How reliable are the functional connectivity networks of MEG in resting states?

We investigated the reliability of nodal network metrics of functional connectivity (FC) networks of magnetoencephalography (MEG) covering the whole brain at the sensor level in the eyes-closed (EC) and eyes-open (EO) resting states. Mutual information (MI) was employed as a measure of FC between sensors in theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands of MEG signals. MI matrices were assessed with three nodal network metrics, i.e., nodal degree (Dnodal), nodal efficiency (Enodal), and betweenness centrality (normBC). Intraclass correlation (ICC) values were calculated as a measure of reliability. We observed that the test-retest reliabilities of the resting states ranged from a poor to good level depending on the bands and metrics used for defining the nodal centrality. The dominant alpha-band FC network changes were the salient features of the state-related FC changes. The FC networks in the EO resting state showed greater reliability when assessed by Dnodal (maximum mean ICC = 0.655) and Enodal (maximum mean ICC = 0.604) metrics. The gamma-band FC network was less reliable than the theta, alpha, and beta networks across the nodal network metrics. However, the sensor-wise ICC values for the nodal centrality metrics were not uniformly distributed, that is, some sensors had high reliability. This study provides a sense of how the nodal centralities of the human resting state MEG are distributed at the sensor level and how reliable they are. It also provides a fundamental scientific background for continued examination of the resting state of human MEG.

[1]  K. Kaski,et al.  Intensity and coherence of motifs in weighted complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Han Zhang,et al.  Test–retest assessment of independent component analysis-derived resting-state functional connectivity based on functional near-infrared spectroscopy , 2011, NeuroImage.

[3]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  S. Makeig,et al.  Section: Behavioral/systems/cognitive Medial Prefrontal Theta Bursts Precede Rapid Motor Responses during Visual Selective Attention Introduction , 2022 .

[5]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  M. Roulston.  Estimating the errors on measured entropy and mutual information , 1999 .

[7]  P. Fransson.  Spontaneous low‐frequency BOLD signal fluctuations: An fMRI investigation of the resting‐state default mode of brain function hypothesis , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[8]  B. Biswal,et al.  The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Seung-Hyun Jin,et al.  Increased information transmission during scientific hypothesis generation: mutual information analysis of multichannel EEG. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[10]  E. Formisano,et al.  Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  Spontaneous Brain Activity in the Default Mode Network Is Sensitive to Different Resting-State Conditions with Limited Cognitive Load , 2009, PloS one.

[12]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Cognitive fitness of cost-efficient brain functional networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[14]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Cortical Hubs Revealed by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity: Mapping, Assessment of Stability, and Relation to Alzheimer's Disease , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model , 2004, NeuroImage.

[17]  Seung-Hyun Jin,et al.  Differences in brain information transmission between gifted and normal children during scientific hypothesis generation , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[18]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Efficiency and Cost of Economical Brain Functional Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  D. Cicchetti,et al.  Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. , 1981, American journal of mental deficiency.

[20]  Randy L. Gollub,et al.  Test–retest study of fMRI signal change evoked by electroacupuncture stimulation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[21]  Karl J. Friston.  Modalities, Modes, and Models in Functional Neuroimaging , 2009, Science.

[22]  Gordon Pipa,et al.  Transfer entropy—a model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[23]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  William C. Herndon,et al.  Graph theoretical analysis of water clusters , 1991 .

[25]  Arjen van Ooyen,et al.  Altered temporal correlations in parietal alpha and prefrontal theta oscillations in early-stage Alzheimer disease , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  J. Gore,et al.  Mutual information analysis of the EEG in patients with Alzheimer's disease , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[28]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Intrinsic Connectivity Networks, Alpha Oscillations, and Tonic Alertness: A Simultaneous Electroencephalography/Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Dynamical Patterns of Epidemic Outbreaks in Complex Heterogeneous Networks , 1999 .

[31]  A. Vespignani,et al.  The architecture of complex weighted networks. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Ernst Fernando Lopes Da Silva Niedermeyer,et al.  Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , 1982 .

[33]  S. Paek,et al.  Cortico-muscular coherence increases with tremor improvement after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease , 2009, Neuroreport.

[34]  Liang Wang,et al.  Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[36]  Jochen Kaiser,et al.  Transfer entropy in magnetoencephalographic data: quantifying information flow in cortical and cerebellar networks. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[37]  Y. Lai,et al.  Characterization of weighted complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  C. Stam,et al.  Small‐world properties of nonlinear brain activity in schizophrenia , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[39]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Removal of magnetoencephalographic artifacts with temporal signal‐space separation: Demonstration with single‐trial auditory‐evoked responses , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[41]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Reproducibility of graph metrics of human brain functional networks , 2009, NeuroImage.

[42]  Theo Gasser,et al.  Assessing intrarater, interrater and test–retest reliability of continuous measurements , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[43]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[44]  Danielle Smith Bassett,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[45]  M. Newman.  Analysis of weighted networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[46]  Liang Wang,et al.  Altered small‐world brain functional networks in children with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[47]  H. Berendse,et al.  The application of graph theoretical analysis to complex networks in the brain , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[48]  C. Stam,et al.  Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  G. Sandini,et al.  Graph theoretical analysis of magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Reorganization of brain functional small‐world networks during finger movements , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[51]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Structural Insights into Aberrant Topological Patterns of Large-Scale Cortical Networks in Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.