The selection of artificial corner reflectors based on RCS analysis

Artificial corner reflectors (ACRs) are widely applicable in monitoring terrain change via interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) remote sensing techniques. Many different types are available. The choice of the most appropriate ones has recently attracted scholarly attentions. Based on physical optics methods, via calculating the radar cross section (RCS) values (the higher the value, the better the detectability), the current study tested three ACRs, i.e., triangular pyramidal, rectangular pyramidal and square trihedral ACRs. Our calculation suggests that the square trihedral ACR produces the largest RCS but least tolerance towards incident radar ray’s deviation from optimal angle. The triangular pyramidal trihedral ACR is the most geometrically stable ACR, and has the highest tolerance towards incident radar ray’s deviation. Its RCS values, however, are the least of the three. Due to the high cost of deploying ACRs in the fields, the physical optics method seems to provide a viable way to choose appropriate ACRs.

[1]  Urs Wegmüller,et al.  JERS SAR interferometry for land subsidence monitoring , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  C. Aanandan,et al.  Radar cross-section enhancement of dihedral corner reflector using fractal-based metallo-dielectric structures , 2006 .

[3]  E. Kennaugh,et al.  Transient and impulse response approximations , 1965 .

[4]  Shyh-Kang Jeng,et al.  High frequency scattering from trihedral corner reflectors and other benchmark targets: SBR versus experiment , 1991 .

[5]  William B. Gordon,et al.  Far-field approximations to the Kirchoff-Helmholtz representations of scattered fields , 1975 .

[6]  Andreas Reigber,et al.  Estimation of the Surface Velocity Field of the Aletsch Glacier Using Multibaseline Airborne SAR Interferometry , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Chengfan Li,et al.  Analysis of artificial corner reflector’s radar cross section: a physical optics perspective , 2012, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[8]  Carlos López-Martínez,et al.  Transpolarizing Trihedral Corner Reflector Characterization Using a GB-SAR System , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[9]  C. Wang,et al.  Detecting the regional linear subsidence based on CRInSAR and PSInSAR integration , 2011 .

[10]  Chengfan Li,et al.  Analysis of RCS characteristic of dihedral corner and triangular trihedral corner reflectors , 2010, 2010 5th International Conference on Computer Science & Education.

[11]  Jian Li,et al.  Feature extraction of SAR targets consisting of trihedral and dihedral corner reflectors , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[12]  Hiroyoshi Yamada,et al.  Polarimetric Scattering Analysis for a Finite Dihedral Corner Reflector , 2006, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[13]  Tang Shuo,et al.  RCS Analysis of Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle , 2007 .

[14]  A. Michaeli.  Elimination of infinities in equivalent edge currents, Part II: Physical optics components , 1986 .

[15]  C. Balanis,et al.  RCS analysis and reduction for lossy dihedral corner reflectors , 1989 .

[16]  Fabio Rocca,et al.  Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Claudio Gennarelli,et al.  Backscattering by loaded and unloaded dihedral corners , 1987 .

[18]  Leo P. Ligthart,et al.  Calibration of a polarimetric radar using a rotatable dihedral corner reflector , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  Incremental diffraction coefficients for the extended physical theory of diffraction , 1995 .

[20]  C. Balanis.  Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[21]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Wide-band VHF scattering from a trihedral reflector situated above a lossy dispersive halfspace , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[22]  Efficient solution for backscattered field of a dihedral corner reflector , 1995 .

[23]  S. Lee,et al.  Shooting and bouncing rays: calculating the RCS of an arbitrarily shaped cavity , 1989 .

[24]  New hybridization of PO, SBR, and MoM for scattering by large complex conducting objects , 2007 .

[25]  N. Casagli,et al.  Monitoring landslide displacements by using ground-based synthetic aperture radar interferometry: Application to the Ruinon landslide in the italian Alps , 2003 .

[26]  W. Anderson,et al.  Consequences of nonorthogonality on the scattering properties of dihedral reflectors , 1987 .

[27]  M. Crosetto,et al.  Subsidence monitoring using SAR interferometry: Reduction of the atmospheric effects using stochastic filtering , 2002 .

[28]  N. Casagli,et al.  Landslide monitoring by using ground-based SAR interferometry: an example of application to the Tessina landslide in Italy , 2003 .

[30]  Xiaoli Ding,et al.  Monitoring Earth Surface Deformations with InSAR Technology : Principle and Some critical Issues , 2001 .

[31]  H. Kaufmann,et al.  Landslide Monitoring in the Three Gorges Area Using D-INSAR and Corner Reflectors , 2004 .

[32]  C. Balanis,et al.  Backscatter analysis of dihedral corner reflectors using physical optics and the physical theory of diffraction , 1987 .

[33]  Claudio Gennarelli,et al.  Physical optics analysis of the field backscattered by a depolarising trihedral corner reflector , 1998 .

[34]  U. Wegmuller,et al.  Land Subsidence Monitoring with Differential SAR Interferometry , 2001 .

[35]  Constantine A. Balanis,et al.  Dihedral corner reflector backscatter using higher order reflections and diffractions , 1987 .

[36]  Eugene F. Knott,et al.  Radar Cross Section: Its Prediction, Measurement and Reduction , 1985 .

[37]  Hao Ling,et al.  High-frequency RCS of open cavities with rectangular and circular cross sections , 1989 .

[38]  Huadong Guo,et al.  Landslide monitoring by corner reflectors differential interferometry SAR , 2010 .

[39]  E. Knott,et al.  RCS reduction of dihedral corners , 1977 .

[40]  F. Mantovani,et al.  Remote sensing techniques for landslide studies and hazard zonation in Europe , 1996 .