Open innovation web-based platforms: The impact of different forms of motivation on collaboration

Abstract Given that open innovation web-based platforms (OIPs) allow for the collaboration of individuals and companies, this paper focuses on exploring the motivations for participating and collaborating in OIPs. Extant studies are conflicting, especially with respect to the importance of the monetary reward as a motivation. Moreover, literature supports our premise from the individuals’ motivations analysis viewpoint, but not from the companies’ perspective. Finally, literature does not consider the differences related to different members and to different phases of the innovation process. First, we base the literature on open innovation on the Internet (crowdsourcing, peer production and open source) to identify the potential motivations. We then deeply analyse 116 OIPs to determine if the motivations can be a function of the phase of innovation and the dependency on members. We show that the design of the motivational system should take into consideration the different stages of the innovation process and that the OIPs should consider moving from ‘work place’ logic to ‘social place’ logic.

[1]  J. Lindic,et al.  Value proposition as a catalyst for a customer focused innovation , 2011 .

[2]  Alberto De Toni,et al.  Organizational design drivers to enable emergent creativity in web‐based communities , 2012 .

[3]  Barton C. Massey,et al.  DESIGN METHODS , 2002 .

[4]  Enrique Murillo,et al.  Communities of practice in the business and organization studies literature , 2011, Inf. Res..

[5]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[6]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2007 .

[7]  Alberto De Toni,et al.  A methodology of technological foresight: A proposal and field study , 2011 .

[8]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing: A Model for Leveraging Online Communities , 2011 .

[9]  Nina Mazar,et al.  Large stakes and big mistakes , 2009 .

[10]  G. Pisano Which kind of collaboration is right for you , 2009 .

[11]  Tudor Rickards,et al.  Creative Management: A Predicted Development from Research into Creativity and Management , 2007 .

[12]  Ted S. Sindlinger,et al.  Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business , 2010 .

[13]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  What drives collective innovation? Exploring the system of drivers for motivations in open innovation Web-based platforms , 2012, Inf. Res..

[14]  Phillip Brown,et al.  Human capital, social capital and collective intelligence , 2000 .

[15]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Altruistic Individuals, Selfish Firms? The Structure of Motivation in Open Source Software , 2004, First Monday.

[16]  Sarah Milne Self-efficacy in changing societies , 1999, Journal of health psychology.

[17]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[18]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Working for free? Motivations of participating in open source projects , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  A model for assessing the coherence of companies’ knowledge strategy , 2011 .

[20]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2002 .

[21]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[22]  Heli Väätäjä,et al.  Rewarding in open innovation communities – how to motivate members , 2010 .

[23]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving , 2008 .

[24]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Towards a model of understanding social search , 2008, SSM '08.

[25]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[26]  R. Curtis The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life , 1992 .

[27]  A. Molina,et al.  Collaborative networked organisations and customer communities: value co-creation and co-innovation in the networking era , 2011 .

[28]  M. McElroy Social innovation capital , 2002 .

[29]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[30]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  Integrated production/distribution planning in the supply chain: the Febal case study , 2007 .

[31]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[32]  Nicoletta Corrocher,et al.  The adoption of Web 2.0 services: An empirical investigation , 2011 .

[33]  L. Jeppesen,et al.  The Value of Openness in Scientific Problem Solving , 2007 .

[34]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Intentional social action in virtual communities , 2002 .

[35]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams , 2006, MIS Q..

[36]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Daren C. Brabham Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: The composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application , 2008, First Monday.

[38]  P. Kollock The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[39]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the Proposition That "Design Is Making Sense (Of Things)" , 1989 .

[40]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Maria Antikainen,et al.  Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation , 2010 .

[42]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Alberto De Toni,et al.  From design driven innovation to meaning strategy , 2012 .

[44]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  A performance measurement system for facility management: The case study of a medical service authority , 2007 .

[45]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Economics of Technology Sharing: Open Source and Beyond , 2004 .

[46]  C. Decker,et al.  How to Motivate People to Put Their Money Where Their Mouth Is: What Makes Employees Participate in Electronic Prediction Markets? , 2011 .

[47]  Pirjo Näkki,et al.  Online Tools for Co-design: User Involvement through the Innovation Process , 2008 .

[48]  C. Anderson,et al.  Free: The Future of a Radical Price , 2009 .

[49]  A. Toni,et al.  The key roles in the informal organization: A network analysis perspective , 2010 .

[50]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  Methodology of business ecosystems network analysis: A case study in telecom italia future centre , 2013 .

[51]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  A mechanism for supporting collective innovation: the open contract-based challenge , 2013, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[52]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  Exploring the impact of motivations on the attraction of innovation roles in open innovation web-based platforms , 2013 .

[53]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[54]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[55]  David Gefen,et al.  Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[56]  Jenna McWilliams,et al.  The Participatory Cultures Handbook , 2011 .

[57]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..