Atmospheric fluidized bed gasification of untreated and leached olive residue, and co-gasification of olive residue, reed, pine pellets and Douglas fir wood chips

The fluidized bed gasification of untreated and pre-treated olive residue and pre-treated olive residue mixed with reed, pine pellets and Douglas fir wood chips is studied. Leaching is used as a pre-treatment process targeted on the elimination of alkali metals such as K and Na as well as chlorine to reduce/eliminate the ash-related problems during gasification. The leaching pre-treatment process could affect the producer gas composition toward the lower or higher yield of CO and H2 of the producer gas depending on the moisture content of parent fuels. The lower total tar yield of the producer gas in the case of leached olive residue was observed compared to untreated olive residue. At the same time, there are present wider varieties of different tar components in the producer gas of the leached olive residue compared to the untreated one. The distinctions in tar composition and content between the leached and untreated olive residue are attributed to the alkali and alkali earth metal and chorine chemistry affected by leaching pre-treatment. The addition of woody fuels and reed at elevated proportions resulted in the lower LHV value compared to the leached olive residue. The tar content of the producer gas is seen to increase adding reed and woody fuels to the leached olive residue, i.e. the producer gas contained additional variety of tar components whereas phenol becomes one of the key components determining the total tar content, apart from benzene, toluene and naphthalene. This is seen to be due to the higher cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin as well as higher chlorine content of the reed and woody fuels compared to the leached olive residue. The olive residue is seen to be better fuel for gasification compared with woody fuels and reed. Even more, we believe that the leached olive residue is better compared to all other tested fuel/mixtures in this study. It is seen that the proportions of different fuels in the mixture play role in the composition of the producer gas.

[1]  M. Aznar,et al.  Biomass gasification in atmospheric and bubbling fluidized bed: effect of the type of gasifying agent on the product distribution , 1999 .

[2]  Andrew Narvaez,et al.  Biomass gasification with air in an atmospheric bubbling fluidized bed. Effect of six operational variables on the quality of the produced raw gas , 1996 .

[3]  B. Kelleher,et al.  Review of literature on catalysts for biomass gasification , 2001 .

[4]  Bryan M. Jenkins,et al.  On the properties of washed straw , 1996 .

[5]  J. D. Lopez-Gonzalez,et al.  Activated carbons from almond shells—I: Preparation and characterization by nitrogen adsorption , 1982 .

[6]  M. Hanna,et al.  Contemporary issues in thermal gasification of biomass and its application to electricity and fuel production. , 2008 .

[7]  K. Khilar,et al.  Influence of mineral matter on biomass pyrolysis characteristics , 1995 .

[8]  C. Blasi,et al.  Thermogravimetric Analysis and Devolatilization Kinetics of Wood , 2002 .

[9]  G. N. Richards,et al.  Gasification of biomass chars in carbon dioxide: dependence of gasification rate on the indigenous metal content , 1990 .

[10]  H. Spliethoff,et al.  Tar quantification with a new online analyzing method , 2000 .

[11]  Jie Feng,et al.  Formation of tar and its characterization during air–steam gasification of sawdust in a fluidized bed reactor , 2010 .

[12]  Robert C. Brown,et al.  Ancillary equipment for biomass gasification , 2002 .

[13]  R. Tyler,et al.  Flash pyrolysis of coals: influence of cations on the devolatilization behaviour of brown coals , 1980 .

[14]  William A. Peters,et al.  Heterogeneous cracking of wood pyrolysis tars over fresh wood char surfaces , 1989 .

[15]  Emmanuel G. Koukios,et al.  Physicochemical upgrading of agroresidues as feedstocks for energy production via thermochemical conversion methods , 2002 .

[16]  Gerrit Brem,et al.  Review of Catalysts for Tar Elimination in Biomass Gasification Processes , 2004 .

[17]  T. Namioka,et al.  High Tar Reduction with porous-particles for Low Temperature Biomass Gasification : Effects of Porous Particles on Tar and Gas Yields during Sawdust Pyrolysis , 2003 .

[18]  R. Kandiyoti,et al.  Tar Formation and Destruction in a Fixed Bed Reactor Simulating Downdraft Gasification: Optimization of Conditions , 2008 .

[19]  Truls Liliedahl,et al.  Metallic iron as a tar breakdown catalyst related to atmospheric, fluidised bed gasification of biomass , 2006 .

[20]  Nicola Macchioni,et al.  Genetic selection within Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) in Europe for papermaking uses , 2002 .

[21]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  A review of the primary measures for tar elimination in biomass gasification processes , 2003 .

[22]  Claes Brage,et al.  Use of amino phase adsorbent for biomass tar sampling and separation , 1997 .

[23]  A. Cabanillas,et al.  Gasification of leached orujillo (olive oil waste) in a pilot plant circulating fluidised bed reactor. Preliminary results , 2004 .

[24]  R. Warnecke,et al.  Gasification of biomass: comparison of fixed bed and fluidized bed gasifier , 2000 .

[25]  Chun-Zhu Li,et al.  Combined effects of pressure and ion-exchangeable metallic species on pyrolysis of Victorian lignite☆ , 2003 .

[26]  I. Odenbrand,et al.  Tar formation in pressurized fluidized bed air gasification of woody biomass , 2000 .

[27]  Emmanuel G. Koukios,et al.  Effect of leaching on the ash behavior of olive residue during fluidized bed gasification , 2002 .