Non-bayesian foundations for statistical estimation, prediction, and the ravens example

The paper provides a formal proof that efficient estimates of parameters, which vary as as little as possible when measurements are repeated, may be expected to provide more accurate predictions. The definition of predictive accuracy is motivated by the work of Akaike (1973). Surprisingly, the same explanation provides a novel solution for a well known problem for standard theories of scientific confirmation — the Ravens Paradox. This is significant in light of the fact that standard Bayesian analyses of the paradox fail to account for the predictive utility of universal laws like “All ravens are black.”

[1]  Peter Urbach,et al.  Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach , 1989 .

[2]  H. Kyburg,et al.  How the laws of physics lie , 1984 .

[3]  S. L. Meyer Urning a Resolution of Hempel's Paradox , 1977, Philosophy of Science.

[4]  David Miller,et al.  Inference, method, and decision , 1977 .

[5]  J. Earman,et al.  Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory , 1994 .

[6]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[7]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[8]  William Harper Consilience and Natural Kind Reasoning , 1989 .

[9]  Malcolm R. Forster,et al.  Sober's Principle of Common Cause and the Problem of Comparing Incomplete Hypotheses , 1988, Philosophy of Science.

[10]  Malcolm R. Forster,et al.  How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories will Provide More Accurate Predictions , 1994, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[11]  Elliott Sober,et al.  Likelihood and Convergence , 1988, Philosophy of Science.

[12]  B. Skyrms Causal necessity: A pragmatic investigation of the necessity of laws , 1980 .

[13]  Patrick Suppes A Bayesian Approach to the Paradoxes of Confirmation , 1966 .

[14]  N. Cartwright How the laws of physics lie , 1984 .

[15]  P. M. Williams Bayesian Conditionalisation and the Principle of Minimum Information , 1980, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[16]  Ronald N. Giere,et al.  Understanding Scientific Reasoning , 1979 .

[17]  P. Horwich Probability and Evidence , 1972 .

[18]  Carl G. Hempel,et al.  I.—STUDIES IN THE LOGIC OF CONFIRMATION (II.) , 1945 .

[19]  Ellery Eells Rational Decision and Causality , 1982 .

[20]  Malcolm R. Forster,et al.  UNIFICATION, EXPLANATION, AND THE COMPOSITION OF CAUSES IN NEWTONIAN MECHANICS , 1988 .