Stroke rehabilitation: patient activity during non-therapy time.

Since practice is a crucial variable in motor learning, this study aimed to quantify the level of motor activity during inpatient stroke rehabilitation and to investigate the relationship between level of motor ability with performance of motor activity. Seventeen stroke patients were observed on nine weekdays in a fast-stream rehabilitation hospital. The results showed that for two-thirds of the day, patients were not involved in structured therapy and that for half of these observations, the patients were not engaged in motor activities. There was a positive correlation (rho=0.68, p<0.05) between patients' performance of motor activity and a total Functional Independence Measure score. It appears that strategies are required so that, regardless of the level of disability, patients can be practising at an appropriate level.

[1]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Behavioural mapping of patients on a stroke unit. , 1989, International disability studies.

[2]  Activity patterns of a strokerehabilitation unit , 1980 .

[3]  Christopher A. Bain,et al.  Admissions, patterns of utilization and disposition of cases of acute stroke in Brisbane hospitals , 1989, The Medical journal of Australia.

[4]  Marcus J. Fuhrer,et al.  Rehabilitation outcomes : analysis and measurement , 1987 .

[5]  Keith Ra.  Observations in the rehabilitation hospital: twenty years of research. , 1988 .

[6]  F. Mackey,et al.  Motor assessment scale scores as a measure of rehabilitation outcome following stroke. , 1992, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[7]  Catherine M. Dean,et al.  Physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation : bases for Australian physiotherapists' choice of treatment , 1994 .

[8]  Roberta B. Shepherd,et al.  A motor relearning programme for stroke , 1982 .

[9]  Colleen G. Canning,et al.  Key Issues in Neurological Physiotherapy , 1991 .

[10]  R Adams,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation: are highly structured units more conducive to physical activity than less structured units? , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  R. Keith.  Organizational effectiveness in the rehabilitation hospital: A cross-national comparison. , 1986 .

[12]  J. Poole,et al.  Motor assessment scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients. , 1996, Stroke.

[14]  E. Ernst,et al.  A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy. , 1990, Stroke.

[15]  D. Tinson,et al.  How stroke patients spend their days. An observational study of the treatment regime offered to patients in hospital with movement disorders following stroke. , 1989, International disability studies.

[16]  J. Feigenson,et al.  The Disability Oriented Rehabilitation Unit - A Major Factor Influencing Stroke Outcome , 1979, Stroke.

[17]  J. Carr,et al.  Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[18]  Gordon,et al.  Advances in Stroke Rehabilitation , 1993 .

[19]  R A Keith,et al.  Time use of stroke patients in three rehabilitation hospitals. , 1987, Social science & medicine.

[20]  J. Carr.  Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation , 1987 .

[21]  The "value" of functional independence measure scores. , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[22]  C. Anderson,et al.  Ascertaining the true incidence of stroke: experience from the Perth Community Stroke Study, 1989–1990 , 1993, The Medical journal of Australia.

[23]  B. Hamilton.  A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. , 1987 .

[24]  M. Dombovy,et al.  Rehabilitation for stroke: a review. , 1986, Stroke.

[25]  D. Christie.  Stroke in Melbourne, Australia: An Epidemiological Study , 1981, Stroke.