Dependence of Gorlin Formula and Continuit Equation Valve Areas on Transvalvular Volume Flow Rate in Valvular Aortic Stenosis

BackgroundValve areas derived by the Gorlin formula have been observed to vary with transvalvular volume flow rate. Continuity equation valve areas calculated from Doppler- echo data have become a widely used alternate index of stenosis severity, but it is unclear whether continuity equation valve areas also vary with volume flow rate. This study was designed to investigate the effects of changing transvalvular volume flow rate on aortic valve areas calculated using both the Gorlin formula and the continuity equation in a model of chronic valvular aortic stenosis. Methods and ResultsUsing a canine model of chronic valvular aortic stenosis in which anatomy and hemodynamics are similar to those of degenerative aortic stenosis, each subject (n=8) underwent three studies at 2-week intervals. In each study, transvalvular volume flow rates were altered with saline or dobutamine infusion (mean, 10.3±5.1 flow rates per study). Simultaneous measurements were made of hemodynamics using micromanometer-tipped catheters, of ascending aortic instantaneous volume flow rate using a transit-time flowmeter, and of left ventricular outflow and aortic jet velocity curves using Doppler echocardiography. Valve areas were calculated from the invasive data by the Gorlin equation and from the Doppler-echo data by the continuity equation. In the 24 studies, mean transit-time transvalvular volume flow rate ranged from 80±33 to 153±49 mL/min (P < .0001). Comparing minimum to maximum mean volume flow rates, the Gorlin valve area changed from 0.54±0.22 cm2 to 0.68±0.21 cm2 (P < .0001), and the continuity equation valve area changed from 0.57±0.18 cm2 to 0.70±0.20 cm2 (P < .0001). A strong linear relation was observed between Gorlin valve area and mean transit-time volume flow rate for each study (median, r = .88), but the slope of this relation varied between studies. The Doppler-echo continuity equation valve area had a weaker linear relation with transit-time volume flow rate for each study (median, r = .51). ConclusionsIn this model of chronic valvular aortic stenosis, both Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas were flow-dependent indices of stenosis severity and demonstrated linear relations with transvalvular volume flow rate. The changes in calculated valve area that occur with changes in transvalvular volume flow should be considered when measures of valve area are used to assess the hemodynamic severity of valvular aortic stenosis.

[1]  C. Otto,et al.  Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of aortic stenosis. , 1990, Cardiology clinics.

[2]  L Hatle,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. , 1980, British heart journal.

[3]  C. Otto,et al.  Physiologic changes with maximal exercise in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler echocardiography. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  E Sowton,et al.  Normal and stenotic human aortic valve opening: in vitro assessment of orifice area changes with flow. , 1990, European heart journal.

[5]  T. Tsagaris,et al.  Hemodynamic effects of exercise in patients with aortic stenosis. , 1969, The American journal of medicine.

[6]  A. Selzer,et al.  Valvular Aortic Stenosis: A Clinical and Hemodynamic Profile of Patients , 1987 .

[7]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Theoretical and practical differences between the Gorlin formula and the continuity equation for calculating aortic and mitral valve areas. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  C. Otto,et al.  Doppler echocardiography in adults with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness. , 1988, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  M. Crawford,et al.  Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula. , 1985, Circulation.

[10]  B. Carabello.  Advances in the hemodynamic assessment of stenotic cardiac valves. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  R. S. Mitchell,et al.  When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula?: Variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  J. Murgo,et al.  Effect of exercise on indices of valvular aortic stenosis. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[13]  C. Otto,et al.  Experimental Validation of Doppler Echocardiographic Measurement of Volume Flow Through the Stenotic Aortic Valve , 1988, Circulation.

[14]  [Surgical pathology of the aortic valve: a morphologic study on 912 surgically excised valves]. , 1992, Giornale italiano di cardiologia.

[15]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[16]  J. Chambers,et al.  Ventricular stroke work loss: validation of a method of quantifying the severity of aortic stenosis and derivation of an orifice formula. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  A. Bove,et al.  A new technique for producing pure aortic stenosis in animals. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[18]  W. Likoff,et al.  Valvular Heart Disease , 2018, The Perioperative Medicine Consult Handbook.

[19]  B. Carabello.  Timing of surgery in mitral and aortic stenosis. , 1991, Cardiology clinics.

[20]  Experimental Validation of Doppler Echocardiographic Measurement of Volume Flow Through the Stenotic Aortic Valve , 1988 .

[21]  L L Huntsman,et al.  Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  A. Weyman,et al.  Influence of orifice geometry and flow rate on effective valve area: an in vitro study. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Review of hydrodynamic principles for the cardiologist: applications to the study of blood flow and jets by imaging techniques. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  I. Palacios,et al.  Effects of dobutamine on Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas and valve resistance in valvular aortic stenosis. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  J. Chambers,et al.  Continuity equation and Gorlin formula compared with directly observed orifice area in native and prosthetic aortic valves. , 1992, British heart journal.

[26]  R GORLIN,et al.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. , 1951, American heart journal.