canopy cover within pixels. Very large-scale aerial (VLSA) imagery with 24-mm resolution was used for training and validation. SPOT-5 image classification was successful and the spectral mixture analysis estimates of percent shrub canopy cover were highly correlated with the shrub canopy cover estimates in the VLSA imagery (R2  =  0.82; P < 0.0001). Additional accuracy assessment of shrub classification produced 85% overall accuracy, 98% user's accuracy, and 78% producer's accuracy. This successful application of spectral mixture analysis has important implications for the monitoring and assessment of sagebrush-steppe communities. With the use of the percent shrub canopy cover estimates from the classified SPOT-5 imagery, we examined shrub canopy recovery rates since different burn years. With the use of linear-plateau regression, it was determined that shrub cover in mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt. subsp. vaseyana [Rydb.] Beetle) communities recovered approximately 27 yr after fire, with an average shrub cover of 38%. These results are consistent with other field-based studies in mountain big sagebrush communities.

[1]  Christopher Small,et al.  The Landsat ETM+ spectral mixing space , 2004 .

[2]  D. Terrance Booth,et al.  Very Large Scale Aerial Photography for Rangeland Monitoring , 2006 .

[3]  C. Wambolt,et al.  Recovery of big sagebrush communities after burning in south-western Montana. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  J. V. Soares,et al.  Characterization of pasture biophysical properties and the impact of grazing intensity using remotely sensed data , 2007 .

[5]  D. Roberts,et al.  A comparison of methods for monitoring multitemporal vegetation change using Thematic Mapper imagery , 2002 .

[6]  Emilio Chuvieco,et al.  Assessment of vegetation regeneration after fire through multitemporal analysis of AVIRIS images in the Santa Monica Mountains , 2002 .

[7]  W. F. Mueggler,et al.  Sprouting of Bitterbrush (Purshia Tridentata) Following Burning or Top Removal , 1956 .

[8]  Myles J. Watts,et al.  Long-term recovery of Wyoming big sagebrush after four treatments , 1996 .

[9]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Community type differentiation using NOAA/AVHRR data within a sagebrush-steppe ecosystem , 1993 .

[10]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[11]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Spectral mixture modeling: A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 Site , 1986 .

[12]  J. Richards,et al.  Growth of sagebrush and bitterbrush following simulated winter browsing: mechanisms of tolerance , 1993 .

[13]  Keith T. Weber,et al.  Challenges of Integrating Geospatial Technologies Into Rangeland Research and Management , 2006 .

[14]  R. Clark,et al.  Mapping vegetation in Yellowstone National Park using spectral feature analysis of AVIRIS data , 2003 .

[15]  Jay E. Anderson,et al.  LANDSCAPE‐SCALE CHANGES IN PLANT SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND BIODIVERSITY OF A SAGEBRUSH STEPPE OVER 45 YEARS , 2001 .

[16]  Margaret E. Gardner,et al.  Mapping Chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains Using Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Models , 1998 .

[17]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[18]  M. Caldwell,et al.  SEASONAL PATTERN OF NET PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF ARTEMISIA TRIDENTATA , 1973 .

[19]  N. West,et al.  Ecology and management of sage-grouse and sage-grouse habitat , 2004 .

[20]  W. Baker.  Fire and Restoration of Sagebrush Ecosystems , 2006 .

[21]  D. Lobell,et al.  Quantifying vegetation change in semiarid environments: precision and accuracy of spectral mixture analysis and the normalized difference vegetation index. , 2000 .

[22]  A. Rencz,et al.  Remote sensing for the earth sciences , 1999 .

[23]  Larry A. Nelson,et al.  A FA.MILY OF MODELS INVOLVING INTERSECTING STRAIGHT LINES AND CONCO.'MITANT EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS USEFUL IN EVALUATING RESPONSE TO FERTILIZER NUTRIENTS' , 1975 .

[24]  P. Lesica,et al.  Recovery of Big Sagebrush Following Fire in Southwest Montana , 2007 .

[25]  Christopher D. Elvidge,et al.  Monitoring Seasonal Dynamics of Arid Land Vegetation Using AVIRIS Data , 1998 .

[26]  D. T. Booth,et al.  Measuring Plant Cover in Sagebrush Steppe Rangelands: A Comparison of Methods , 2006, Environmental management.

[27]  W. D. Billings,et al.  REFLECTION OF VISIBLE AND INFRARED RADIATION FROM LEAVES OF DIFFERENT ECOLOGICAL GROUPS , 1951 .

[28]  D. Roberts,et al.  Practical limits on hyperspectral vegetation discrimination in arid and semiarid environments , 2001 .

[29]  Jingfeng Xiao,et al.  A comparison of methods for estimating fractional green vegetation cover within a desert-to-upland transition zone in central New Mexico, USA , 2005 .

[30]  N. Glenn,et al.  LiDAR measurement of sagebrush steppe vegetation heights , 2006 .

[31]  P. Chavez.  Image-Based Atmospheric Corrections - Revisited and Improved , 1996 .