E‐learning: you don't always get what you hope for

Despite substantial growth in the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) throughout western societies, there is much evidence of technology‐led innovations within Higher Education (HE) failing to achieve the anticipated transformations in learning and teaching. This paper reviews evidence from research and evaluation studies relating not only to e‐learning, but also to wider HE practices. It argues that the use of ICT does not, in itself, result in improved educational outcomes and ways of working. It considers contextual factors that are of greater significance in determining how and why e‐learning is used in HE. Students' engagement with e‐learning relates to their expectations and conceptions of learning and to assessment demands. Academics need to re‐assess their own beliefs and practices concerning teaching and assessment and their impact on the experience of learners. Both teachers and learners need to understand why e‐learning activities are to be undertaken and the rewards expected to be derived.

[1]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[2]  Robin Mason,et al.  Elearning: The Key Concepts , 2006 .

[3]  Françoise Blin,et al.  Why hasn't technology disrupted academics' teaching practices Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Chris Evans,et al.  The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  F. Marton,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2003 .

[7]  William A. Gerber The Internet in Britain 2009 , 2009 .

[8]  D. Hounsell The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education , 1997 .

[9]  H. Becker,et al.  Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life , 1995 .

[10]  David Boud,et al.  Enhancing learning through self assessment , 1995 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[12]  G. Boulton‐Lewis Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[13]  R. Säljö Learning about learning , 1979 .

[14]  Kenneth M. Cramer,et al.  The virtual lecture hall: utilisation, effectiveness and student perceptions , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  D. Bligh Learning to teach in higher education , 1993 .

[16]  Maarten De Laat,et al.  'Disruptive technologies', 'pedagogical innovation': What's new Findings from an in-depth study of students' use and perception of technology , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[18]  D. Laurillard The processes of student learning , 1979 .

[19]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning , 1999 .

[20]  David Kember,et al.  Lecturers’ Approaches to Teaching and their Relationship to Conceptions of Good Teaching , 2000 .

[21]  D. Watkins,et al.  Awareness of the backwash effect of assessment: A phenomenographic study of the views of Hong Kong and Swedish lecturers , 2005 .

[22]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  The Impact Of Training Of University Teachers on their Teaching Skills, their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of their Students , 2004 .

[23]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education , 2005 .

[24]  W. G. Perry Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[25]  Joanna Bull,et al.  Assessing student learning in higher education , 1997 .

[26]  P. Knight,et al.  Assessing learners in higher education , 1998 .

[27]  Adrian Kirkwood,et al.  Going outside the box: skills development, cultural change and the use of on-line resources , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[28]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Cultural specificity of approaches to studying in higher education: A literature survey , 1994 .

[29]  Sally Brown,et al.  Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. , 1999 .

[30]  Yvonne Fung,et al.  Collaborative online learning: interaction patterns and limiting factors , 2004 .

[31]  C. Hockings Removing the barriers? A study of the conditions affecting teaching innovation1 , 2005 .

[32]  D. Rowntree Assessing Students: How Shall We Know Them? , 1977 .

[33]  E. Wegner,et al.  Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life. , 1969 .

[34]  Linda Price,et al.  Learners and learning in the twenty‐first century: what do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? , 2005 .

[35]  MahdizadehHossein,et al.  Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers , 2008 .

[36]  Mark Campbell,et al.  What campus-based students think about the quality and benefits of e-learning , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[37]  L. Unwin,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2002 .

[38]  K. Scouller The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay , 1998 .

[39]  Janet Macdonald,et al.  Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[40]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Identifying academics' orientations to assessment practice , 2002 .

[41]  Adrian Kirkwood,et al.  Getting it from the Web: why and how online resources are used by independent undergraduate learners , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[42]  Clifford Brown,et al.  Electronic delivery of lectures in the university environment: An empirical comparison of three delivery styles , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[43]  J. Aultman The Hidden Curriculum , 2007 .

[44]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  Learning to teach. , 1996 .

[45]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers , 1992 .

[46]  K. Trigwell,et al.  How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context , 2006 .

[47]  Mike Johnson,et al.  Effective practice with e-learning , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[48]  David Kember,et al.  Beliefs about Knowledge and the Process of Teaching and Learning as a Factor in Adjusting to Study in Higher Education , 2001 .

[49]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Revisiting academics' beliefs about teaching and learning , 2001 .

[50]  D. Anderson,et al.  The hidden curriculum. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[51]  Paul Trowler,et al.  Department-level Cultures and the Improvement of Learning and Teaching , 2000 .

[52]  C. Miller,et al.  Up to the Mark: A Study of the Examination Game. , 1974 .

[53]  Ellen Helsper,et al.  Internet in Britain: 2007 , 2007 .

[54]  M. Sundberg,et al.  Assessing student learning. , 2002, Cell biology education.

[55]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective , 1996 .