Influence of Water Stress on Grapevines Growing in the Field: From Leaf to Whole-Plant Response

A comparative study of soil-plant water relations was conducted on three grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L. cvv. carignane, merlot, shiraz) to investigate their adjustment to short-term and long-term water stress under field conditions. Adjustment was a function of the relative stability of the internal plant water status on diurnal and seasonal scales. On a diurnal scale, stomatal closure in response to water vapour pressure directly contributed to this stability. Indirect evidence suggested an influence of the soil water status on the diurnal stomatal activity. On a seasonal scale, sufficient leaf hydration required high whole-plant hydraulic conductance. This was achieved by either daily stomatal regulation or limitation of leaf area. Physiological adjustment to water stress through stomatal control was well developed in cv. carignane, which originated in a Mediterranean environment. However, cv. shiraz, which was of mesic origin, apparently adjusted to water stress by reducing leaf area. Our study demonstrates the utility of integrating data on stomatal conductance, leaf water potential and whole-plant hydraulic conductance to interpret whole plant adaptation to water stress, and elucidates two mechanisms by which genotypes differentially acclimate to water stress.

[1]  F. Meinzer,et al.  Root Signals Mediate Coordination of Stomatal and Hydraulic Conductance in Growing Sugarcane , 1991 .

[2]  S. Rambal,et al.  Stomatal conductance of some grapevines growing in the field under a Mediterranean environment. , 1990 .

[3]  F. Meinzer,et al.  Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity* , 1990 .

[4]  S. Higgins,et al.  Diurnal water relations of apple, apricot, grape, olive and peach in an arid environment (Jordan) , 1989 .

[5]  H. Schultz,et al.  Resistance to Water Transport in Shoots of Vitis vinifera L. : Relation to Growth at Low Water Potential. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[6]  M. Zimmermann,et al.  Spring filling of xylem vessels in wild grapevine. , 1987, Plant physiology.

[7]  C. Valancogne,et al.  Variation de la vitesse du vent a l'interieur et au-dessus d'une vigne , 1987 .

[8]  B. Loveys,et al.  DIURNAL CHANGES IN THE PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF FIELD-GROWN GRAPE VINES. , 1987, The New phytologist.

[9]  M. Castagneto,et al.  EFFECT OF SOIL WATER CONTENT ON LEAF WATER POTENTIAL AND STOMATAL RESISTANCE OF GRAPEVINE (VITIS VINIFERA) GRAFTED ON DIFFERENT ROOTSTOCKS. , 1985 .

[10]  B. Loveys DIURNAL CHANGES IN WATER RELATIONS AND ABSCISIC ACID IN FIELD‐GROWN VITIS VINIFERA CULTIVARS , 1984 .

[11]  B. Loveys,et al.  DIURNAL CHANGES IN WATER RELATIONS AND ABSCISIC ACID IN FIELD-GROWN , 1984 .

[12]  B. Henderson-Sellers,et al.  A new formula for latent heat of vaporization of water as a function of temperature , 1984 .

[13]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Stomatal conductance, transpiration, and resistance to water uptake in a Pinussylvestris spacing experiment , 1984 .

[14]  R. W. Pearcy,et al.  Leaf conductance and transpiration, and water relations of evergreen and deciduous perennials co‐occurring in a moist chaparral site , 1984 .

[15]  A. Ramina,et al.  STUDIES ON WATER RELATIONS OF GRAPEVINE (VITIS VINIFERA) , 1981 .

[16]  A. E. Hall,et al.  Stomatal response to environment and a possible interrelation between stomatal effects on transpiration and CO2 assimilation , 1980 .

[17]  D. Lawlor,et al.  The Relationship between Transpiration, Root Water Uptake, and Leaf Water Potential , 1979 .

[18]  L. H. Allen,et al.  Soil-plant Water Relations in a New York Vineyard: Resistances to Water Movement1 , 1978, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[19]  Vin,et al.  Analyse de la croissance des feuilles du sarment de vigne : estimation de sa surface foliaire par échantillonnage , 1976 .

[20]  P. Jarvis The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field , 1976 .

[21]  B. Klepper,et al.  Diurnal pattern of water potential in woody plants. , 1968, Plant physiology.

[22]  J. Tenhunen,et al.  Quinta: A Physiologically-Based Growth Simulator for Drought Adapted Woody Plant Species , 1989 .

[23]  F. Meinzer,et al.  Relationship between Root/Soil Hydraulic Properties and Stomatal Behavior in Sugarcane* , 1989 .

[24]  H. Schultz,et al.  Vegetative Growth Distribution During Water Deficits in Vitis vinifera L , 1988 .

[25]  M. M. Chaves,et al.  Photosynthesis and water relations of grapevines growing in Portugal - response to environmental factors , 1987 .

[26]  M. M. Chaves,et al.  Water-Stress Effects on CO 2 Exchange in Two Grapevine Cultivars , 1987 .

[27]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Stomatal responses to air humidity and to soil drought. , 1987 .

[28]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Leaf-age effects on stomatal conductance. , 1987 .

[29]  Philip W. Rundel,et al.  Plant Water Balance , 1987 .

[30]  Ernst-Detlef Schulze,et al.  Whole-Plant Responses to Drought , 1986 .

[31]  J. Passioura Resistance to Drought and Salinity: Avenues for Improvement , 1986 .

[32]  N. Katerji,et al.  Etude in situ du fonctionnement hydrique et photosynthétique d'une vigne conduite en lyre , 1986 .

[33]  Neil C. Turner,et al.  Crop Water Deficits: A Decade of Progress , 1986 .

[34]  M. Gullo,et al.  Hydraulic Parameters Measured in 1-Year-Old Twigs of some Mediterranean Species with Diffuse-Porous Wood: Changes in Hydraulic Conductivity and Their Possible Functional Significance , 1985 .

[35]  W. Kliewer,et al.  Effect of Irrigation, Crop Level and Potassium Fertilization on Carignane Vines. I. Degree of Water Stress and Effect on Growth and Yield , 1983, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[36]  W. Kliewer,et al.  Effect of Irrigation, Crop Level and Potassium Fertilization on Carignane Vines. II. Grape and Wine Quality , 1983, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[37]  H. Meidner Our understanding of plant water relations , 1983 .

[38]  M. M. Chaves Photosynthetic Characteristics and Environmental Control in Some Grapevine Cultivars , 1981 .

[39]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Responses to Humidity by Stomata of Nicotiana glauca L. And Corylus avellana L. Are Consistent With the Optimization of Carbon Dioxide Uptake With Respect to Water Loss , 1980 .

[40]  R. Smart Aspects of Water Relations of the Grapevine (Vitis Vinifera) , 1974, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[41]  P. Kriedemann,et al.  Effects of irradiance, temperature, and leaf water potential on photosynthesis of vine leaves , 1971 .