Sensitivity of dynamic simulations of gait and dynamometer experiments to hill muscle model parameters of knee flexors and extensors.

We assessed and compared sensitivities of dynamic simulations to musculotendon (MT) parameters for gait and dynamometer experiments. Our aim with this comparison was to investigate whether dynamometer experiments could provide information about MT-parameters that are important to reliably study MT-function during gait. This would mean that dynamometer experiments could be used to estimate these parameters. Muscle contribution to the joint torque (MT-torque) rather than relative MT-force primarily affects the resulting gait pattern and torque measured by the dynamometer. In contrast to recent studies, therefore, we assessed the sensitivity of the MT-torque, rather than the sensitivity of the relative MT-force. Based on sensitivity of the MT-torque to a parameter perturbation, MT-parameters of the knee flexors and extensors were classified in three categories: low, medium, and high. For gait, classification was based on the average sensitivity during a gait cycle. For isometric and isokinetic dynamometer experiments, classification was based on the highest sensitivity found in the experiments. The calculated muscle contributions to the knee torque during gait and dynamometer experiments had a high sensitivity to only a limited number of MT-parameters of the knee flexors and extensors, suggesting that not all MT-parameters need to be estimated. In general, the highest sensitivity was found for tendon slack length. However, for some muscles the sensitivity to the optimal fibre length or the maximal isometric muscle force was also high or medium. The classification of the individual MT-parameters for gait and dynamometer experiments was largely similar. We therefore conclude that dynamometer experiments provide information about MT-parameters important to reliably study MT-function during gait, so that subject-specific estimates of MT-parameters could be made based on dynamometer experiments.

[1]  Marcus G Pandy,et al.  Sensitivity of muscle force estimates to variations in muscle-tendon properties. , 2007, Human movement science.

[2]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[3]  Goele Pipeleers,et al.  Dynamic simulation of human motion: numerically efficient inclusion of muscle physiology by convex optimization , 2008 .

[4]  Charles L Rice,et al.  Reliability of a single-session isokinetic and isometric strength measurement protocol in older men. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[5]  M G Pandy,et al.  Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  F. Zajac,et al.  A musculoskeletal model of the human lower extremity: the effect of muscle, tendon, and moment arm on the moment-angle relationship of musculotendon actuators at the hip, knee, and ankle. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Brian A. Garner,et al.  Estimation of Musculotendon Properties in the Human Upper Limb , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  R. M. Glaser,et al.  Improving the efficacy of electrical stimulation-induced leg cycle ergometry: an analysis based on a dynamic musculoskeletal model , 1993 .

[10]  R. Brand,et al.  Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  I Jonkers,et al.  A physiology based inverse dynamic analysis of human gait: potential and perspectives , 2009, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[12]  Goele Pipeleers,et al.  A convex optimization approach to dynamic musculoskeletal analysis , 2006 .

[13]  C. Scovil,et al.  Sensitivity of a Hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameters. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  F. Zajac,et al.  A planar model of the knee joint to characterize the knee extensor mechanism. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  D. Sutherland The evolution of clinical gait analysis. Part II kinematics. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[16]  L Stark,et al.  Estimated mechanical properties of synergistic muscles involved in movements of a variety of human joints. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  R. Brand,et al.  The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  D. Newham,et al.  Skeletal Muscle Structure and Function — Implications for rehabilitation and sports medicine , 1992 .

[19]  F. Zajac,et al.  Muscle coordination of maximum-speed pedaling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  A J van Soest,et al.  Influence of the parameters of a human triceps surae muscle model on the isometric torque-angle relationship. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  F.E. Zajac,et al.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  I Jonkers,et al.  Kalman smoothing improves the estimation of joint kinematics and kinetics in marker-based human gait analysis. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  M. Henriksen,et al.  Learning effect of isokinetic measurements in healthy subjects, and reliability and comparability of Biodex and Lido dynamometers , 2005, Clinical physiology and functional imaging.

[24]  S. J. Sullivan,et al.  Test-retest reliability of isokinetic knee extension and flexion. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.