论文信息 - Multiattribute Measurement Models and Multiattribute Attitude Theory: A Test of Construct Validity

Multiattribute Measurement Models and Multiattribute Attitude Theory: A Test of Construct Validity

A distinction is drawn between the multiattribute attitude model as a measurement device and as a theory of attitude formation and change. Using an analysis of variance paradigm to investigate the underlying multiplicative and summative assumptions, Fishbein's multiattribute theory is found to demonstrate reasonably high construct validity. Individual differences in attribute combination rules are identified, and the issue of cognitive averaging vs. cognitive summation is raised.

J. Bettman | N. Capon | R. Lutz

[1] William L. Wilkie,et al. Issues in Marketing's use of Multi-Attribute Attitude Models , 1973 .

[2] James R. Bettman,et al. A Multimethod Approach to Validating Multi-Attribute Attitude Models , 1975 .

[3] W. Hays. Statistics for psychologists , 1963 .

[4] Leonard G. Rorer,et al. "What, can the devill speake true?" , 1974 .

[5] R. Lutz. Changing Brand Attitudes through Modification of Cognitive Structure , 1975 .

[6] M. Fishbein. An Investigation of the Relationships between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude toward that Object , 1963 .

[7] D. Campbell,et al. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[8] Frederick A. Russ. Evaluation Process Models and the Prediction of Preference , 1971 .

[9] N. Anderson,et al. Information integration in risky decision making , 1970 .

[10] I. Ajzen,et al. Attitudes toward objects as predictors of sin-gle and multiple behavioral criteria , 1974 .